A clarifying for stickg and all ,
Thanks your replies i will clarify again .
i am not talking here affiliate abuse . affiliate abuse is affiliate abuse .
i believe most members and casino owners refer affiliate abuse in the same meaning ( affiliate owner plays himself from his own link from another computer , under another name and such . or another person plays from the same ip that affiliate web is based , etc . (( but obviously isnt it the true right of an affiliate to earn something from persuading his her friend from the registered link ? ))
What i ment here is in a way a case similar to what happened with a girl player who was underage , posted in meister forum , and claimed , if she was allowed depositing ,despite she registered her minor age and playing , why did the casino make obstacles when she was winning nice money ? pls correct me if i am wrong i read this regardin monaco casino , i dont remember how it ended . )
So i will try clarifying - o n the terms that casino published an affiliate should not participate in a game , both from his own link and IN GENERAL , (THAT i didnt i did not understand myself ) , one can imply that the casino reserve a right to revoke withrawl from a person who is registered as an affiliate , but plays (from meister link for example) as a gambler .
So i am saying ,an affiliate ,who is also a gambler n, if he she should not bet in that casino ,according to the casino terms , - than iN A CASE THAT HE REGISTERED A PLAYER ACCOUNT(NOT FROM HIS OWN LINK) AND GAMBLE
,AND LOSES , CAN HE SAY - " IF I SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PLAY AT THE FIRST PLACE , WHILE THE CASINO MIGHT "HAD THE RIGHT" TO HOLD WINNINGS , THAN I SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO CLAIM BACK LOSSES , SINCE THE CASINO ALLOWED THE GAMMING " ?
i hope the post is more clear now and i will carefully read the replyies .
there may be a case here .