Played medal tally (i think that was the name) at highnoon today for the first time and noticed you have to bet 1.00...no more....no less... I found this interesting in that you couldn't increase the bet amount. I've seen games that require you to start with a high bet amount say 1.25 but allowed you to increase the amount.
Part of me was actually happy and I'm not sure if it's a false sense of security. Knowing that every player had to use the same bet amount, gave me an odd sense of delight. Now don't get me wrong I'm not saying all games should be like this.
I was curious to know how others felt. I know some have trigger jackpots with .20 bets but it's easy to slip into the mindset that "the guy who will hit will probably bet larger than me." Yes I know that line of thinking isn't true but for some reason playing a game that restricted the bet size to a single amount was kind of cool.
RJ size was at 16K and we hit 3 features in the span of something like 5 -10 minutes and they actually all paid decent amounts . Which leads me to another question. Do you feel the bigger the jackpot has grown the more chances for decent hits/features, etc?
Part of me was actually happy and I'm not sure if it's a false sense of security. Knowing that every player had to use the same bet amount, gave me an odd sense of delight. Now don't get me wrong I'm not saying all games should be like this.
I was curious to know how others felt. I know some have trigger jackpots with .20 bets but it's easy to slip into the mindset that "the guy who will hit will probably bet larger than me." Yes I know that line of thinking isn't true but for some reason playing a game that restricted the bet size to a single amount was kind of cool.
RJ size was at 16K and we hit 3 features in the span of something like 5 -10 minutes and they actually all paid decent amounts . Which leads me to another question. Do you feel the bigger the jackpot has grown the more chances for decent hits/features, etc?