KENTUCKY EXPECTATIONS (Update)
10 October 2008
A bigger courtroom may be required...
Next Tuesday's resumption of debate on the legality of
the attempt by the state of Kentucky to seize control of
141 international online gambling domains (see previous
InfoPowa reports) continues to generate significant
interest both within and outside of the industry.
Judge Thomas Wingate of the Franklin Circuit Court, who
had earlier signed off on a temporary seizure of domains
through registrars at the behest of outsourced lawyers
working for the state, faced a platoon of legal
representatives from online gambling companies, trade
associations and public interest groups supporting
freedom of speech and the Internet at the initial
hearing last week.
Lawyers for both sides argued legal technicalities
centred on the legal standing and identification of
domain owners and claims that the action against 141
domain names took place “under cover” and with no notice
to their clients. They sought a continuation to brief
Judge Wingate on matters of law which they contended
will demonstrate the court has no jurisdiction and
should dismiss the action.
Judge Wingate gave all involved until October 7 to
submit detailed legal briefs on their positions and
qualifications for legal standing. The judge pointed out
that the case was a complex matter in law where
decisions reached could set precedents and have far
reaching consequences outside the online gambling
industry . It was therefore appropriate that those with
the right to be heard submitted their arguments for
debate and examination.
However, the judge sounded an ominous note when he told
lawyers representing the domain names at issue: “You are
going to have to eventually pony up and say who these
people are.”
In the meantime the judge's temporary seizure of the
domains remains in place.
The October 7 hearing looks likely to be even more
crowded as opponents to the Kentucky state's action,
which officials have admitted is aimed at forcing
operators to bar Kentucky online gamblers and pay
unspecified compensation to state coffers, present their
arguments in a case that is already attracting wide
mainstream publicity.
The state's lawyers, employed on a contingency "no win
no pay" deal, have claimed that online gambling falls
within existing legislation which prohibits 'gambling
devices' because domain names can be classified as such
devices, a point that will no doubt be hotly contested.
Online gambling is not specifically declared illegal in
Kentucky, where Governor Steve Beshear has proved to be
a staunch supporter of land-based casino and horseracing
activity.
Among those who will have legal representatives present
are the Internet Gaming Counsel, The Poker Players
Alliance, iMEGA, the Internet Commerce Association and
the Americans for Tax Reform, and it is understood that
an open press conference is planned for the day before
the October 7 hearing where a diverse range of
representative bodies will make relevant statements.
The executive director of the Poker Players Alliance,
John Pappas is driving the press conference and urges
all interested parties to discuss participation with him
by using the PPA website.
Online Casino News courtesy of
InfoPowa
More news here.
Top of page |
Home |
News |
Forum |
Webcast |
Vortran |
Accredited Casinos |
Evil Ones |
Pitch a Bitch |
Partner Links |
Poker
|