Global Player Casino - Blah

[LetsGoBowl]

I looked thru the accredited casinos on here and found Global Player Casino. Wasn't impressed with the layout nor was I impressed with their blackjack. I literally must have won 1 out of 10 hands (maybe). All I know is I deposited $50, $100 & $200 and won one time...that bites.

 

[Westland Bowl]

Global Player can be very streaky. They do not shuffle the deck after every hand so there is a possibility of card-counting there. As a result, the wagering window is very narrow. I'm not a card-counter nor do I like their narrow wager window so I quit playing there.

On the positive side, Global Player has an excellent Blackjack tourmanents, so I'm told.

 

[tim5ny]

All I know is I deposited $50, $100 & $200 and won one time...that bites.

How many sessions do you expect to win out of three? I must be missing something here.

 

[LetsGoBowl]

I'm just sayin...out of the 10+ hands that I played, I won once. I can't remember the last time I did that bad off of blackjack. I had the BJ window open and deposited so it was the same game played throughout my session. That sucks!

How many sessions do you expect to win out of three? I must be missing something here.

 

[bpb]

I'm just sayin...out of the 10+ hands that I played, I won once. I can't remember the last time I did that bad off of blackjack. I had the BJ window open and deposited so it was the same game played throughout my session. That sucks!

So are you complaining about your bad luck? Or are you saying that the casino is rigged. Because if you're claiming it's rigged, 10 hands is just a tad low of a sample size. You need to play at least 17 hands before claiming someplace is rigged.

 

[gfkostas]

You need to play at least 17 hands before claiming someplace is rigged.

You gotta be kidding me

 

[LetsGoBowl]

I'm complaining about my bad luck. I think you may be over-analyzing the situation. I'm just saying that out of the hands that I played, to only win ONCE was pretty crappy. That sucks hardcore. BTW, I never said the place was rigged..whatchu talkin bout, Willis?

So are you complaining about your bad luck? Or are you saying that the casino is rigged. Because if you're claiming it's rigged, 10 hands is just a tad low of a sample size. You need to play at least 17 hands before claiming someplace is rigged.

 

[caruso]

You gotta be kidding me

17 straight losing hands would be a reasonable case for rigged software. Personally, I would say 15 straight would be near enough.

 

[gfkostas]

17 straight losing hands would be a reasonable case for rigged software. Personally, I would say 15 straight would be near enough.

My point was that there is no way a software can be proved with 17 hands of log.But he meant otherwise so my mistake.