- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
- Location
- Belarus
Hello forum heads,
Today I was reading about “bad bonuses” – you even could find my few posts regarding this issue – and sudden thought came into my mind: what if there could be bonuses with “floating” wagering requirements? By saying “floating” I mean that the amount to be wagered depends on the bet size.
As an example I took common 100% up to $100 Welcome Bonus, for slots only. Let’s say the player deposited $100 and received $100 bonus. So, based on their bet size, the wagering requirements would be the following:
For $0.25 stake – 25x(bonus) = $2500 to wager.
For $0.5 stake – 24x(bonus) = $2400 to wager.
For $1 stake – 22x(bonus) = $2200 to wager.
For $2 stake – 20x(bonus) = $2000 to wager.
For $5 stake – 18x(bonus) = $1800 to wager.
So, with larger bet size player will have less WR, but their chances to bust are increasing. All numbers are given as an example!
If player wants to play with different bet sizes, their WR will change accordingly. For example, player made $300 in bets with $0.25 stake ($2500 - $300 = $2200 to go) and then decide to up their bets to $0.5. According to the WR table, they will have to complete $2112 instead of $2200 and so on.
For $1 stake they will have to complete $1936 instead of $2200.
As I said, with such bonus players could vary their WR, but their chances to bust will increase with the bet size. So they will be able to select how to play: more safely but with more WR, or more risky but with less WR.
Any opinions? Thanks!
P.S. I don’t know, maybe someone somewhere proposed something similar, but I didn’t find it. And until someone provide me with the link – I will consider it as my own idea
Today I was reading about “bad bonuses” – you even could find my few posts regarding this issue – and sudden thought came into my mind: what if there could be bonuses with “floating” wagering requirements? By saying “floating” I mean that the amount to be wagered depends on the bet size.
As an example I took common 100% up to $100 Welcome Bonus, for slots only. Let’s say the player deposited $100 and received $100 bonus. So, based on their bet size, the wagering requirements would be the following:
For $0.25 stake – 25x(bonus) = $2500 to wager.
For $0.5 stake – 24x(bonus) = $2400 to wager.
For $1 stake – 22x(bonus) = $2200 to wager.
For $2 stake – 20x(bonus) = $2000 to wager.
For $5 stake – 18x(bonus) = $1800 to wager.
So, with larger bet size player will have less WR, but their chances to bust are increasing. All numbers are given as an example!
If player wants to play with different bet sizes, their WR will change accordingly. For example, player made $300 in bets with $0.25 stake ($2500 - $300 = $2200 to go) and then decide to up their bets to $0.5. According to the WR table, they will have to complete $2112 instead of $2200 and so on.
For $1 stake they will have to complete $1936 instead of $2200.
As I said, with such bonus players could vary their WR, but their chances to bust will increase with the bet size. So they will be able to select how to play: more safely but with more WR, or more risky but with less WR.
Any opinions? Thanks!
P.S. I don’t know, maybe someone somewhere proposed something similar, but I didn’t find it. And until someone provide me with the link – I will consider it as my own idea