external image

Screen Shots that Suck!

Yet another decent win. but no wild line. the 4 wilds on the top line fell in the first 3 spins, and with the extra 5 spins, that meant i was waiting 14 spins for another wild to fill that gap.

779x stake at Betsson

ScreenHunter_35 Jun. 30 10.50.webp
 
Not during the free spins and oh my god: Why do you only play 11 lines?! :(

I'd just won a few pounds in a poker freeroll so lowered the lines as I often do to 9/11/13/17 to give myself a better chance of hitting the feature before busting out. Honestly the game was going crazy dropping in those stacked wilds every other spin on multiple reels, I was determined to hit a feature as I felt certain if I could just get the 10x multiplier I would definitely be looking at a 1000x bet hit.. in the end I hit four scatters twice in a row, with the features paying 300x and 550x bet, ended up cashing out £130 from £16 freeroll winnings .. so I guess it didnt suck too much in the end, but its got to be said that hit would of been amazing if I was playing more lines, the ones I werent playing would of nearly all been five of a kinds :(
 
No screenshot but I just made a £25 deposit at videoslots and my return was 0% RTP. :confused:

50 x £0.50 spins and not even a penny win, surely the odds of 50 losing spins in a row is so unlikely. It was on that winterberries slot.
 
well when u have a bonus round like this, u wish u had got the 2 scatters instead which would atleast have gave 2x, got 15 fs +5 extra spins and won nothing, doa is crap cuz i had in total 10 spins to get the wild on a line but all i kept getting was 10 or other lowest paying symbols till the last spin when i got a hat, could have done with couple of more high paying symbols if not a wild
 

Attachments

  • crap bdba.webp
    crap bdba.webp
    48.3 KB · Views: 255
  • crap doa 5 wilds.webp
    crap doa 5 wilds.webp
    90.5 KB · Views: 249
I dont know suck or not ?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

For god's sake Simon, you're in danger of turning into the Phil Hellmuth of this forum. ie someone who always remembers all of the bad beats he has taken, but conveniently forgets all of the suckouts he has dished out. :rolleyes:

Have the courtesy, the decency even, to be thankful that you were "lucky enough" to avoid a win of ZERO here. Because there are PLENTY of people on this forum who have had a WD with 3 reels turned wild and come away with NOTHING. Be happy that you won at all. Because the alternative was going to mean you being potentially less than 20 spins from going busto. And THAT would be what really sucks.
 
I dont know suck or not ?
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

I see you also posted this in the 'Winner Screenshots' thread... Unfortunately (as it's < 100x) it doesn't really belong in that thread either :rolleyes:

Seriously though... Disappointing because of what could have been? Probably. Does it suck? No (IMO). Regardless of the potential of 3 reels wild, it's still 90x your bet size. Don't forget you can turn 3 reels wild and still get a big fat zero return.
 
Last edited:
Whilst I do agree there are some posting screenshots that maybe don't deserve a place in 'screenshots that suck', I do think that the basic premise of this thread is the near miss, the almost hit, so it seems fair to post screenshots that whilst a reasonable win in their own right, if that last wished symbol had only come to join the party, the hit would of earnt a place in the mega 3000x win thread!

I posted such a screenshot not long ago where I had 11 wilds on Great Blue and still only managed around 200x ... yes okay its a nice enough win, but one wild on the other reel would have made it several 1000x, or even a picture symbol in the gap reel could have made it over 500x.. its so rare to get almost four reels wild in Great Blue that to me, it was sooooo nearly there but just not quite I wanted to post it.

Three reels wild on IR with matching symbols on the other two reels isn't the same to me - its by comparison a fairly common occurence and there are many suckier variations (such as no win whatsoever). But obviously this is just my opinion, and it would be a shame for people to worry about posting things they think suck here for fear of being called out!
 
Whilst I do agree there are some posting screenshots that maybe don't deserve a place in 'screenshots that suck', I do think that the basic premise of this thread is the near miss, the almost hit, so it seems fair to post screenshots that whilst a reasonable win in their own right, if that last wished symbol had only come to join the party, the hit would of earnt a place in the mega 3000x win thread!

I posted such a screenshot not long ago where I had 11 wilds on Great Blue and still only managed around 200x ... yes okay its a nice enough win, but one wild on the other reel would have made it several 1000x, or even a picture symbol in the gap reel could have made it over 500x.. its so rare to get almost four reels wild in Great Blue that to me, it was sooooo nearly there but just not quite I wanted to post it.

Three reels wild on IR with matching symbols on the other two reels isn't the same to me - its by comparison a fairly common occurence and there are many suckier variations (such as no win whatsoever). But obviously this is just my opinion, and it would be a shame for people to worry about posting things they think suck here for fear of being called out!

It's a fair point. Maybe we need two threads then....screenshots that suck (the good win that was almost a monster win) and screenshots that really suck (the next to nothing or actually zero win that was almost a monster win). Or as Balthazar once suggested a "big wins that suck" thread (he suggested that after a big wine and cheese hit on TFROL I think)

With regard to simon's IR post, that really should be going into the Best WD thread, not this one. In my humble opinion.
 
Last edited:
Spintee, correct me if I am wrong, but if you were playing the wild vines, it should be Sarah who appears at the end of the round, not Amber?

Speaking of Amber, I had back to back zero wins on her feature this morning. I've had plenty of zero win Amber rounds before, but never two in a row. And I was three spins away from having a zero win for a third consecutive Amber feature, before landing two scatters for my only win of that round. From a total of 4 Amber bonus rounds, I won a combined amount of under £10. I've lost £400 this week on IR, while betting only 60p a spin. And I got very, very little bang for that money. 4 WDs, 3 zero wins and my only win was about £6. A Troy bonus round that paid me 0.5 x my bet. Not one "half-decent", let alone good bonus round. No 5OAK of Amber, Michael or Sarah and only one 5OAK of Troy and it didn't even have a wild in it. My best win was a 24 x bet which came courtesy of 5 9s plus 2 wilds. Horrific spell of play and it is enough to make me drop to 30p a spin from now on....or take a very long break from playing IR at all. Because it is making Avalon 2 look attractive at the moment. Did I really just say that out loud? :eek::eek2:
 
takes the biscuit, 25 spins wild vines
View attachment 48034

Spintee, correct me if I am wrong, but if you were playing the wild vines, it should be Sarah who appears at the end of the round, not Amber?

Speaking of Amber, I had back to back zero wins on her feature this morning. I've had plenty of zero win Amber rounds before, but never two in a row. And I was three spins away from having a zero win for a third consecutive Amber feature, before landing two scatters for my only win of that round. From a total of 4 Amber bonus rounds, I won a combined amount of under £10. I've lost £400 this week on IR, while betting only 60p a spin. And I got very, very little bang for that money. 4 WDs, 3 zero wins and my only win was about £6. A Troy bonus round that paid me 0.5 x my bet. Not one "half-decent", let alone good bonus round. No 5OAK of Amber, Michael or Sarah and only one 5OAK of Troy and it didn't even have a wild in it. My best win was a 24 x bet which came courtesy of 5 9s plus 2 wilds. Horrific spell of play and it is enough to make me drop to 30p a spin from now on....or take a very long break from playing IR at all. Because it is making Avalon 2 look attractive at the moment. Did I really just say that out loud? :eek::eek2:

That game has been eating my balances for fun of late. Deposited £90 the other day, took the 25% bonus on offer and playing at minimum stake - 30p all the way,I busted out in little over an hour, I then later received a £10 red letter which went the same way. Has been lethal that game of late.
 
That game has been eating my balances for fun of late. Deposited £90 the other day, took the 25% bonus on offer and playing at minimum stake - 30p all the way,I busted out in little over an hour, I then later received a £10 red letter which went the same way. Has been lethal that game of late.

try playboy , its now four featues on the last dancing features eveyone had paid less than 5 times my bet not once has the wilds shown up same casino aswell ( , i played this feature for so long at pretty much every casino account i have & never has it ever been passed 2 features without the dance & wilds im taliking hundreds of features on it since it came out, something is a little fishy there (
 
try playboy , its now four featues on the last dancing features eveyone had paid less than 5 times my bet not once has the wilds shown up same casino aswell ( , i played this feature for so long at pretty much every casino account i have & never has it ever been passed 2 features without the dance & wilds im taliking hundreds of features on it since it came out, something is a little fishy there (

There is something about Gillian's Wild Night feature that just doesn't sit right with me. When I first tried the feature out, I was doing ok to good at it. Was getting the "WN" activated and almost always got 2 reels wild and on one occasion, 3 reels wild and more often that not, I could complete a 5OAK. On occasion, I would get up to 5 WNs activated during the feature. And then all of a sudden....

NOTHING!! :mad:

I had a run of SEVEN Wild Night features that gave no WNs at all. And finishing with wins of less than 10 x bet each time. At that point, I then formed an opinion that picking Gillian's feature is an even more wasteful pick than Sarah's Wild Vine on IR. I have to assume (rightly or wrongly) that it is because WN is just like the WD feature on IR. And for that reason, I think that is why virtually all of the Playboy screenies we see in this forum are on Sofia's running wilds feature. Gillian's feature promises the same full screen of wilds potential as Sofia's feature, but never seems to deliver....for anybody.
 
Spintee, correct me if I am wrong, but if you were playing the wild vines, it should be Sarah who appears at the end of the round, not Amber?

Speaking of Amber, I had back to back zero wins on her feature this morning. I've had plenty of zero win Amber rounds before, but never two in a row. And I was three spins away from having a zero win for a third consecutive Amber feature, before landing two scatters for my only win of that round. From a total of 4 Amber bonus rounds, I won a combined amount of under £10. I've lost £400 this week on IR, while betting only 60p a spin. And I got very, very little bang for that money. 4 WDs, 3 zero wins and my only win was about £6. A Troy bonus round that paid me 0.5 x my bet. Not one "half-decent", let alone good bonus round. No 5OAK of Amber, Michael or Sarah and only one 5OAK of Troy and it didn't even have a wild in it. My best win was a 24 x bet which came courtesy of 5 9s plus 2 wilds. Horrific spell of play and it is enough to make me drop to 30p a spin from now on....or take a very long break from playing IR at all. Because it is making Avalon 2 look attractive at the moment. Did I really just say that out loud? :eek::eek2:

I think you are right, so many lose free rounds I forget, I think this 1 will make it up :)

cccccccccccc.webp
 
Yeah couldn't agree more with funnymunny.

This thread is funny for the wrong reasons now, I click on it to see which unlucky player only won 900x their bet yesterday :rolleyes:

At this rate, it won't be long before a few members of this forum are doing blog entries that go something like this...

Deposited £50. Ran like God for 4 hours. Cashed out £3,000. But I was really hoping to cash out for £4,000. Gutted. :mad::( :sob: :(:mad: :sob:

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Batman wilds to the rescue, or not!

Pretty sure this sucks!

BIG WIN = 54x bet :rolleyes:

I actually laughed when this came up. First and only time I've hit all 3 batman wilds in the base game, and wouldn't you know it, no 5OAK, plus a dreaded scatter thrown in on reel one, just to rub it in. Haha...

As for the big win alert, um.. no comment.

Gaming irony at its finest!

PS: I suppose you could argue on one level that I was kinda lucky to even see 3 batman wilds to begin with. Hmm...
 
Last edited:
Yes we've all gotten plenty of these but it just really sucked this time as I was having my ass handed to me by Netent, I decided to give the old faithful MG a go and this was the only bonus round I got in my session after hundreds of empty spins. Amber Bonus Round. 60 cents bet, Scatters paid 120 coins.

6ify8l.jpg
 
At this rate, it won't be long before a few members of this forum are doing blog entries that go something like this...

Deposited £50. Ran like God for 4 hours. Cashed out £3,000. But I was really hoping to cash out for £4,000. Gutted. :mad::( :sob: :(:mad: :sob:

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

:lolup:

I'm quite new here and I read this thread around the first few pages and thought 'Ye, those suck ! Very frustrating', towards more recent posts your comment couldn't have been more accurate.

Come on guys, a win is a win ! Even if it isn't what you had hoped for :)
 
Sucks double!!!
First because I missed last JP symbol on reel 5,second because the wild does not count as a JP symbol...
So €40.00 instead of €480.00... :eek:

2ltoluh.jpg
The wild should be for all symbols!
I had 4 reels wild with jackpot on the remaining reel on wizard of oz on jjp!
 
The wild should be for all symbols!
I had 4 reels wild with jackpot on the remaining reel on wizard of oz on jjp!

yes I have missed out loads due to wilds do not count on jp symbels
This 1 is a still a bad miss, also the machine can be a real money eater, I have seen alot of sits geting these machines now including alot of bingo sites

Cture.webp
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top