What if the people who win a prize in this competition are asked to pick a slot and everybody has to play those 10 games for August. Same point system - all hits upto 249x- 1 point, upto 499x 3 points and above 500x 5 points.
Screenshot entry limits can be decided later.
Nope. Sorry.
Players should be able to pick whatever slot they like at whatever stake they like.
And they should ESPECIALLY NOT BE FORCED into a position where (if they want to have a fair chance of winning one of the TOP prize(s)) they feel they have to play for 8 hours PER DAY EVERY DAY FOR A FULL MONTH.
That is actually encouraging reckless and irresponsible gambling. That is not what this forum should be about.
Giving ANY member(s) a say in what game(s) everyone else has to play in future comps means they can effectively set/make up the rules with the sole intention of suiting themselves and ONLY themselves.
And to hell with the majority. Yeah that's a swell idea
Only one person should get to decide. And that someone is Dave.
@Webzcas
As a non-entrant of the comps, he can be trusted to be impartial.
It has taken less than a week (it was actually three days) into a FIVE AND A HALF WEEKS LONG comp to see the massive flaws in this comp. The winner has already been decided. Second place is already as good as known too. And third place for that matter.
So basically, pretty much the entire field (bar three members, whose net contribution to the forum OUTSIDE of these comps is minimal at best) is having to settle for minor prizes already.
In short, Mr. Shine in post #350 completely nailed it.
Comps should be set up in a way that is appealing to the many, not the comp abusing few.
Nice hit though, this game's been absolutely brutal for 2 days now 
