Carrying on from rrmjr13's bonus these, I wonder how bonus offerings really work. Are they scams?
I recently joined InterCasino. I got an October offer, where I deposited 100 and received 100 bonus. It mentioned a 15-time wagering requirement. I lost this. Sometime later, I made a further deposit. Lost. Sometime later, made another deposit and won. I stopped and wanted to make a withdrawal. I could not make a withdrawal as 'I have yet to meet wagering requirements'.
My question:
The subsequent deposits did not get bonuses. Since only the initial deposit is entitled to a bonus, as I lost this, is it not fair to impose restrictions in subsequent deposits? I deposited 100, got a 100 bonus, so the 15-time wagering requirement comes to 3000. As mentioned, lost it early on, which is fine 'cos I had a good time. Made further deposits, won back, but could not withdraw as "the wagering requirements" were not met. So, if I were to have deposited 5000 and won 5000 playing Black jack, wagering total of 10000, I would still be unable to withdraw as Black Jack only has a 5% weighting. It's fair for the initial deposit which invoked a bonus. But surely for subsequently deposits, like this Black Jack scenario given above, withholding winnings and deposits is just wrong.
I would say that InterCasino's bonus offering is nothing but a scam. Don't get me wrong. They have some decent games. But the bonus is a scam, there's no other conclusion.
P.S. Just logged on and I have now miraculously fulfilled the 100 bonus wagering requirement.
I recently joined InterCasino. I got an October offer, where I deposited 100 and received 100 bonus. It mentioned a 15-time wagering requirement. I lost this. Sometime later, I made a further deposit. Lost. Sometime later, made another deposit and won. I stopped and wanted to make a withdrawal. I could not make a withdrawal as 'I have yet to meet wagering requirements'.
My question:
The subsequent deposits did not get bonuses. Since only the initial deposit is entitled to a bonus, as I lost this, is it not fair to impose restrictions in subsequent deposits? I deposited 100, got a 100 bonus, so the 15-time wagering requirement comes to 3000. As mentioned, lost it early on, which is fine 'cos I had a good time. Made further deposits, won back, but could not withdraw as "the wagering requirements" were not met. So, if I were to have deposited 5000 and won 5000 playing Black jack, wagering total of 10000, I would still be unable to withdraw as Black Jack only has a 5% weighting. It's fair for the initial deposit which invoked a bonus. But surely for subsequently deposits, like this Black Jack scenario given above, withholding winnings and deposits is just wrong.
I would say that InterCasino's bonus offering is nothing but a scam. Don't get me wrong. They have some decent games. But the bonus is a scam, there's no other conclusion.
P.S. Just logged on and I have now miraculously fulfilled the 100 bonus wagering requirement.