Am i missing something here?, I would say that a 96x average isnt excessively bad, there are games out there with a far lower average. However it would suggest that it is indeed a low variance slot with only 21% of the RTP coming from the feature making the other 75% coming from the base based on the 450 spins for feature, which fits with people saying its good for wagering. An average slot I would say has traditionally aimed for around the 30-35% mark.
From the comments I have seen about this game maybe most the problem is people are seeing it as a high variance and playing as one but it isnt?
The alarm bells should be ringing loudly as soon as lots of people say its good to grind bonus wagering with as with low variance slots you get to a point of no return a lot quicker than a HV one.
Remember for the rare 1000x feature you would need about a dozen other features less than 40x to keep the 96x average.
My opinion?
The only smoke and mirrors here is that its a LV slot with the illusion of it being a HV and doing it very well. = Play with caution.
Let the flaming of my comment begin......