New Slot Announcement Bonanza by Big Time Gaming

[snorky510238]

Played it for hours today at Thrills low rolling 20p. Over 1000 spins 14 heartbeat moments not 1 bonus round.If you ask me these sessions are to common to be random they are Infact anything but.

 

[mack341]

reversed my whill £79 withdrawal to play bonanza and try and recover losses elsewhere, broke the No 1 rule and bonanza gladly took the lot at minimum stake giving me 2 paltry bonuses in return. This game at the outset when you open it up is very good at disguising where it is heading, bust town.

 

[snorky510238]

reversed my whill £79 withdrawal to play bonanza and try and recover losses elsewhere, broke the No 1 rule and bonanza gladly took the lot at minimum stake giving me 2 paltry bonuses in return. This game at the outset when you open it up is very good at disguising where it is heading, bust town.

I can't help notice a few slots have this trait.The first 50 spins or so lead you to think something is around the corner and your balance is the same or a little above what you started with then slowly but surely it starts nibbling away and before you know it you are faced with a do or die situation with the latter being the more likely outcome.

 

[goatwack]

I can't help notice a few slots have this trait.The first 50 spins or so lead you to think something is around the corner and your balance is the same or a little above what you started with then slowly but surely it starts nibbling away and before you know it you are faced with a do or die situation with the latter being the more likely outcome.

A lot of slots do this with alarming regularity, i.e it'll hold your balance unbelievably and not deviate between a certain amount, lulling the player into believing 'Wow, this is gonna be a good session!'.

Then, as if by magic, it'll go on fantastic death plummets whereby the scatters have been seemingly removed, and those wins you'd get- maybe 1 in 3 spins- have all but vanished. Suddenly it's 9 dead spins in succession with the odd 0.5x win thrown in so as not to make it too obvious

It's not natural behaviour, it's too apparent, and Bonanza does this better than any other

 

[greylady]

A lot of slots do this with alarming regularity, i.e it'll hold your balance unbelievably and not deviate between a certain amount, lulling the player into believing 'Wow, this is gonna be a good session!'.

Then, as if by magic, it'll go on fantastic death plummets whereby the scatters have been seemingly removed, and those wins you'd get- maybe 1 in 3 spins- have all but vanished. Suddenly it's 9 dead spins in succession with the odd 0.5x win thrown in so as not to make it too obvious

It's not natural behaviour, it's too apparent, and Bonanza does this better than any other

You hit the nail on the head with that one! It's so obvious it's part of the programming and nothing to do with random.

 

[snorky510238]

I think bonanza exposes a lot of aspects of non randomness. Probably because of the complexity of the programme it made it more difficult to disguise than your average slot.I remember talking to a guy who had done online poker programming once and he said that however well they thought they had done regarding the apparent randomness it never seemed quite right.

 

[interlog]

Very risky playing at max bet this one, but it worked out for this player:



So big wins are possible on big stakes too I guess... or am I wrong?

 

[goatwack]

Random is pretty hard to program, so hard in fact that it acts anything but

 

[nutnut]

wont be playing this or any slot with cash for a while. 3 days straight of nothing but loss has wiped out my gambling budget. to be honest after 3 days of nothing but dire crap. i dont want to play any slot.

 

[snorky510238]

Very risky playing at max bet this one, but it worked out for this player:



So big wins are possible on big stakes too I guess... or am I wrong?

Incredible hit bonanza just paid out 0.00001% of it's profit to date lol.

 

[goatwack]

Incredible hit bonanza just paid out 0.00001% of it's profit to date lol.

It has been known to malfunction, yes

 

[snorky510238]

It sounds and looks fantastic but it would be interesting to know if that win actually puts them infront in the game overall.My guess is if they were totally honest the answer would be no. I am a very low roller and I know if I had that hit I would still be on the wrong side.

 

[aceking123]

Well it's been out a long time millions of spins played through it & we still haven't seen many massive hits. Great hit on gems but I'm not convinced this machine is playing at full potential.
Something is not right on it.

 

[goatwack]

It sounds and looks fantastic but it would be interesting to know if that win actually puts them infront in the game overall.My guess is if they were totally honest the answer would be no. I am a very low roller and I know if I had that hit I would still be on the wrong side.

I'm just happy it's happened to a streamer, max betting, with a link to Rizk promoting them, and it happened on the last spin.

It's unbelievable. No really, I don't believe it

 

[snorky510238]

I'm just happy it's happened to a streamer, max betting, with a link to Rizk promoting them, and it happened on the last spin.

It's unbelievable. No really, I don't believe it

Like I posted previous about athletes smashing world records.The sinister side of me asks the question first.

 

[aceking123]

I'm just happy it's happened to a streamer, max betting, with a link to Rizk promoting them, and it happened on the last spin.

It's unbelievable. No really, I don't believe it

Hmmmm I cannot possibly see & hear what your reffering too goatwack

It's just random luck with these streams)

 

[goatwack]

Like I posted previous about athletes smashing world records.The sinister side of me asks the question first.

Ha that takes me back to Ben Johnson winning the 100m and later being found to be doping, my first experience of athletes cheating, since then it's been betting syndicates, match- fixing rings, 'dodgy' referees and umpires etc.

Makes watching even sport laborious, Platini even admitted recently how FIFA engineer matchups for finals, that's before we even go into the dubious host- voting that goes on

 

[brianmon]

Very risky playing at max bet this one, but it worked out for this player:



So big wins are possible on big stakes too I guess... or am I wrong?

Huge amount. But still only 5212x - €1040 on minimum bet

 

[interlog]

Huge amount. But still only 5212x - €104 on minimum bet

I'll take an "only" 5,212x hit anytime of the day

 

[snorky510238]

Ha that takes me back to Ben Johnson winning the 100m and later being found to be doping, my first experience of athletes cheating, since then it's been betting syndicates, match- fixing rings, 'dodgy' referees and umpires etc.

Makes watching even sport laborious, Platini even admitted recently how FIFA engineer matchups for finals, that's before we even go into the dubious host- voting that goes on

Yeah that was mine too and we are supposed to believe gambling is as clean as a whistle no wonder my ribs are aching.

 

[torors]

Very risky playing at max bet this one, but it worked out for this player:



So big wins are possible on big stakes too I guess... or am I wrong?

Funny. I’ve played Bonanza to death at Rizk and can swear they capped the stake at 100NOK/€10. Maybe this guy has a special deal, or I smell demo play.

 

[snorky510238]

Bearing in mind I can go through £50 at 20p stakes on a bad day and probably a lot more if I didn't cap sessions it makes me wonder what this person loses on a bad day if you compare it to mine (and I wouldn't say that's excessive) they would lose £5,000 so that win pays for 20 bad days. When it comes to gamble awareness and source of wealth I sometimes wonder how these people can afford it legitimately. I am not saying they can't but how closely are their accounts vetted.

 

[goatwack]

Bearing in mind I can go through £50 at 20p stakes on a bad day and probably a lot more if I didn't cap sessions it makes me wonder what this person loses on a bad day if you compare it to mine (and I wouldn't say that's excessive) they would lose £5,000 so that win pays for 20 bad days. When it comes to gamble awareness and source of wealth I sometimes wonder how these people can afford it legitimately. I am not saying they can't but how closely are their accounts vetted.

You mean vetted as in the casino they are promoting?

 

[zap987]

Bearing in mind I can go through £50 at 20p stakes on a bad day and probably a lot more if I didn't cap sessions it makes me wonder what this person loses on a bad day if you compare it to mine (and I wouldn't say that's excessive) they would lose £5,000 so that win pays for 20 bad days. When it comes to gamble awareness and source of wealth I sometimes wonder how these people can afford it legitimately. I am not saying they can't but how closely are their accounts vetted.

He said on stream he was down 8k for the day when he hit that.

 

[snorky510238]

No where the money comes from to sustain that level of gambling.If they are indeed backed by or linked to a casino then it counts for nothing as it would just be the same as consistently playing demo mode as bound to hit a big win sometime without the risk of losing.