I have to agree on some postings here, and i'm sure you'll find the same simular "red line" about the way N1 deals with it's paying customers. It's no secret that some casino's do hate players that win. Do hate paying out. Because paying out is on the balances a less overall profit. I've dealth with scammers in my profession and they had a simular tactic. Just take the money and provide no service. They would top it off with a excuse the client would be baffled about and that was it. No way they could perform any legal action(s) over such a low amount of funds.
Don't forget, that casino is in curacao and to even take it legal your looking at a lawyer, a translator and civil court costs, which can easily raise to 15k and you don't even have a case yet. Because of that, this jurisdictional invincibility, they kind of can get away "here and there" by picking on random players who don't have a clue on what's going on, what their rights are or just threat 'm as frigging gambling addicts.
If you spawn up N1 casino review you'll 100% find simular reviews, not just the ones here. Ive bin in there myself and i cannot say i left that place with a happy ending. It is also due to one of the affiliate partners of N1 who kind of wrote an email right out of nowhere claiming to stop the program, while hundreds of euro's due to affiliate revenue, is left unpaid. I mean that's the type of business your dealing with. There's nothing you can do about it.
When i got into the N1 thing years ago, i quickly learned that quite some reviews are too positive for the place it really is. It does'nt suprise me a marketing agency has performed the various reviews all over the board or place on the internet. You can tell by the simple stuff like "Great for german players" (While germany is considered a A+ country) or any of the other, obvious clues. The overal RTP in my experience, esp when your playing on a sub-casino site that shares the same license, might be advertised 96.5% but the reality is quite lower.
Ive played on a curacao casino before; that would not have RTP per game, but RTP overall on the place. Basicly all deposits are distributed among all players, with a 96.5% and they simply license the games. Still legal ofcourse.
Any casino from Curacao should be avoided, in my opinion. The problem is in such countries corruption and money do go hand by hand. Please prove me otherwise. I'm sure N1 started to feel financially the "damage" they where causing and the rising bad reviews, so surely something had to happen. If that brand wants to continue to be a recommended place to play at, i'd suggest stopping to screw it's players. Stop the ridiculous SOW / KYC procedure's, it's not like it's a high-end license or anything. It's used as an excuse to avoid paying out. If players play, win, they should be paid. It's simple as that.
I'd feel like writing half of the internet now with, hey guys, Casinomeister is requesting PAB's to be opened if you ever had issues with N1. Perhaps this could give some insights to Casinomeister itself that most story's on the internet are'nt fabricated or sucked out of a left thumb, but reflect reality of what's going on. And that that listing on this website with recommended casino's might be looked at with a magnifying glass.
This is what i like about this forum. You are able to express yourself freely (with respect) and there's no ban hammering on voicing your opinion. Remember that.
And no asking how much a player earns on a yearly basis has nothing todo with KYC - but obvious marketing attempts. Who are the richest players and who we can suck into the VIP program? A normal KYC is a simple proof of identity, proof of adress, and a proof of transaction (i.e Bank or Credit Card). Thats all the information a casino should know and nothing more.
