QUESTIONS RAISED ON POKER BAD BEAT JACKPOTS
8 May 2009
Poker players sue L.A.-area casinos over
jackpots for losers
The Los Angeles Times has reported on a legal case
involving land casinos which could have implications for
online poker operators offering the Badbeat style of
jackpot.
The article records a legal suit that
claims players were denied a chance to compete for 'bad
beat' payouts, for those who lose despite holding strong
hands, unless they played at tables where the house
collects $1 per pot. Similar practices are caried out
ata number of online poker ooms offering the jackpots.
According to the LA Times piece, five Los Angeles
County card rooms could lose millions if two
recreational poker players win a lawsuit challenging the
popular Badbeat jackpot promotion.
Apparently
California state officials have warned casinos that the
jackpots - in which players can win thousands of dollars
for losing - are classed as illegal lotteries.
Card rooms typically collect $1 from every pot, amassing
thousands of dollars a day, and use the money to reward
players who lose despite holding exceptionally strong
hands. These tough-luck gamblers qualify for the
casinos' "bad-beat jackpots" - consolation prizes that
often far exceed the amount of money scooped up by the
winning players.
The LA Times references a 2005
advisory, where then-Attorney General Bill Lockyer
cautioned casinos that the promotions violated state law
unless players were allowed to win the jackpots without
paying the table fee. It's the same legal principle that
requires McDonald's to give away game pieces for its
popular Monopoly game to consumers who ask for them,
regardless of whether they buy anything.
Recreational poker players Dennis Chae and Jeff Kim
contend in the lawsuit that the Bicycle Club, Commerce,
Hustler, Hollywood Park and Hawaiian Gardens casinos
would not allow them to compete for the jackpots unless
they played at tables that collected the $1-per-pot
fees, even though casino adverts said no purchase was
required.
Their lawsuit, filed May 1 in Los
Angeles County Superior Court, seeks class-action status
and alleges that tens of thousands of players could
become plaintiffs. It accuses the casinos of false
advertising and unfair competition and seeks monetary
damages and an injunction ending the jackpots.
Haig Kelegian, managing general partner of the Bicycle
Casino in Bell Gardens, described the lawsuit as a stunt
that had little chance of succeeding. If players at his
casino ask, and very few do, they can play at tables
that don't collect the $1 fees, he said.
"They're just doing this to try to figure out a way to
sue somebody," Kelegian said. "We have always had no
purchase necessary."
Andy Schneiderman, vice
president and general counsel for the Commerce Casino,
said in a statement that the casino's bad-beat promotion
"complies with all legal requirements."
The poker
players' lawyers estimate that the five casinos collect
millions annually for the jackpots. They charge
"administrative fees" of 15 percent to 25 percent before
funding the jackpot pools, collecting hundreds of
thousands of dollars in profit, the lawyers said.
"The casinos obviously have tremendous incentive,"
said Tym S. MacLeod, one of the plaintiffs' lawyers.
"This is not a case about collecting gambling losses
back; this is a case about putting a stop to the
deceptive advertising."
Online Casino News Courtesy of
Infopowa
More news here.
Top of page |
Home |
News |
Forum |
Webcast |
Vortran |
Accredited Casinos |
Evil Ones |
Pitch a Bitch |
Online Gambling Resources |
Poker
|