- Joined
- Dec 23, 2005
- Location
- Italian but live in Brazil
Old Attachment (Invalid)
Screen Shots that Suck!
- Thread starter The Dude
- Start date
Old Attachment (Invalid)
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2006
- Location
- Hungary
Old single deck blackjack screenshot
Well I actually won both hands, but eleven cards ranked between 2-7 from a total of twelve cards usually sucks in a single deck BJ game.
Well I actually won both hands, but eleven cards ranked between 2-7 from a total of twelve cards usually sucks in a single deck BJ game.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2006
- Location
- san marino
Without words part II 
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
- Location
- Mass
Sorry Athlone ...it bites when that happens.
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2006
- Location
- Finland
Link Removed ( Old/Invalid)
Its almost there but not even close
Its almost there but not even close
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
- Location
- Mass
I didn't even know you could get more than 3 !
Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
Old Attachment (Invalid)
What on Earth?
What on Earth?
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
- Location
- Belarus
Grrrrrrr......not big bet but.....
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2006
- Location
- Isle of Man
Stinker!!! Must admit, spat the dummy a wee bit after loosing $1000 that night here. Closed my account (Have never been able to get a win at Inet) Still.... I was only giving Inet playboy casinos money. 
Closed my account (Have never been able to get a win at Inet) Still.... I was only giving Inet playboy casinos money.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
- Location
- Mass
OUCH!
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2005
- Location
- Home
Was in a gambling mood. Thinking he might have Ax so i called his reraise. Bloody hell K2 lol
Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
But you would of lost if he had A anyway?
The best you could hope for was a split pot if he had J or less no 9 no 7 no hearts no pock pair higher than 7s, Doh!
That is not gambling it is charity....or chip dumping ^ ^
The best you could hope for was a split pot if he had J or less no 9 no 7 no hearts no pock pair higher than 7s, Doh!
That is not gambling it is charity....or chip dumping ^ ^
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2005
- Location
- Pennsylvania
edit: ahh, preflop....nevermind...what a donk calling with K2
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2005
- Location
- Denmark
Since the English Harbour incident where I lost 400$( and actually never
got refunded) I have not tried to double a win in VP - until today.
17 attempts:
1 tie
2 win
14 loss
It was at Intercasino. Nothing wrong probably, just bad luck. I am not much into statistics. Can anyone
estimate probablity? It is probably not much less than 1% though.
And I do not attempt to double ever ever again. This was another lesson
So I will not improve the sample size.
In my previous VP double session at English Harbour I won about 2 out out 21 games. (that was unlucky too given the bug at least gave me 1/3 chance to win).
So this was the definitive end of my doubling attemps. I am lucky in VP though, but sucks at doubling.
The full log file is included btw:
----------------------------------------
Dealer's Card: KC
Player's Card: 4C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 4C
Player's Card: 3C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: KC
Player's Card: 9C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 10C
Player's Card: 6C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 7C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: JC
Player's Card: QC
Your payoff was $9.80
Dealer's Card: 6C
Player's Card: 5C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 10C
Player's Card: 4C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 4C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 4C
Player's Card: KC
Your payoff was $3.38
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 8C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 5C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 4C
Player's Card: 3C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 8C
Player's Card: 8C
Your payoff was $3.32
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 2C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 6C
Player's Card: 5C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: QC
Player's Card: 8C
Your payoff was $0.00
got refunded) I have not tried to double a win in VP - until today.
17 attempts:
1 tie
2 win
14 loss
It was at Intercasino. Nothing wrong probably, just bad luck. I am not much into statistics. Can anyone
estimate probablity? It is probably not much less than 1% though.
And I do not attempt to double ever ever again. This was another lesson
So I will not improve the sample size.
In my previous VP double session at English Harbour I won about 2 out out 21 games. (that was unlucky too given the bug at least gave me 1/3 chance to win).
So this was the definitive end of my doubling attemps. I am lucky in VP though, but sucks at doubling.
The full log file is included btw:
----------------------------------------
Dealer's Card: KC
Player's Card: 4C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 4C
Player's Card: 3C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: KC
Player's Card: 9C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 10C
Player's Card: 6C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 7C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: JC
Player's Card: QC
Your payoff was $9.80
Dealer's Card: 6C
Player's Card: 5C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 10C
Player's Card: 4C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 4C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 4C
Player's Card: KC
Your payoff was $3.38
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 8C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 5C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 4C
Player's Card: 3C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 8C
Player's Card: 8C
Your payoff was $3.32
Dealer's Card: AC
Player's Card: 2C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: 6C
Player's Card: 5C
Your payoff was $0.00
Dealer's Card: QC
Player's Card: 8C
Your payoff was $0.00
Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
Ahhh preflop sorry, still a strange hand though?
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2005
- Location
- Pennsylvania
Since the English Harbour incident where I lost 400$( and actually never
got refunded) I have not tried to double a win in VP - until today.
17 attempts:
1 tie
2 win
14 loss
It was at Intercasino. Nothing wrong probably, just bad luck. I am not much into statistics. Can anyone
estimate probablity? It is probably not much less than 1% though.
And I do not attempt to double ever ever again. This was another lesson
So I will not improve the sample size.
In my previous VP double session at English Harbour I won about 2 out out 21 games. (that was unlucky too given the bug at least gave me 1/3 chance to win).
So this was the definitive end of my doubling attemps. I am lucky in VP though, but sucks at doubling.
What's even more weird is the fact that every single card was a club!
Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
Old Attachment (Invalid)
Told ya I felt lucky
one of my better moments too
Told ya I felt lucky
one of my better moments too
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2006
- Location
- Hungary
I made some simplifications, but I believe that it didn't influence the results. 17 attempts:
- 2 or less wins: 0.003105799 ~= 1/322
- 3 or less wins and ties: 0,002515903 ~= 1/397
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2003
- Location
- lala land
nothing has to be THIS mean!
'Pity' party of one....your tables ready...
I was betting $1.50 until that last spin.
'Pity' party of one....your tables ready...
I was betting $1.50 until that last spin.
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2006
- Location
- Belfast, Northern Ireland
I decided to play in "Guest Mode" to see what would have happened if i had deposited another 100
Last edited:
Wind up...in Deuces Wild
No this kind of thing really winds me up...
Held 4 for a flush..no big deal and look at the cards returned one by one..
No this kind of thing really winds me up...
Held 4 for a flush..no big deal and look at the cards returned one by one..
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
The only feature it gave me in around 600 spins
What a Turd
Old Attachment (Invalid)
No win lines with 3 wilds and minimum feature payout
The minimum possible return with 3 white diamonds showing.
What a Turd
Old Attachment (Invalid)
No win lines with 3 wilds and minimum feature payout
The minimum possible return with 3 white diamonds showing.
- Joined
- May 12, 2007
- Location
- Canada
Geesh Rusty, that really sucks big time!
I even noticed where you were playing at
I even noticed where you were playing at
Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
Geesh Rusty, that really sucks big time!
I even noticed where you were playing at
Payback for complaining about the bonus
Mike031
Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Location
- not loserland *lol*
Not the minimum, because the minimum were 1x1x1x
But i also never play Diamond's Dozen on CWC, because i've also found out, that this slot doesn't work for me and the free spins comes very rarly, at most only after losing about $ 400 ($ 2 bet) and then they pay out a maximum of $ 50 *lol*
I've only noticed, that Cleopatra's Gold pays out at most on CWC and there you'll get the free spins not so rarly
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Location
- Quebec, Canada
18 free spins later...
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2006
- Location
- Norway
To bad I didnt capture the screen from 25 wagering (mag on 0.5) on Harveys, which gave me 6 free spins and ZERO payout... How nice! Infact Im glad I didnt save that screen,
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2006
- Location
- Norway
No screenshot here, however the acumulated rolling on Good to Go and Secret Admirer today, sad sad sad.
GAME - WAGER - SPINS - TOTAL WAGER - TOTAL WIN - Payout %
Good to Go | .90 | 1 | 0.90 | 10 | 1,111.11
Good to Go | 1.80 | 3 | 5.40 | 1.8 | 33.33
Good to Go | 2.70 | 12 | 32.40 | 9.6 | 29.63
Good to Go | 4.50 | 26 | 117.00 | 76.5 | 65.38
Good to Go | 7.00 | 75 | 525.00 | 147 | 28.00
Good to Go | 14.00 | 12 | 168.00 | 70 | 41.67
Overall-> 129 | 848.7 | 314.9 | 37.10
-533.80
Secret Admirer | .90 | 5 | 4.50 | 0.3 | 6.67
Secret Admirer | 1.00 | 5 | 5.00 | 0.4 | 8.00
Secret Admirer | 1.80 | 5 | 9.00 | 0 | 0.00
Secret Admirer | 2.70 | 10 | 27.00 | 4.8 | 17.78
Secret Admirer | 4.50 | 94 | 423.00 | 213.5 | 50.47
Secret Admirer | 9.00 | 7 | 63.00 | 3 | 4.76
Secret Admirer | 18.00 | 15 | 270.00 | 18 | 6.67
Overall-> 141 | 801.5 | 240 | 29.94
-561.50
GAME - WAGER - SPINS - TOTAL WAGER - TOTAL WIN - Payout %
Good to Go | .90 | 1 | 0.90 | 10 | 1,111.11
Good to Go | 1.80 | 3 | 5.40 | 1.8 | 33.33
Good to Go | 2.70 | 12 | 32.40 | 9.6 | 29.63
Good to Go | 4.50 | 26 | 117.00 | 76.5 | 65.38
Good to Go | 7.00 | 75 | 525.00 | 147 | 28.00
Good to Go | 14.00 | 12 | 168.00 | 70 | 41.67
Overall-> 129 | 848.7 | 314.9 | 37.10
-533.80
Secret Admirer | .90 | 5 | 4.50 | 0.3 | 6.67
Secret Admirer | 1.00 | 5 | 5.00 | 0.4 | 8.00
Secret Admirer | 1.80 | 5 | 9.00 | 0 | 0.00
Secret Admirer | 2.70 | 10 | 27.00 | 4.8 | 17.78
Secret Admirer | 4.50 | 94 | 423.00 | 213.5 | 50.47
Secret Admirer | 9.00 | 7 | 63.00 | 3 | 4.76
Secret Admirer | 18.00 | 15 | 270.00 | 18 | 6.67
Overall-> 141 | 801.5 | 240 | 29.94
-561.50
Mike031
Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Location
- not loserland *lol*
After losing $ 20 the free spins (2x multiplier) was triggered, but although i got 5 extra free spins (so it were 15 free spins with 2x), the payout was terrible, as you can see!
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Location
- Quebec, Canada
Fun play jackpot....
- Joined
- May 11, 2006
- Location
- North of Antarctica
Just over twice your bet - par for the course for RTG games these days. And it totally sucks.
Mike031
Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Location
- not loserland *lol*
Yes and i had also never any luck on another Slots on difference RTG Casinos, so it looks like, that they dropped their payout percentage down for this month
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- Location
- australia
What The???
Not only must you complete wagering within 24 hours and deposit before you withdraw but they had to add a ridiculous playthrough !
Not only must you complete wagering within 24 hours and deposit before you withdraw but they had to add a ridiculous playthrough !
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2005
- Location
- Pennsylvania
Not only must you complete wagering within 24 hours and deposit before you withdraw but they had to add a ridiculous playthrough !
What a joke...even for a ND bonus.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Location
- Quebec, Canada
Not only must you complete wagering within 24 hours and deposit before you withdraw but they had to add a ridiculous playthrough !
Wow what a joke !
Mike031
Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Location
- not loserland *lol*
Not only must you complete wagering within 24 hours and deposit before you withdraw but they had to add a ridiculous playthrough !
Why this? It's ONLY a 1,300x WR
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2006
- Location
- Utrecht
You should look on the bright side, assume you make this playthough.. Imagine the amount of comps..
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2003
- Location
- .
Clarification
I also received this offer from HippoJo. You play with 77 chips for a maximum of 24 hours. If your balance goes over 77 chips you may convert them for "real play", after depositing 50 chips. A maximum of 377 chips may be converted, they will deduct the 77 free chips from this, leaving 300.
After you deposit 50 chips, and convert the bonus, deposit plus bonus must be wagered 45 times.
Not only must you complete wagering within 24 hours and deposit before you withdraw but they had to add a ridiculous playthrough !
I also received this offer from HippoJo. You play with 77 chips for a maximum of 24 hours. If your balance goes over 77 chips you may convert them for "real play", after depositing 50 chips. A maximum of 377 chips may be converted, they will deduct the 77 free chips from this, leaving 300.
After you deposit 50 chips, and convert the bonus, deposit plus bonus must be wagered 45 times.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2005
- Location
- Pennsylvania
Thanks for the clarification...Sounds a little bit better, but not much.
45x WR is still a joke
Mike031
Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
- Location
- not loserland *lol*
45x WR is still a joke
Yes it is and i think that you can't fulfil this WR without losing all the money *lol*
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Location
- Quebec, Canada
35 free spins won, i really tought it was going to be great but...
- Joined
- May 11, 2006
- Location
- North of Antarctica
Baccarat
Michael Shackleford: "The smart player will bet on the banker every time..."
SlotsJunkie: "...except at RTG casinos!!"
Didn't take long to blow $500 with this kind of "luck". See where the banker won 6 hands out of the last 22? Those would be the hands where I either bet small ($1 - $5) or bet on the player (since the player was winning so often).
I'm not claiming "rigged" but it sure as hell felt like it was.
Old Attachment (Invalid)
Michael Shackleford: "The smart player will bet on the banker every time..."
SlotsJunkie: "...except at RTG casinos!!"
Didn't take long to blow $500 with this kind of "luck". See where the banker won 6 hands out of the last 22? Those would be the hands where I either bet small ($1 - $5) or bet on the player (since the player was winning so often).
I'm not claiming "rigged" but it sure as hell felt like it was.
Old Attachment (Invalid)
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2005
- Location
- Canada
This game is bloody brutal... 18 free spins and didn't even win back my bet
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2007
- Location
- Quebec, Canada
That's why i don't play MG slots, they are horrible ! RTG have the best slots.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2005
- Location
- UK
jenn1381 said:This game is bloody brutal... 18 free spins and didn't even win back my bet
That really sucks.
Tally Ho is another culprit of paying next to zilch in free spins.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2003
- Location
- Mass
Yikes Jenn ..that rots 
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2006
- Location
- canada
Michael Shackleford: "The smart player will bet on the banker every time..."
SlotsJunkie: "...except at RTG casinos!!"
Didn't take long to blow $500 with this kind of "luck". See where the banker won 6 hands out of the last 22? Those would be the hands where I either bet small ($1 - $5) or bet on the player (since the player was winning so often).
I'm not claiming "rigged" but it sure as hell felt like it was.
Old Attachment (Invalid)
the cool player follows the shoe. which makes sense because streaks are the only thing that can be counted on in a random sequence. never would the pattern go BPBPBPBPBP. the banker bet carries lower he, but maybe shoe penetration also plays into it some*. shaquille o'neal eats his losing cards when he plays. in baccarat the cards are only ever dealt out once and never used again, so the players are free to mutilate them once the hand is played out.
*EDIT: stupid! i forgot online joints probably shuffle every hand, and also that rtg apparently can deal any given hand from a stack of 1-255 decks at their whim.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2006
- Location
- TN
This sucks on many levels, firstly because I was playing for free, 2ndly because the diamond numbers were.. uh low.. oh well, at least we know the top jackpot hit.
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2005
- Location
- still progressing
my first thought was: wow, finally.... but these clumpsy wilds and top symbols realyl arranged themselves in a hopeless way... (ok: 10xbet or something, but: its one of the typical Anna Kournikowa spins- looks very nice, but earns you next to nothing)
- Joined
- May 11, 2006
- Location
- North of Antarctica
And it doesn't help that they look almost exactly like the scatter symbols until you look again.
