If OP will file PAB- then this case will be taken under the tables. I see no ANY reason why
this specific case cannot be discussed in open. I don't understand why OP should follow the strict bureaucratic procedures of the PAb?
The guy had a conflict , he came to this forum
and told to the wide gambling community his story. And there was also a POLL
conducted at this forum which confirmed that the vast majority of the
forum users think that 32red casino must pay the guy what he won and pay it
in full. What else should we discuss here?
I call to 32red representatives here: you see the opinion of the Casinomeister
gambling community. And , as I see it, you have 3 options:
1) To ignore that opinion
2) To take the opinion into consideration and pay the OP in full
3) In case you have any additional and important details about this case- present it to the forum.
At this point it is clear that 32red chooses the option number 1 and simply ignores Casinomeister
community.
this specific case cannot be discussed in open. I don't understand why OP should follow the strict bureaucratic procedures of the PAb?
The guy had a conflict , he came to this forum
and told to the wide gambling community his story. And there was also a POLL
conducted at this forum which confirmed that the vast majority of the
forum users think that 32red casino must pay the guy what he won and pay it
in full. What else should we discuss here?
I call to 32red representatives here: you see the opinion of the Casinomeister
gambling community. And , as I see it, you have 3 options:
1) To ignore that opinion
2) To take the opinion into consideration and pay the OP in full
3) In case you have any additional and important details about this case- present it to the forum.
At this point it is clear that 32red chooses the option number 1 and simply ignores Casinomeister
community.