Betfair Casino Zero house edge games

[NewOrleans]

In all of online gaming,having a roulette with no zero is probably your only true 50/50.Seems like something you would see in the early 1900's if lucky...
The limits are not quite high but decent,poker has rake therefor a house edge sports betting don't offer true payouts neither does anything on every single round,except for roulette with no zero.The zero edge blackjack on betfair is in a long run basis so is the video poker.Having no zero,betting on black or red is purely 50/50.So out of all zero house edge games I would pick roulette.
There are ofcourse a few other instances of 50/50 odds...but rare
Does anyone disagree or have any comments vs Betfair

 

[love2winalot]

Hiya. imhop The house edge is NOT what causes players to lose their bankroll. No matter what, there will be losing streaks. There are the greatest card counters in the world, and they only push bets at +15 in a single deck game, and even then there are times they will lose 10-12 in a row.......

imhop, again, money management on the players part is more important than the house edge.

 

[KasinoKing]

I would pick roulette.
There are ofcourse a few other instances of 50/50 odds...but rare
Does anyone disagree or have any comments vs Betfair

When I first saw their no-zero roulette I thought "Great-10p chips!"...
But when I tried to place small bets I discovered that you can not spin the wheel with any single bet of under 1... so why the smaller chips??? :sob:

So we have 1 minimum chips (effectively) & a 50 total table limit, therefore IMHO it's crap.

Welcome to the forum!

 

[Manny Calavera]

Their Zero Baccarat simply can't be beaten anywhere on the web

Personally, I prefer their European Blackjack in the Main Lounge to their Zero Blackjack, and I've never been fond of Roulette.

 

[NewOrleans]

Thank you for your imput

This was my first post,I just respect zero house edge games as they cost the gambler the least amount of money in the long run.It is about bankroll management sure but playing with no house edge can save a lot of money,money you can make more money with I should add...

Thank you for the constructive criticism

 

[Grey]

This was my first post,I just respect zero house edge games as they cost the gambler the least amount of money in the long run.It is about bankroll management sure but playing with no house edge can save a lot of money,money you can make more money with I should add...

Thank you for the constructive criticism

But one thing not clear for me- Why the Main lounge and Zero lounge has a different table limits?

 

[EasyRhino]

But when I tried to place small bets I discovered that you can not spin the wheel with any single bet of under 1... so why the smaller chips??? :sob:

Can you scatter smaller chips around the layout for a total of $1?

 

[Grey]

But when I tried to place small bets I discovered that you can not spin the wheel with any single bet of under 1... so why the smaller chips???

Considering this, I think, Betvoyager No Zero Roulette looks more profitable because the minimum bet is only 1 eurocent.

 

[KasinoKing]

Can you scatter smaller chips around the layout for a total of $1?

No. That's what I'm saying - each bet, no matter where on the table, has to be a whole 1 (or more).
It's totally ridiculous.
KK

 

[Wisenheimer]

That's seems ridiculously high. So besides Betfair and Betvoyager, what are other options for no-zero roulette? And what are minimums?

 

[SlotMonster]

That's seems ridiculously high. So besides Betfair and Betvoyager, what are other options for no-zero roulette? And what are minimums?

IMO, BetVoyager is the best casino for you.
Table limits: 0.01 euros - 1000 euros! Max/min - 100000:1! Automatic and instant payouts! You still need something else?

 

[thelawnet]

Hiya. imhop The house edge is NOT what causes players to lose their bankroll.

That's not true at all

In fact it's exactly that. You can of course make ten bets on a slot at $10 a spin and lose all ten - that is variance at work - that could happen on a player advantage game even.

In the long run if the game has a player advantage you will win, and if it has a house advantage you will lose. That is certain. The only thing that varies is the number of bets for it to be 99%, 99.9%, etc. certain that you will end up behind or ahead. That's dependent on the paytable of the game - for a jackpot-type game it's a very long time, for a blackjack/baccarat type game it's shorter.

If there is a zero HA game, then 50% of all players will end up winning and 50% will lose, providing they play a sufficient number of hands. Blackjack is normal after a hundred hands or so, Jacks or Better after many many thousands, Roulette and Baccarat immediately.

 

[Grey]

If there is a zero HA game, then 50% of all players will end up winning and 50% will lose,

No house edge games just increase the chances to win more funds.

In any case, playing such games more profitable.

 

[The Dude]

Betfair removed from accredited section

Just an Admin note that Betfair is being removed from the accredited section until they get a new rep in the forum. The previous rep moved on to another position, and for now there is no one at the helm.

 

[NewOrleans]

Conclusion,betvoyager pwns betfair