SNOW FALL (OUT)
15 January 2010
Ladbrokes at centre of a GBP 7 million row on
weather bets
InfoPowa readers will recall last week's interesting
backgrounder on betting on snow in London, and the
definition of a snowfall in this regard. This week the
subject of betting on whether snow would fall more
widely in Britain was in the headlines, but it was
unfortunately in a negative sense as a row over a
disputed bet.
At the centre of the furore was the
major UK online and land gambling group Ladbrokes, which
according to a wide range of UK media is refusing to pay
out more than GBP 7 million to a man who gambled on a
white Christmas.
The contentious part is that
Ladbrokes claims it is justified in refusing to pay out
because the bet was accepted by mistake.
Gambling
man Cliff Bryant (52) had placed two GBP 5 accumulator
bets that snow would fall on 24 towns and cities across
the north of England on Christmas Day. And, as anyone
watching UK news now knows, his prediction was
fulfilled.
“We have apologised to the customer
for any confusion and for mistakenly accepting an
accumulator bet when our own rules state that only
single bets are available on a market of this nature,”
said a Ladbrokes spokesman. “We are happy to void the
bets and to pay the customer his winnings on the
relevant singles.”
That is hardly likely to
appease the punter, because it is worth a mere GBP
31.78, rather than the GBP 7.1 million Bryant was
expecting .
The graphic designer from
Southampton, who told the local Southern Daily Echo
newspaper that he would seek legal advice, claims the
first accumulator would have won him GBP 4.9 million,
with the second adding GBP 2.2 million.
“If I
make a mistake in my work like that it costs me dearly
and I think the offer should be a lot more generous than
they have made,” he told the paper, clearly prepared to
agree to a settlement at the right sort of offer.
Ladbrokes should have made their rules clearer, he
added. “They are one of the leading bookmakers in the
country and I think they ought to do their homework a
bit better in future.”
Ladbrokes gave Bryant
details of the Independent Betting Adjudication Service,
an impartial adjudicator on disputes that arise between
gambling operators and their customers, but in the
meantime the publicity coverage on the dispute has been
wide and not entirely positive.
Online Casino News Courtesy of
Infopowa
More news here.
Top of page |
Home |
News |
Forum |
Webcast |
Vortran |
Accredited Casinos |
Evil Ones |
Pitch a Bitch |
Online Gambling Resources |
Poker
|