Expired Promo L&L Europe Unlucky Leaderboard Promo

There are promos that are no more.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah damn, so Yako does not have such a thing?
I'd love to be able to save up some funds especially after a losing session.

In that case you need to get to used to either CasinoCasino or NoBonusCasino :)

I'll consider it though after the launch of Yako.

I expect new Yako goes live early next week.

Kr. Jan
 
Are we getting a leaderboard update this week :)

yes mate in a bit, releasing new high5game now, "Goldstruck" and will update leaderboard after.

That game is actually pretty cool, if you want to play something different.

Kr.
 
Yes but we are looking at Q1 for that mate, including the other merkurs.
 
Does the 500 spins requirement start from this week, the next one or next month?

not decided yet so rules as they are still applies.
 
It was only a question guys - dont hate me :)
 
In that case you need to get to used to either CasinoCasino or NoBonusCasino :)

I'll consider it though after the launch of Yako.

I expect new Yako goes live early next week.

Kr. Jan
Jan
I have account at Yako but I have never deposited was going to deposit today to avail of the deposit bonus but it’s not on my account could u have a look at this.
Cheers
 
Jan
I have account at Yako but I have never deposited was going to deposit today to avail of the deposit bonus but it’s not on my account could u have a look at this.
Cheers

Bonus option was disabled due to duplicate IP address, now your account is enabled and bonuses wallet as well!

Good luck!
 
I felt the way you had the promo was perfectly fine the way it was.


I’m sure you thought it was fine when you played to the rules so expertly! Lol

It’s not really in the casinos best interest to have players who top this leaderboard for the first two weeks and then stay away (prob depositing at rival casinos instead) until month end as then they are sure fire first place £250 winners.


I bet you daren't post your total deposits at L&L for October alongside the amount won in weekly+monthly prizes.

;)
Maybe the monthly prize should be reduced or redistributed to include top 5 or more winners.

This might reduce the lure of trying to get away with depositing £20/£40 with smart slot choices (at mostly 50p stakes) in order to hit minimum number of spins and then walking away £250-£350 prize money.

anyone happily spinning away without a set game play will rack up their spin count and the more spins we do, the Moore likely we are to gravitate towards to 97.4% or whatever the overall rtp is.
 
Hi Babe ;)

Please send me a PM and Ill tackel verification on all accounts tomorrow.

Please keep in mind that if your proof of address is older as 3 months I would need a new one.

So before the weekend everyting is verified and you can safely play at Fun, Yako or All British while knowing your withdrawal will be processed.

Kr. Jan

Thanks for that.
It’s a busy old week for me here so I will PM you over the weekend with details x
 
Think you should do minimum spins per week defo.

Otherwise if somebody gains an advantage they will just do a spin or two to keep the percentage down.

An unlucky leaderboard should be based on luck or 'unluck' :) otherwise its the 'skilful percentage manipulation' leaderboard.

Hear! Hear!

My suggestion would be 10p/spin minimum.
A 500 spin minimum for weekly and 2000 minimum for the monthly would make it harder, or atleast alot more expensive to "cheat" the system. I mean, who wants to do 500 spins with 30% rtp.
 
Hear! Hear!

My suggestion would be 10p/spin minimum.
A 500 spin minimum for weekly and 2000 minimum for the monthly would make it harder, or atleast alot more expensive to "cheat" the system. I mean, who wants to do 500 spins with 30% rtp.

What about the high rollers though? They might find it a bit tedious low rolling.

Also, I know this has been asked but why are there not more people jumping on this. Just sign up if you play on L&L.......

come on ! lets be avin you!

 
What about the high rollers though? They might find it a bit tedious low rolling.

Also, I know this has been asked but why are there not more people jumping on this. Just sign up if you play on L&L.......

come on ! lets be avin you!



It would just be minimum, its not like €2 spins would not count.
It was more to avoid people playing 500 1p spins on pimped for example.
Im up for making the min bet per spin 20p aswell, higher than that and i will not be able to take part with my small gambling-budget. :P


No matter what stake you normally play at, making 500 spins in a week is not a very hard thing to accomplish.
 
How about instead of minimum spins, no updates during the week?
As if on Friday my RTP is 5%, I’m not spinning again. Keep it truly fair and nobody knows until Monday.

But without a spin minimum to meet, its not like anything would change?
Figuring out your rtp on 100 spins made is not very hard. =)
 
yeah I'm not sure I would like a 500 spin minimum, Jan already said he might exclude anyone obviously playing to win rather than playing normally. I didn't hit 500 spins this week, despite spending over £100 and playing normally at mainly 50p stakes. As long as people aren't taking the piss I think the current rules are fine. If anyone is taking the piss and making min deposits and min spins just to win, then they should just get excluded.
 
yeah I'm not sure I would like a 500 spin minimum, Jan already said he might exclude anyone obviously playing to win rather than playing normally. I didn't hit 500 spins this week, despite spending over £100 and playing normally at mainly 50p stakes. As long as people aren't taking the piss I think the current rules are fine. If anyone is taking the piss and making min deposits and min spins just to win, then they should just get excluded.
Agree. I deposit £20 or so a week. I usually play Bonanza at 40p stakes. Sometimes I hit 500 spins. Sometimes I don’t.
 
This thread is starting to look a bit silly, it's all people moaning about who deposits and what games they play. First thing. It's got nothing to do with anyone in here how much any individual deposits per week day or month. Second it also got nothing to do with anyone in here what games these people like to play. The rules are clear, very clear. Minimum 100 10p spins per week for the weekly. 250 10p spins for the monthly. Its a competition guys come on, it's fair its set out properly. I'm seeing a lot of winners who don't usually get the chance to win decent comps, it's an rtp comp not a highest x comp.
 
Think you should do minimum spins per week defo.

Otherwise if somebody gains an advantage they will just do a spin or two to keep the percentage down.

An unlucky leaderboard should be based on luck or 'unluck' :) otherwise its the 'skilful percentage manipulation' leaderboard.

I give you the right to determine the number of spins and that applies from this week and moving forward !
 
CMRTPSPINSNotes
mariafbb
8.00%​
5​
DNQ
nikantw
29.46%​
118​
£50​
colinsunderland
48.50%​
423​
£25​
ESCJAMIE
49.01%​
184​
£10​
geordiecolin
60.43%​
278​
curremon
70.02%​
550​
danofthewibble
70.03%​
155​
Scott1baird
70.29%​
231​
£25​
bamberfishcake
74.15%​
1163​
Supababe
78.75%​
551​
luckyscouser45
79.08%​
3365​
Kroffe
87.44%​
1830​
johnnymcc1966
91.63%​
618​
helenakp
96.92%​
1705​
Nate
107.17%​
9342​
irish-ranger
109.28%​
7973​

Happy birthday @Scott1baird there is your gift :)
 
I give you the right to determine the number of spins and that applies from this week and moving forward !

I am honoured :)

I was kind of agreeing with some previous posts. I think reading the posts that followed it seemed everybody had settled on sticking with what we had.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

Tell you what, ill use the power vested in me by @L&L-Jan to say this:

If anybody thinks the rules should be tweaked please say now or forever hold your peace!

If so, then we can put any suggestions to some kind of easy vote.
 
I am honoured :)

I was kind of agreeing with some previous posts. I think reading the posts that followed it seemed everybody had settled on sticking with what we had.

Please correct me if i am wrong.

Tell you what, ill use the power vested in me by @L&L-Jan to say this:

If anybody thinks the rules should be tweaked please say now or forever hold your peace!

If so, then we can put any suggestions to some kind of easy vote.

I like my suggestion (heh) that depending on spincount, you are able to win different prizes.

100-200 spins, you are only competing for 3rd prize.
201-500 you are competing for 3rd&2nd prize
501+ you are competing for all prizes.

Same with monthly, to be able to win first prize a total of 2000 spins would be needed, total of 800 for 2nd, 400 for 3rd.

Makes it so that everybody can take part, but also rewards loyalty.
Maybe add a min stake of 10-20p.
 
Keep it the same or have it 200 spins per week, and 800 per month but you need to take part in all 4 weeks to qualify for the monthly.



Or keep the same amount of spin but increase from 10p per spin to 20.

I think having multiple levels of prizes As mentioned before would just complicate the comp too much with having 3 leaderboard per week and how would it work for the monthly.


Regardless I wish everyone good luck.
 
Last edited:
Keep it the same or have it 200 spins per week, and 800 per month but you need to take part in all 4 weeks to qualify for the monthly.



Or keep the same amount of spin but increase from 10p per spin to 20.

I think having multiple levels of prizes As mentioned before would just complicate the comp too much with having 3 leaderboard per week and how would it work for the monthly.


Regardless I wish everyone good luck.

Its still only one leaderboard, the only thing changing is that the prizes people are able to win change depending on how many spins they have made.
And monthly would work just like i described above.
No need to participate all weeks, but a total of 400-800-2000 spins for the month is needed to be able to win any prizes in the monthly.

Example:

CMRTPSPINSNotes
mariafbb8.00%5DNQ
nikantw29.46%1183rd prize
colinsunderland48.50%4232nd prize
ESCJAMIE49.01%184
geordiecolin60.43%278
curremon70.02%550first prize
danofthewibble70.03%155
Scott1baird70.29%231£25
bamberfishcake74.15%1163
Supababe78.75%551
luckyscouser4579.08%3365
Kroffe87.44%1830
johnnymcc196691.63%618
helenakp96.92%1705
Nate107.17%9342
irish-ranger109.28%7973

See, easy peasy!
 
Its still only one leaderboard, the only thing changing is that the prizes people are able to win change depending on how many spins they have made.
And monthly would work just like i described above.
No need to participate all weeks, but a total of 400-800-2000 spins for the month is needed to be able to win any prizes in the monthly.

Example:

CMRTPSPINSNotes
mariafbb8.00%5DNQ
nikantw29.46%1183rd prize
colinsunderland48.50%4232nd prize
ESCJAMIE49.01%184
geordiecolin60.43%278
curremon70.02%550first prize
danofthewibble70.03%155
Scott1baird70.29%231£25
bamberfishcake74.15%1163
Supababe78.75%551
luckyscouser4579.08%3365
Kroffe87.44%1830
johnnymcc196691.63%618
helenakp96.92%1705
Nate107.17%9342
irish-ranger109.28%7973

See, easy peasy!

Can't see nikan Colin and escjamie being overly joyed with the result there. Nor Supababe who had 1 more spin than the first place guy.
As I said either keep it the same or basily double the minimums.
 
Its still only one leaderboard, the only thing changing is that the prizes people are able to win change depending on how many spins they have made.
And monthly would work just like i described above.
No need to participate all weeks, but a total of 400-800-2000 spins for the month is needed to be able to win any prizes in the monthly.

Example:

CMRTPSPINSNotes
mariafbb8.00%5DNQ
nikantw29.46%1183rd prize
colinsunderland48.50%4232nd prize
ESCJAMIE49.01%184
geordiecolin60.43%278
curremon70.02%550first prize
danofthewibble70.03%155
Scott1baird70.29%231£25
bamberfishcake74.15%1163
Supababe78.75%551
luckyscouser4579.08%3365
Kroffe87.44%1830
johnnymcc196691.63%618
helenakp96.92%1705
Nate107.17%9342
irish-ranger109.28%7973

See, easy peasy!

I see what you mean but the idea is to keep it as simple as possible. :)
Remember, all spins of all sizes are added for the RTP but only the spins 0.10 and above can qualify you. You see how you make it over complicated for Jan right?
 
Can't see nikan Colin and escjamie being overly joyed with the result there. Nor Supababe who had 1 more spin than the first place guy.
As I said either keep it the same or basily double the minimums.

You think curremon making 1 more spin would have changed the outcome?
Not impossible i guess, but most likely his rtp would not have jumped over 8% with another spin.
Even tho their spincounts are close, 8% difference in rtp is quite big over 550 spins.
 
I see what you mean but the idea is to keep it as simple as possible. :)
Remember, all spins of all sizes are added for the RTP but only the spins 0.10 and above can qualify you. You see how you make it over complicated for Jan right?

I dont think its over complicated.
But in the end its up to jan to decide if any changes are made.

As a sidenote tho, i see the people winning most now are the same people most hesistant to put in new rules. :P
 
I dont think its over complicated.
But in the end its up to jan to decide if any changes are made.

As a sidenote tho, i see the people winning most now are the same people most hesistant to put in new rules. :p
I have offered new rules a few times if you look back through the pages. Nikan has made some aswell. But the whole point in this comp is rtp and not spin count.
 
I mean what would you do if you had done 499 spins with a really crappy rtp then suddenly hit a jackpot spin of say 10000x I'm sure you wouldn't keep spinning just to lower your RTP. Same also applies if you spin 500 times with a really crappy rtp your unlikely to redeposit and chase your loses.

I have won two weekly and one monthly, and made suggestions on amount of spins that would probably go against me personally but as I said before it's a game. If the rules are changed then so be it. It won't change the way I play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top