<div class="bbWrapper"><blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="KasinoKing" data-source="post: 323059"
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-title">
<a href="/forums/goto/post?id=323059"
class="bbCodeBlock-sourceJump"
rel="nofollow"
data-xf-click="attribution"
data-content-selector="#post-323059">KasinoKing said:</a>
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
Yes, that is correct and has never been in question.<br />
Right from the outset Rockbet said Vegas Days was their "sister" casino.<br />
<br />
Re the 400 group; To my Knowledge "RockbetJohn" never had anything to do with the running of the other 3, only This is Vegas. <br />
"JSM_Jason" looks after Paradise8 and Cocoa, while DaVinci's Gold does not have a rep on this forum.<br />
<br />
KK<br />
PS: Other linked Rival casinos:-<br />
Pantasia and Mayan Fortune.<br />
Slot Power & Vanguard.<br />
All the others are independent operations, <b>although many seem to have "global owners"</b>.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote><br />
It is looking more and more like these "global owners" are the ones pulling the strings. The individual managers, although seemingly independent, are merely "puppets" with limited authority.<br />
<br />
Look at case history patterns.<br />
<br />
Win at one (without meeting the "secret" WR), "bonus banned" at ALL.<br />
<br />
Load ONE on to a new PC, ALL accounts are locked, and it is almost IMPOSSIBLE to get individual managers to see sense.<br />
<br />
It looks like the ultimate "white label" operation, where players play AS THOUGH they are independent casinos, and THEN get into trouble for it.<br />
<br />
If you won BIG at, say, Casino Rewards off a bonus, you may well be "bonus banned" at all Casino Rewards casinos, but you would be IN SHOCK if you found yourself "bonus banned" at "all casinos powered by Microgaming".<br />
<br />
Take this chat from the OP<br />
<br />
<blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="" data-source=""
class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-content">
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent ">
laurie: hi its laurie, i needed to know if you guys are a sister casino to vegas days and rockbet casino<br />
laurie: hi robert<br />
Robert: We provide support for all Rival powered casinos, and those casinos you just mentioned are all Rival powered.<br />
laurie: so its just for support then<br />
laurie: ok<br />
laurie: is john the manager of those 3 casinos<br />
laurie: john wright<br />
laurie: i have accounts at all 3<br />
Robert: No each casino has it's own management. We simply provide the support. <br />
laurie: ok ty robert<br />
laurie: have a great day<br />
laurie: bye now<br />
Robert: You are very welcome.<br />
Robert: Have a nice day.<br />
Robert: Thank you for visiting. Please contact us at any time.
</div>
<div class="bbCodeBlock-expandLink js-expandLink"><a role="button" tabindex="0">Click to expand...</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote><br />
Plenty of answers from support, and correct ones too, but the QUESTION was NOT ANSWERED, instead support tried to obfuscate the original issue by talking about who did "support", and how they were "independently managed" (which merely means each one has a different figurehead).<br />
<br />
The big "global owner" seems to be Bonne Chance, who are "the 888.com of powered by Rival", just as 888.com ultimately own and run all the Cassava skins, which AGAIN means trouble for players who THINK they are playing at a number of INDEPENDENT casinos merely "powered by Cassava".<br />
<br />
I have noted that the phrase "Powered by Rival" is now used, rather than just "Rival", just an attempt to FURTHER obfuscate the fact that almost everything is managed centrally from this insidious "central database".</div>