BODOG TO APPEAL NEVADA PATENT RULING IN OCTOBER
28 September 2007
But 1st Technologies have hired some serious legal
firepower
There could be fireworks in Nevada on October 11 when
Bodog, presumably in the form of its new Morris Mohawk
brand licensee, confronts 1st Technologies in the first
face-to-face clash of a $48 million patent dispute that
has thus far cost Bodog its brands (see previous
InfoPowa reports)
According to Bodog boss Calvin Ayre's blog, the two
sides will argue the validity of the default judgment
handed down to the gaming company by Nevada judiciary
and a judge in the Superior Court of King's County in
Seattle, Washington.
1st Technology claims the $48 million default judgment
is fair and good because Bodog (which was not present to
contest the claim) infringed its United States Patent
No. 5,564,001 entitled "Method and System for
Interactively Transmitting Multimedia Information Over a
Network which Requires a Reduced Bandwidth" while
operating in the United States.
Giving a hint at the defence strategy, Ayre writes that
Bodog Entertainment SA as a Costa Rican company is an
international entity that has neither a presence or
assets in the United States. He adds that it is not part
of the Bodog Group of Companies and has no assets, and
that domains are not assets and the domains it held were
on behalf of other unspecified companies.
Domain names are a part of the world community based on
ICANN's charter and mission statement, which brings into
question whether or not they could or should be seized.
Bodog's main defence, though seems to rest on its
contention that it was not properly served on the Nevada
patent action, thus destroying the allegation that it
was in default at the hearing.
Ayre writes: "Nobody involved with the company that was
sued or anyone with BodogLife [a new brand recently
launched as a consequence of the patent dispute] has any
knowledge of anyone getting served and this is the basis
of the appeal of the judgment on Oct 11th. You cannot
have a valid default judgment without having valid
service as far as we know."
Describing the court's decision as "ridiculous" Ayre
goes on to opine that it will be overturned and the
domains reinstated as Bodog's. However, the new
BodogLife brand will continue to be the group's
prominent brand going forward.
Patents issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
grew to 165 485 last year from 96 727 in 1990.
Patent-infringement lawsuits, meanwhile, doubled to 2
400 from 1988 to 2001, according to the National Academy
of Sciences.
Bodog's lawyers will face a formidable adversary in
court, it appears. 1st Technologies is represented by
one of the most successful patent action law firms in
the United States - the 26-lawyer Chicago firm of Niro,
Scavone, Haller &. Niro, devoted exclusively to
plaintiff intellectual property actions, often on a
contingency basis where the company gets 45 percent of
proceeds from a license, jury verdict or settlement.
The head of the firm, Raymond Niro has won dozens of
patent-related jury verdicts worth more than $400
million, according to Law.com. Among his truimphs Niro
won one of Colorado's biggest patent-infringement cases
in 1997 when a Denver jury awarded inventor Ron Chasteen
$57 million from snowmobile maker Polaris Industries and
its engine supplier, Fuji Heavy Industries. An appeals
court boosted the award to roughly $95 million.
Other major cases include the Research in Motion action,
where the Canadian maker of BlackBerry hand-held e-mail
devices, settled with NTP Inc. of Virginia on March 3
this year for $612.5 million. RIM refused to pay
royalties to NTP for its wireless e-mail technology but
lost at trial and faced a potential shutdown.
Another was the miniscule patent holder Freedom
Wireless, which won a $148.1 million award from Boston
Communications Group and four other companies last year
in an infringement case over a patent for prepaid
cellphone systems, whilst in a dispute between
Denver-based Qwest and Texas company PhoneTel, more than
a dozen technology and telecommunications companies
settled on caller-ID technology developed by deceased
Japanese inventor Kazuo Hashimoto. All settlements
exceeded $65 million.
Law.com succinctly observes: "Raymond Niro sues first,
settles fast, and collects millions..."
Online Casino News courtesy of
InfoPowa
More news here.
Top of page |
Home |
News |
Forum |
Webcast |
Vortran |
Accredited Casinos |
Evil Ones |
Pitch a Bitch |
Partner Links |
Poker
|