But it remains sufficient for the persecution of online gambling executives, a spokesperson says.
A Department of Justice spokesperson this week probably showed why some US legislators are so anxious to introduce new laws banning Internet gambling - the 1961 Wire Act is "dated."
Referring to the laws under which it prosecutes, including the controversial 1961 Act, Justice Department spokeswoman Jacqueline Lesch claimed to OUT-LAW, a radio medium of the Pinsent Masons law firm: "They [the laws] include language about a wire communication facility which we believe includes the internet. They are dated but they cover online gambling."
The latest edition of OUT-LAW Radio looks into the confused legal status of online gambling in the US.
"It is certainly very confused because they [the authorities] are relying on statutes that date back to the 1960s and you have the added complication of individual states interpreting them in different ways," said John Hagan, a lawyer at gambling law specialist firm Harris Hagan.
"Certainly I'm confused and no doubt the online gambling operators are equally confused and when you're talking about the risk of criminal penalties and being arrested in transit through the States it's not a very satisfactory state of affairs."
"We don't think it is confusing," the Justice Department's Lesch said. "We think it contravenes three statutes, the Wire Act, the Travel Act and the Illegal Gambling Businesses Act. This has long been a concern of the DoJ."
Many legal observers question the use of the 1961 Act to prosecute individuals for using technology and services that were not invented when the Act was written. "They are certainly taking a very strong view of outdated legislation and applying an interpretation for their own purposes," said Hagan.
A new law which would outlaw all internet gambling has passed through the House of Representatives in the US but has not yet passed through a Senate presoccupied with law that have a higher priority. Attempts are currently being made to achieve passage of the proposal by attaching it to totally unrelated Defence Department legislation.
Most observers believe that it will not be passed. "The chances of it actually passing through the Senate are quite low," said Wayne Brown, an analyst at Altium Securities who follows online gambling firms. "The same bill has in various other forms failed to pass over the last few years."
The DoJ spokeswoman said that it intended to continue prosecuting under existing laws. "When the evidence allows, we will continue," she said.
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.
Copyright 1998-2017. All rights reserved. Casinomeister is a registered trademark ®.