- Joined
- May 22, 2012
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
"The average slot session length declined to 21 minutes, equalling the lowest recorded"
Must be all those Bonanza players....
Maybe they would like to make the slots payout now then.
What you mean you don’t already have that? You’re doing it wrong mate ?More chance of me having 730 super babes fall in love with me simultaneously, nice threesome daily for a whole year with plenty of variety
What, you've never had that before?More chance of me having 730 super babes fall in love with me simultaneously, nice threesome daily for a whole year with plenty of variety
That's what I thought - lower deposits or higher average stake, or is reduced RTP's having an effect?So the most was taken but the actual sessions were shorter on average?
Is that a reflection of more recent game design? Or just more people having a quick all or nothing spin?
Agree - look at NLC and their '5 scatters are rare dude without the bonus buy' line. UK punter wise, there'll be some chumps thinking they can hit it w/o the BB when in fact, they can't. How's that fair?It’s time as players that we should have rights under the Consumers Act. The Consumer has the right to information so if I am using the goods, then the provider should have to provide it.
Slots should come with a bona fide cert stating how many times the max win occurred during the alleged billions of testing spins. What the average amount of spins was to trigger the bonus and what the average paid amount was. How many times x5000 was hit, x1,000 was hit, etc.
It’s all very well churning out hundreds of games a month and expecting us to play them in blind faith. How many of these games actually produce wins they state they are capable of? My guess would be most of them never even pay close to the max win.