- Joined
- May 22, 2012
Just to warn people, the accreditation info for Wintingo needs revising. It states 24-hour cashouts, no pending period, no max cashouts etc. I made my first withdrawal about 42 hours ago early Monday AM and it is still pending in my a/c as there is a 48-hour pending period. It also states on their banking terms a max cashout weekly of £4k. I didn't want to start a new thread as this already exists. It appears those earlier in this thread got cashouts to webwallets in good time, less than 24hrs. due to the extra efforts being made to get accredited.
I think it's important that we all keep an eye on this sort of thing wherever we play; surely the standards being met and established to gain accreditation should be maintained and never decreased, only bettered.
I think it's good practice for us all here to occasionally check back to the actual CM information for that particular accredited site. CM can't be expected to play at all accredited casinos and know what's occurring, so it's up to us to help.
1. We can help CM maintain and update accurately the accredited casino's profile information regarding pending/max cashouts etc.
2. It keeps the accredited casinos on the ball - any surreptitiously reduced criteria can be put on their profile quickly if players report it.
3. It prevents people (like I did) join on the strength of what they see in the profile, only to find the terms aren't as good.
4. It will help expose those who establish a profile to gain accreditation, and don't stick to the standards.
5. It will generally make the accredited profiles resource a better foundation for choosing a casino and reduce complaints.
Do I have a fair point here?
I think it would also be a good idea to have an 'average speed of response' stat somewhere as regards the appointed reps on here.
PS. I posted this on the end of the 'Baptism By Fire' of Wintingo Thread last night, but around the same time you might have noticed the forum came under a spam attack on all threads so it went straight down, plus it is a general idea and not really specific to Wintingo; it was the most recent example I could provide based on my experience. MY w/d was paid a couple of hours after the 48 expired FYI.
I think it's important that we all keep an eye on this sort of thing wherever we play; surely the standards being met and established to gain accreditation should be maintained and never decreased, only bettered.
I think it's good practice for us all here to occasionally check back to the actual CM information for that particular accredited site. CM can't be expected to play at all accredited casinos and know what's occurring, so it's up to us to help.
1. We can help CM maintain and update accurately the accredited casino's profile information regarding pending/max cashouts etc.
2. It keeps the accredited casinos on the ball - any surreptitiously reduced criteria can be put on their profile quickly if players report it.
3. It prevents people (like I did) join on the strength of what they see in the profile, only to find the terms aren't as good.
4. It will help expose those who establish a profile to gain accreditation, and don't stick to the standards.
5. It will generally make the accredited profiles resource a better foundation for choosing a casino and reduce complaints.
Do I have a fair point here?
I think it would also be a good idea to have an 'average speed of response' stat somewhere as regards the appointed reps on here.
PS. I posted this on the end of the 'Baptism By Fire' of Wintingo Thread last night, but around the same time you might have noticed the forum came under a spam attack on all threads so it went straight down, plus it is a general idea and not really specific to Wintingo; it was the most recent example I could provide based on my experience. MY w/d was paid a couple of hours after the 48 expired FYI.
