Casinos

Casinos By Status

Popular Filters

By Banking Options

Games

All Games

Bonuses

Popular Bonus Filters

Forums

Popular Forums

Forum User Features

Complaints

Submit A Complaint (PAB)

PAB Rules and Guidelines

Browse PABs

Gambling News

Popular News Sections

About Us

About Us

Winner Videos!

I wasn't really in a good mood when i got this win, I did deposit £200 and was just doing 50p a spin on Novomatics at Betspin but i couldn't trigger the Free Spins before this slot i had tried Book of Ra Deluxe, Dolphin's Pearl Deluxe, Lucky Lady's Charm, Lord of The Ocean and Pharoah's Tomb but just couldn't get anything on them.

I did get Free spins on this slot about 10 spins before this and it was one of the picture symbols but it didn't give me one two of a kind, So when this Free Spins triggered and i saw the symbol i had i wasn't happy but it turned out to be a really good bonus.

I withdrew after i got this hit i won't saw how much or i may as well just tell you how much i won and that was just spoil the video, I have also uploaded some other videos to my Youtube channel of wins from some other Novomatic Slots.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
dunover said:
Do you know that if he'd got Sarah/Wild on reels 2&4 too (he had them on 1,3,5) that it would have been the second-highest possible hit after a 5-reel Wild Desire?

There is a screenie of that hit I just described on here somewhere, but not in the 5x Amber spins!
Click to expand...

I don't think that's entirely true Mr. D. And you know that I wouldn't query something you say without good reason.
I'll get back to that in a moment.

As for the hit you were talking about, I remember the name of the CM member who got it (awesomexd). I know it's somewhere, but it might be in the old Winners Screenie thread...and that's 3,601 pages long...so I ain't gonna start looking for it lol).

Anyhow, to the best of my knowledge, the perfect base game hit of 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs and 5 Nines would pay £381 on a 30p bet....

1 x 5OAK of Wilds (£15)
1 x Natural 5OAK of Sarah (£5)
30 x 5OAKs of Sarah with wild (@ £10 each - £300)
1 x Natural 5OAK of Nines (£1)
30 x 5OAKs of Nines with wild (@ £2 each - £60)

Total £381 - 1,270x bet.

Get that in the Amber feature and it becomes £1,905 - 6,350x bet, a little over 50% of the maximum win possible (12,150x bet on a 5-reel WD).

Now to get back to the second-highest possible hit debate....surely the second-highest win possible is 14 wild vines with a Sarah on Reel 5?
EG 3x3x3x3x2 = 162 ways @ £15 = £2,430 (8,100x bet) PLUS 81 ways @ £5 = £405 (£1,350x bet) - for a total win of £2,835 (9,450x bet).

I'd even be prepared to argue that 13 wild vines (depending on what the other 2 symbols are) could better the ultimate Amber feature hit.
 
mcgameboy said:
I don't think that's entirely true Mr. D. And you know that I wouldn't query something you say without good reason.
I'll get back to that in a moment.

As for the hit you were talking about, I remember the name of the CM member who got it (awesomexd). I know it's somewhere, but it might be in the old Winners Screenie thread...and that's 3,601 pages long...so I ain't gonna start looking for it lol).

Anyhow, to the best of my knowledge, the perfect base game hit of 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs and 5 Nines would pay £381 on a 30p bet....

1 x 5OAK of Wilds (£15)
1 x Natural 5OAK of Sarah (£5)
30 x 5OAKs of Sarah with wild (@ £10 each - £300)
1 x Natural 5OAK of Nines (£1)
30 x 5OAKs of Nines with wild (@ £2 each - £60)

Total £381 - 1,270x bet.

Get that in the Amber feature and it becomes £1,905 - 6,350x bet, a little over 50% of the maximum win possible (12,150x bet on a 5-reel WD).

Now to get back to the second-highest possible hit debate....surely the second-highest win possible is 14 wild vines with a Sarah on Reel 5?
EG 3x3x3x3x2 = 162 ways @ £15 = £2,430 (8,100x bet) PLUS 81 ways @ £5 = £405 (£1,350x bet) - for a total win of £2,835 (9,450x bet).

I'd even be prepared to argue that 13 wild vines (depending on what the other 2 symbols are) could better the ultimate Amber feature hit.
Click to expand...

A point of order - the game pays HIGHEST WIN per way, so 4x Wilds pays 50 as opposed to 5x doubled 9's paying 40.

Secondly are you sure the Wild vine wilds double?
It appears not? https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...cal-sarah-bonus-screen-shot-wild-vines.59642/
https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...ns-very-cold-for-me-anyone-notice-that.48085/
5x Wild vines is only half the pay of 5 of the usual reel Wilds.
Durst thou question dunover, the all-seeing eye of the slots?
 
Jono777 said:
@ Mr McGameboy :p

This will probably come back to bite me on the arse but with you Sarah/wild/'9' breakdown...

Isn't it 31 x 5OAK with wild. not 30?

2x2x2x2x2 = 32 - 1 (Natural 5OAK with no wild)

Grand total £393 (on 0.30p bet) or 1310 x stake!
Click to expand...

No, he's got that bit right because:

Wild/Sarah each reel = 2x2x2x2x2 = 32 combos.

One will be the 5 natural Wilds, the other 5 Natural Sarahs. The other 30 will be Wild/Sarah combos.

There is also a screenie somewhere on here where the player got the full Wild Vine screen, but he took the screenie via the MG Logs so it was in those funny pictures.
It paid just over 6000x IIRC.
 
Jono777 said:
Sweet, SWEET hit matey :thumbsup:

I play this slot every session now, not major heavy but every session, had lots of features, tried all the animal choices and not even managed a tenth of that hit lol :o :o
Click to expand...

Same as you mate, Till last week it usually just paid 30 - 50 quid on a 40 - 60p Bonus round. But when this beauty dropped in. My jaw was dropped. haha

But yeah it can be so brutal in the base game with 100's of dead spins. Makes dead or alive seem low variance :)
 
dunover said:
A point of order - the game pays HIGHEST WIN per way, so 4x Wilds pays 50 as opposed to 5x doubled 9's paying 40.
Click to expand...

I agree that a 4OAK of wilds (£2.50 on 30p bet) pays more than a 5OAK of 9s with wild (£2 on a 30p net). No argument with you there.

However, I have to ask, how many "way wins" (in the base game and Amber feature only) would have 4 wilds on the first four reels?
Surely (in the base game 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs, 9 Nines example I used at least) it is only three? And if so, two of those wouldn't even count anyway, because one would be the 5OAK of wilds and another would be the 5OAK of Sarah, both of which pay higher than a 4OAK of wilds.

So basically, I can't see the win of £381 for 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs and 5 Nines being increased by any more than 50p.

dunover said:
Secondly are you sure the Wild vine wilds double?
It appears not? https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...cal-sarah-bonus-screen-shot-wild-vines.59642/
https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...ns-very-cold-for-me-anyone-notice-that.48085/
Click to expand...

Wild Vines definitely do not double the win. Only doubling wilds can double the win. And I didn't even need to see those examples to know that.
You are probably well aware that I am an avid IR player, a bit of a stattophile, and I like to play on MG Viper (which has MG Playcheck - a handy tool for in itself for reference purposes). I don't just assume I've been paid the correct win, I like to know I've been paid the correct win AND also try to understand why as well.

dunover said:
5x Wild vines is only half the pay of 5 of the usual reel Wilds.
Click to expand...

I don't believe that is the case. If what you are saying is correct, then wouldn't that mean a full screen of wild vines/wines/magic pays only half of what a 5-reel WD/WC/WS pays? That sounds very iffy to me. However, if it is the case, then my argument falls flat on it's face and I'm eating several slices of humble pie.

I was under the impression that ANY 5OAK of Wilds, regardless of composition - IE 5-reel WD, 5 doubling wilds (with 1 on each reel) , 5 wild vines (with 1 on each reel) or a mixture of wild wines and doubling wilds (with one of either on each reel) - pays the same amount...50x bet (£15 on 30p bet).

Unfortunately, I have never managed to get a "way" of 5 wild vines, only a way of 5 wilds (mixture of vines and standard doubling wilds), so I can't be sure either way. Again though, if I have that wrong, I will apologise.

dunover said:
Durst thou question dunover, the all-seeing eye of the slots?
Click to expand...

Aye I doth questioneth dunover, thine all-seeing eye of all things slotteth. Cuz it's good craic innit? Excuse the sudden dialect change :o :p

Besides, if I don't question things, then I don't learn anything. So I hope you'll forgive me for questioning you, your magnificence. :p

However, I wish to clarify my reasons for questioning you in the first place....

1. MG 243 ways slots have that quirky characteristic to them. In that they can pay up to 324 way wins
(on a 4 reel WD with the first four reels turned wild). It can also pay 270 way wins on a 4 reel WD (with reels 1, 2, 3 and 5 turned wild).

2. The Sarah feature can exploit this, because of the potential for full reels to be turned wild, albeit "one square at a time",
rather than one reel at a time.

But the base game, and therefore the Amber feature, cannot do this. It can only go up to 63 way wins (such as the 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs, 5 Nines example I used in my previous post). And nearly half of those 63 way wins involve the use of the weakest paying symbol.

Those factors enable the Sarah feature to have the potential to even outdo the dream Amber hit with a 5x multiplier.
But the window for outdoing it is still very narrow....12 wild vines across the first 4 reels (with 3 high paying symbols on the fifth reel) would have to be an absolute minimum requirement.

But of course, all of this hinges on what a way win of 5 wild vines pays. If it's £15 on a 30p bet, I'm good. If it's only £7.50, I'm a fucking idiot.
 
mcgameboy said:
I agree that a 4OAK of wilds (£2.50 on 30p bet) pays more than a 5OAK of 9s with wild (£2 on a 30p net). No argument with you there.

However, I have to ask, how many "way wins" (in the base game and Amber feature only) would have 4 wilds on the first four reels?
Surely (in the base game 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs, 9 Nines example I used at least) it is only three? And if so, two of those wouldn't even count anyway, because one would be the 5OAK of wilds and another would be the 5OAK of Sarah, both of which pay higher than a 4OAK of wilds.

So basically, I can't see the win of £381 for 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs and 5 Nines being increased by any more than 50p.



Wild Vines definitely do not double the win. Only doubling wilds can double the win. And I didn't even need to see those examples to know that.
You are probably well aware that I am an avid IR player, a bit of a stattophile, and I like to play on MG Viper (which has MG Playcheck - a handy tool for in itself for reference purposes). I don't just assume I've been paid the correct win, I like to know I've been paid the correct win AND also try to understand why as well.



I don't believe that is the case. If what you are saying is correct, then wouldn't that mean a full screen of wild vines/wines/magic pays only half of what a 5-reel WD/WC/WS pays? That sounds very iffy to me. However, if it is the case, then my argument falls flat on it's face and I'm eating several slices of humble pie.

I was under the impression that ANY 5OAK of Wilds, regardless of composition - IE 5-reel WD, 5 doubling wilds (with 1 on each reel) , 5 wild vines (with 1 on each reel) or a mixture of wild wines and doubling wilds (with one of either on each reel) - pays the same amount...50x bet (£15 on 30p bet).

Unfortunately, I have never managed to get a "way" of 5 wild vines, only a way of 5 wilds (mixture of vines and standard doubling wilds), so I can't be sure either way. Again though, if I have that wrong, I will apologise.



Aye I doth questioneth dunover, thine all-seeing eye of all things slotteth. Cuz it's good craic innit? Excuse the sudden dialect change :o :p

Besides, if I don't question things, then I don't learn anything. So I hope you'll forgive me for questioning you, your magnificence. :p

However, I wish to clarify my reasons for questioning you in the first place....

1. MG 243 ways slots have that quirky characteristic to them. In that they can pay up to 324 way wins
(on a 4 reel WD with the first four reels turned wild). It can also pay 270 way wins on a 4 reel WD (with reels 1, 2, 3 and 5 turned wild).

2. The Sarah feature can exploit this, because of the potential for full reels to be turned wild, albeit "one square at a time",
rather than one reel at a time.

But the base game, and therefore the Amber feature, cannot do this. It can only go up to 63 way wins (such as the 5 Wilds, 5 Sarahs, 5 Nines example I used in my previous post). And nearly half of those 63 way wins involve the use of the weakest paying symbol.

Those factors enable the Sarah feature to have the potential to even outdo the dream Amber hit with a 5x multiplier.
But the window for outdoing it is still very narrow....12 wild vines across the first 4 reels (with 3 high paying symbols on the fifth reel) would have to be an absolute minimum requirement.

But of course, all of this hinges on what a way win of 5 wild vines pays. If it's £15 on a 30p bet, I'm good. If it's only £7.50, I'm a fucking idiot.
Click to expand...

Yes, I can attest to the 324-ways after my 4-reel shitstorm on TS2. I don't think WV's do this though - I believe this quirk is an error where it occurs only on doubling Wilds in the SS or WD feature as the programmer or game for some reason knows the 4 doubling wilds alone can exceed some 5OAK wins with wilds i.e.9's so counts the 81 of those, then realizes there is a 5OAK win too and double-counts those combos.

A wild vine line pays £7.50 - I have seen this because (somewhere) in the screenies is a shot from the Viper game logs and it pays 6075x bet or something for 15 of them. If you find this you find resolution.

The WV feature doesn't count any wins as we know, until the WV's are overlaid. Jono reckons the WV still pays double awards IF the WV overlays a normal wild, but I'm not so sure as when it does it on the Troy/Odin features it removes the doubling and replaces it with its own multiplier of 2 or 3x and forgets it.

Having said all that it MIGHT be possible (now I say 'might' because I am not sure the Wild Vine can fill 2 positions on reel 1 without filling complete reels in addition) to land the 4 natural Wilds reels 1,2,4,5 and the WV reel 3 and by a sheer miracle the WV turns ALL of reel 3 Wild, and on all the rest the 2 positions that aren't doubling wilds. So reels 1,2,4,5 will have a doubling Wild and WV's, and the centre reel 3 WV's. Now IF this combo exceeds your total for the dream Amber hit x stake in your estimation, then you have the answer to this riddle.....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
suomikala87 said:
After years of playing RR got my first four wilds during the free spins. Was it worth the wait? :what:



Where is a Rhino when you need him? Nice hit although that first spin was definitely spew worthy. Rhino can be a tight git when he wants even with the four wilds.:p
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dunover said:
A short 30-min movie of Microgaming Mayhem. Check the monster Thunderstruck 2 hit out!




Good hits but.

Dont you get sick n tired of this BS lag before every winning spin. The knowing that a spin is going to deliver nothing because it did not lag ?
How the hell in this day and age , with all the money that these companies are making, with modern tech, Superfast Broadband ETC ETC How can they NOT deliver a smooth gaming experience.

It seems that every platform/Provider/Software/Company is taking the P*ss!
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
mcgameboy said:
Oh look, the "maestro" has returned. :rolleyes:

Go away, idiot.
Click to expand...

The micro is fine, it's just that different casinos have different levels on their sounds. I could leave the volume on 20 say, and play the same game at another site and it won't reduce the commentary level like it did here. I don't usually adjust the levels before embarking on a new video, just keep my settings at what I consider an 'optimum' amount and yes, sometimes this isn't as good as would like it to be.
 
simonvselton said:
buy a new micro. Its really shit
Click to expand...

I presume that everyone wishing to post a video should first employ a Foley artist,a Gaffa, Grip,Key Grip, Dolly Grip,Best Boy and a Child Wrangler for the recording of Raging Rhino and Jungle slots?
Not forgetting a Fluffer for Pimped,Playboy and such?
:eek:
 

Similar threads

Webzcas
New Grey Zone Casino Review Mr Slot Casino
Replies
1
Views
267
Mr Shine
Mr Shine
YouTubeSlots
Upcoming Release (Raging Rhino Double Danger)
Replies
15
Views
915
thediro
T
ChopleyIOM
New Slot Announcement New 3Dice Slot - 'AZTEC GOLD', it's like Dead Or Alive, but better!
Replies
22
Views
2K
ChopleyIOM
ChopleyIOM
conker
Expired Promo Casinomeister Exclusive EUR1000 Slots Legends Multiplier Demo Comp
5 6 7
Replies
308
Views
9K
johnnymcc1966
J
Nate
Scam Spotters The $100 Verification Trap: When Deposits Become Theft
Replies
0
Views
332
Nate
Nate

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top