Betsson 2000 d loss on 0.1 roulette(no rollover)

catcat941

catcat
MM
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Location
sofia
Since it happened in a 20 years of playing ,i feel obliged to post it to my fellow gamblers
and let them decide judge for themselves . that very odd happening . those who question this post i will send them bank statments pscreen . Also no bonus was entitled during deposits .
 
Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe there is a $10k max bet on those tables, so in theory you comfortably do it in one spin.

Were you using the martingale staking plan?
 
i used several system , ofcourse during bets i did use 50 or so bet increasing, its possible to put more than 10 d ,its a fairly new low stake roullete as they call it .
 
i used several system , ofcourse during bets i did use 50 or so bet increasing, its possible to put more than 10 d ,its a fairly new low stake roullete as they call it .

There's your problem in a nutshell. Systems don't work, the maths says so. The only time a roulette system will work is if there is a bias in the wheel or software. Online operators are very keen to ensure their maths is as close as it can be to true randomness.

Despite this, there have been numerous cases of casinos trying to void a win on the grounds a player "used a system" and therefore the win isn't legitimate. The side effect of this is that it encourages a belief in systems. Systems are purely for entertainment, they should not be relied upon to make money, nor trusted to the extent that a player will lose more than they can afford in the mistaken belief that the system will eventually produce a profit if they stick at it long enough.

Martingale is a particularly dangerous system to blindly follow through as random chance can occasionally result in runs of 12+ of the same colour, which will bankrupt someone playing Martingale before their colour can show up to bring them back to even. I saw this on a TV casino the other day, a complete run of reds across the bottom of the screen, then another red came in on the spin. The only black number was right at the start of the run of reds, so this was easily a run of 10+ reds.
 
thnks man , but casinos trying to void a win on the grounds a player "used a system" , r rough and thats it since there really isnt any system
 
i used several system , ofcourse during bets i did use 50 or so bet increasing, its possible to put more than 10 d ,its a fairly new low stake roullete as they call it .

By $10k, I mean ten thousand dollars.

Yeah, using a negative progression is useful for quick profits in a short time, but I don't like to do it for more than ten minutes or so, only while the trend is favourable, because the trend will eventually turn against you, regardless of which table you are playing on.

I have found that the only martingale that will provide safe steady profits is by covering just a single number straight up, doubling my stakes after 18 losers, but even then I have to listen to that inner voice that is telling me that this is going nowhere, and to come back later. Although because it is such a slow progression, you can stop at any time and try again later.

Too bad about your loss bro'. That's painful.:(
 
Last edited:
Hi there.

I was reading the Terms of several online casinos and they are entitled to refuse a paid out arguing that the player use “a system or strategy”.

How is that fair? I mean there is not any 100% sure system, its gambling.

Its like they have the last vote to refuse your winnings when you get lucky.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top