- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
- Location
- Uk
You obviously missed my “All accounts closed” thread.
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
I feel the same, playing a few times a week down to one limited Borenanza session a month, remarkable about how quick I got used to not playing and in retrospect it almost seems inane that I did play often.I thought I might miss it but I really don’t. It had just become a habit, as I wasn’t enjoying it towards the end anyway. Who would enjoy depositing £100-£300 on a regular basis and not even seeing a bonus round?
If the experience was still the same as the first 5 years, I’d still be spinning away, but it absolutely isn’t, it’s not even close. It will only get worse as well. There’s just a handful of diehards left on the forum and countless have vanished over the years.
Online gambling will eat itself, just as the FOBT’s did. It’s just a matter of time.
I feel the same, playing a few times a week down to one limited Borenanza session a month, remarkable about how quick I got used to not playing and in retrospect it almost seems inane that I did play often.
Yes, I actually have two valid accounts, but one is still pending a Casumo-style AML/KYC nightmare so has been ignored and mothballed. But yes, for me as a self-employed aff it's just not worth the stress.You probably explained in a video (and I missed that bit) or on here in a post at some point, however, why are you limited to just this single session.
Surely you have access to more than one casino account given the amount of sites that are out there. Is it in the main that you're not willing to jump through any SoW hoops mate?
I had a last cascade on reels 1.2 and 3.You obviously missed my “All accounts closed” thread.
With a single A on reel 2 i think it would have paid 129x.I had a last cascade on reels 1.2 and 3.
I've no idea what that would have paid but I am considering my position
View attachment 208452
That eases my mind Keoffe mate. Luckily I have gone on with a few bonuses to increase my bets and sign out if I fail wid me depositWith a single A on reel 2 i think it would have paid 129x.
That is assuming i did the numbers right, so take it with a grain of salt.
Biggest reason for the relatively low pay is not reaching reel 6, 5oak A only pays 0.6x compared to 1.75x for a 6oak.

Just one, just firkin' one diamante on reel 2 for 1200x....
Just one, just firkin' one diamante on reel 2 for 1200x....
Probably saw Kenny's pic, read Chop's post, then decided 72,845 wasn't enough.


72,845 what
???? spins between GOLD's ???![]()

The cascades are not a seperate call after an initial spin no. It’s already decided as soon as you hit start. In other words the cascades you were waiting for in the above screen shot were not randomly selecting symbols to drop down. They’d already been selected.
The max Megaways is obviously carefully designed, like most of BTG bonus rounds, take those god awful games where you can increase the ways to 100 billion in the feature, the reel sets are obv designed to fuck you over easily with certain symbols a plenty on mostly reels but coming around as often as Hayley’s comet on one of them.
Despite what people think, the bonus is not pre determined either. Each one of those mostly dead spins is plucked from the reel sets containing mostly blocking gems and scatters.
It’s how some Megaways games work.
Blueprint ones use the jammin jar methodology.
Or at least the earlier ones did, this has been shown on Diamond Mine for example.
Is there a 94% version?I’m amazed the likes of hills, paddy, coral, lads, sky haven’t gone over to the 94% model.
All the above are champions when it comes to choosing dog shit RTP models.
Would then only really leave me with 365, and their meagre forced loss limits they have enforced.
In a way I wish they all would so I wouldn’t have to play the piece of shit again.
Yeah there is.
Mmmm 95.52% from evo now eh?
Ones I’ve seen are all 96%.
Mmmmm the below is sky vegas.View attachment 209003View attachment 209004
Odd that they'd want to save 0.48%
Maybe they've been gimping the game, and when it was re-tested, it never quite made the 96%
Livescorebet and also running at virginbetWhich site is that???
Bonanza during the last few months. £1200 in in Paddy Power £130 out.
It is brutal.
But I will get a return right with a 96%+ return if I continue?
I set a limit of £100 per day usuallly limited to 40p spins and each deposit busted out. Gone like an egg timer usually. The rtp has to be pretty low. Last night seen no bonus at all as was the same on friday. Hours without a bonus. PP do not show rtp as far as I can find.Well it depends how much churn you've done and where your RTP is. If you play for long enough you'll always zero out your balance and never make a withdrawal.
The thing with Bonanza is it's vanishingly unlikely to ever do a life-saver like I got with Who's The Bride which hoofed out 5959x, paid back nearly all my losses, and gave me an escape route whilst saying, 'Yeah I won't be bothering with that again'.
Bonanza's enduring popularity is something of a mystery to me as it really does have a properly fucked up maths model.
