GrandMaster
Dormant account
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2004
- Location
- UK
Someone accepted the Wizard's challenge, read
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
.Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Thanks for the notification...
bethug said:my system can not stand up to that computer set up test, for one
I change games and i set limits. The whole thing most people make mistakes is they dont get up when they losing. Also who is going to play millions hands in one sessions
I would be willing to take the challenge using my original deposit only, never losing a dime and never putting in any more money than I started with, but it would take some time and need to be setup for the way I play, not one session. I would also request that what I do, not be posted anywhere or detailed on the website. I bet the Wiz would sh his pants and wonder how he never figured it out.Black21Jack said:I totally agree. No 'system' can beat the house in such a setup. As stated it is a negative expectation game but that does not mean it can't be beatI would be willing to take the challenge using my original deposit only, never losing a dime and never putting in any more money than I started with, but it would take some time and need to be setup for the way I play, not one session. I would also request that what I do, not be posted anywhere or detailed on the website. I bet the Wiz would sh his pants and wonder how he never figured it out.
bpb said:If I was offered 10:1 odds on something I considered a sure thing ... I'd take that bet in a heartbeat.
Hell, if I was offered 1:10 odds ... I'd do it too.
I'm sure the wiz would be more than willing to accomodate all reasonable requests regarding the test setup.
I would be willing to take the challenge using my original deposit only, never losing a dime and never putting in any more money than I started with, but it would take some time and need to be setup for the way I play, not one session.
Damian said:I change games and i set limits.
kangamick said:If i had a system that worked, i wouldnt share it with anyone.
DeMango said:I agree, what is $20K or even $40K if one truely has a winnable system? Shut up and take the money, slowly and very surely! I think the wiz is a great site and he wouldn't lsoe any money without spilling the beans. That said he did lose big bucks to a craps dice setting challenge recently!
nopebethug said:trick, are you winning and if you are keep using what u do to win, I will keep doing what i do
caruso said:He's offering 10 to one on a sure bet, boys.
That's 40K in the bank for the total inconvenience to yourselves of outlining the details of your systems and the time required to run a billion hands.
I'm sure he'd go higher as well. 10K / 100K. Maybe even 20K / 200K.
Can't understand for one second why you aren't taking him up on this. Your silence astounds me.
Blackjack21?
Damian?
bethug said:I am a winner, now if you want to challenge put the money on the table and lets go
. And it's not just toe-to-toe, it's ten times your stake. And it's not a "special programme" either, it's a simulator that runs hands fast, in addition to whatever extras enable the input of the additional parametres, such as your "game switch" requirement, or the cut-off at given win / loss targets. You seem to be suggesting that the challenge is unacceptable because Michael Shakelford may be running a "cheating" programme, which really is too weak to hold water!if anyone has an alternate way of contacting him let me know.
dominique said:If I had a working betting system of any kind, I would never ever sell it to the public. I would happily amass a mountain of wealth instead of collecting a pittance from each person buying it.
It makes no sense to sell a good system. Hence, I don't trust any system whatsoever that is being offered for sale.
The only thing I trust is basic strategy, and perhaps some adjustments made to adapt to particular softwares.

caruso said:I would gladly put money AGAINST it alongside Michael's challenge, Damian.
Regarding "cheating": "If you feel I did not run an honest simulation, I will provide the source code and you can have your own experts challenge it."
This is as open as can be. If you thought the programme cheats, have a software expert you know examine it.
bethug said:First i am not wastiing no money paying no one to run test on his program,
bethug said:My challenge is call a casino out(micro viper or rtg), put up 1000 bucks. I double the money with out a bonus. yes or no caurso
My understanding is that you don't pay the wizard for running his program.
On the other hand if after I won something I pull out my deposit and half my winning, and play only the remaining half of that then I will never lose! Because my winning is now guaranteed!
caruso said:Correct. And he pays TEN TIMES if he loses. 10 to one on a sure bet.
And they're not interested.
bethug said:i have proven my style of play has made me money.

gfkostas said:That's patently absurd.You never really provided any kind of verifiable data that your system does beat the house.:
mitch said:And Bethug never will, because he can't. Nobody can. Of course Bethug may be winning regularly in internet casinos but if he is it's because of bonuses pure and simple. If this is right why not just say so?
I have posted before that Bethug likes to portray himself as some sort of god who can change the universally accepted laws of probability at will. This god syndrome is a very well observed phenomenom. (Don't take it to heart Bethug most of the most successful commanders in history have suffered from it to some degree Napoleon, Alexander,Hitler, etc so you are in good company!) But if he is actually God why is he bothering to post on a public forum?
Can't see this post going anywhere as it is already heading for the 'yes I can, no you can't' scenario.
To paraphrase the Wiz "put up or shut up"
Mitch
"win don't gamble"
.Bethug big wins at times are a fluke.We should all stop reffering to hood3000 system as we spend 'energy' for something silly.
bethug said:if i would play a million hand in sesssion most likey from being human i would lose, cause of being tried.
