Casino2014man
Non-Gambler
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2014
- Location
- United Kingdom
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
I have to say.. I am surprised this got as far as the courts.. Clearly an error
Interesting Slot Case in the News
- Thread starter Casino2014man
- Start date
I have to say.. I am surprised this got as far as the courts.. Clearly an error
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2004
- Location
- United Kingdom
As well as "trying it on", the problem may well be one of trust. Is it an error, or a dishonest casino trying to wriggle out of paying out in the interests of profit.
We see many instances of casinos "trying it on" with dodgy terms and conditions, "spirit of the bonus", etc so they shouldn't be surprised when players don't believe them when they claim "honest mistake" before denying a large payout.
In cases like this, the first the player hears about it being a known glitch is when the casino uses it as an excuse for non payment, even though the industry and game supplier have known about it for a while. If casinos were more open about the possibility of display glitches, making it clear to players on a notice that the max is, say, $10,000 and that a multi million display is a glitch BEFORE any player actually experienced it, then they may find that such players will accept the published max, say $10,000, rather than press for the full displayed amount in a case that the casino will most likely win, but will generate far more than $10,000 of bad publicity.
In this particular case, the casino failed to follow the recommendation of the game supplier intended to deal with the possibility of this glitch manifesting itself.
We see many instances of casinos "trying it on" with dodgy terms and conditions, "spirit of the bonus", etc so they shouldn't be surprised when players don't believe them when they claim "honest mistake" before denying a large payout.
In cases like this, the first the player hears about it being a known glitch is when the casino uses it as an excuse for non payment, even though the industry and game supplier have known about it for a while. If casinos were more open about the possibility of display glitches, making it clear to players on a notice that the max is, say, $10,000 and that a multi million display is a glitch BEFORE any player actually experienced it, then they may find that such players will accept the published max, say $10,000, rather than press for the full displayed amount in a case that the casino will most likely win, but will generate far more than $10,000 of bad publicity.
In this particular case, the casino failed to follow the recommendation of the game supplier intended to deal with the possibility of this glitch manifesting itself.
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2015
- Location
- Bergen
Yeah, it is stated in the article that the max payout were set to $10,000, but it is still pretty sad having seen that big jackpot come up and not getting anything from it. $10,000 feels like a slap in the face compared to the $40''+ 
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Location
- Wolverhampton
Pity I couldn't make a claim against all the 'glitches' I suffer daily, IE countless laggy, losing spins 
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2010
- Location
- Mostly the Netherlands
Can i say it? "Only in America" 
No offense of course but it's obvious that getting into court with anything really, is much more likely to happen over there
I don't blame the Granny for trying though..
No offense of course but it's obvious that getting into court with anything really, is much more likely to happen over there
I don't blame the Granny for trying though..
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Location
- Earth.
41mil... or nadddda
that woulda hurt...
that woulda hurt...
Similar threads
