There is more to that "fellow member" than meets the eye. I'm not making judgments or criticizing him, but 3 failed PABs give a bit of an indication that he may not be just a "recreational gambler". There is nothing wrong with that as long as he plays within the rules - in this particular case, he did not. The problem is, the rule he broke was fundamentally unfair and unreasonable.
KK
I made a PAb against racing post you find them on non can do list here at casinomeister .
My second Pab was against Bingolasvegascasino . They are out of business now and rogued at certain portals . They have closed their site without paying many people .
My third Pab was against Stryyke . Stryyke was closed by the Malta authorities .
I have to say that was paid in full with the Help of the Lottery and Gaming authority in Malta at the Stryyke case .
Please dont make judgements there are many factors that can lead to a PAB failure .
already helped pursued the casino to remove that term, and FYI I was on Skype to the SoF rep for an hour last night fighting Heador's case and trying to get a satisfactory resolution, even though he did not sign-up via my site.
They were "making the right noises" and though a final decision was not yet reached, I am cautiously optimistic.
Thank you for that . Lets see what happens .
I joined from the latestcasinobonuses Affilate . They advertise SOF on their main page . I will contact them and bring my issue to their attention .
I know for you own reasons you have a total hatred of everything Rival, but please take a step back a bit, take a deep breath and look again. They are no Virtual Group and not the devil incarnate!
I played at Cleopatras Palace . Similar Casino to Virtual (maybe they are connectet) and i have to say my experience with Slots of fortune was worse . Cleopatra paid my money in full , but i would never advise other people to play there........
@Spiderlegz
Thanks for showing that there is more behind this issue !

