1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Global Player Casino - Blah

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by LetsGoBowl, Mar 8, 2006.

    Mar 8, 2006
  1. LetsGoBowl

    LetsGoBowl Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    I looked thru the accredited casinos on here and found Global Player Casino. Wasn't impressed with the layout nor was I impressed with their blackjack. I literally must have won 1 out of 10 hands (maybe). All I know is I deposited $50, $100 & $200 and won one time...that bites.
     
  2. Mar 8, 2006
  3. Westland Bowl

    Westland Bowl Tin Foil Hat Club Member CAG PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    not applicable
    Location:
    America
    Global Player can be very streaky. They do not shuffle the deck after every hand so there is a possibility of card-counting there. As a result, the wagering window is very narrow. I'm not a card-counter nor do I like their narrow wager window so I quit playing there.

    On the positive side, Global Player has an excellent Blackjack tourmanents, so I'm told.
     
  4. Mar 8, 2006
  5. tim5ny

    tim5ny Quit Gambling

    How many sessions do you expect to win out of three? :what: I must be missing something here.
     
  6. Mar 8, 2006
  7. LetsGoBowl

    LetsGoBowl Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    I'm just sayin...out of the 10+ hands that I played, I won once. I can't remember the last time I did that bad off of blackjack. I had the BJ window open and deposited so it was the same game played throughout my session. That sucks!


     
  8. Mar 8, 2006
  9. bpb

    bpb Banned User - repeated violations of rule 1.14 (tr PABnorogue PABnonaccred

    Location:
    Haverhill
    So are you complaining about your bad luck? Or are you saying that the casino is rigged. Because if you're claiming it's rigged, 10 hands is just a tad low of a sample size. You need to play at least 17 hands before claiming someplace is rigged.
     
  10. Mar 10, 2006
  11. gfkostas

    gfkostas Ex-Bonus Whore

    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    UK
    :what: You gotta be kidding me
     
  12. Mar 10, 2006
  13. LetsGoBowl

    LetsGoBowl Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Orange County, California
    I'm complaining about my bad luck. I think you may be over-analyzing the situation. I'm just saying that out of the hands that I played, to only win ONCE was pretty crappy. That sucks hardcore. BTW, I never said the place was rigged..whatchu talkin bout, Willis?


     
  14. Mar 10, 2006
  15. caruso

    caruso Banned User - repetitive violations of 1.6 - troll

    Occupation:
    Casino apologist
    Location:
    England
    17 straight losing hands would be a reasonable case for rigged software. Personally, I would say 15 straight would be near enough.
     
  16. Mar 12, 2006
  17. gfkostas

    gfkostas Ex-Bonus Whore

    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    UK
    My point was that there is no way a software can be proved with 17 hands of log.But he meant otherwise so my mistake.
     

Share This Page