Azzurri
Banned User
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2014
- Location
- From Foil Land
I think the debate is a healthy one regardless of what side of the fence you're on. I don't think it's necessary for some meisters to sarcastically tease other posters, as everyone is entitled to an opinion, or to share their thoughts and experiences. That is the general idea behind forums.
I think we would all like to think no funny business, or corruption is involved when it comes to the software. However, just as it may seem naive to some, that players become suspicious, perhaps it is just as naive to believe it is all entirely above board, because those who provide the software, and distribute it, tell us it is.
The change I've noticed with MG, has nothing to do with being on a losing streak, as I have continued to win and hit features, however the size of the wins have drastically reduced, when compared to the same hits, and bet sizes, as approximately 4-6 months ago. My playing habits haven't changed, hence I made comments regarding my experiences, whether crazy sounding or not.
If the comment made by someone within this thread, regarding MG funding ecogra, is true, then surely that's a huge conflict of interest. It sounds too crazy to be true, as surely it's not a great message to be sending the end client. I'm not saying anything untoward is occurring, but if true, surely every player has a slight concern that the provider themselves have created and funded the very organisation who's job it is to police and enforce fair play from that provider. Very confusing.
I think we would all like to think no funny business, or corruption is involved when it comes to the software. However, just as it may seem naive to some, that players become suspicious, perhaps it is just as naive to believe it is all entirely above board, because those who provide the software, and distribute it, tell us it is.
The change I've noticed with MG, has nothing to do with being on a losing streak, as I have continued to win and hit features, however the size of the wins have drastically reduced, when compared to the same hits, and bet sizes, as approximately 4-6 months ago. My playing habits haven't changed, hence I made comments regarding my experiences, whether crazy sounding or not.
If the comment made by someone within this thread, regarding MG funding ecogra, is true, then surely that's a huge conflict of interest. It sounds too crazy to be true, as surely it's not a great message to be sending the end client. I'm not saying anything untoward is occurring, but if true, surely every player has a slight concern that the provider themselves have created and funded the very organisation who's job it is to police and enforce fair play from that provider. Very confusing.