When he mentioned about other games being excluded along with Wishmaster.
Those games are: Devil's Delight, Champion of the Track and Robin Hood.
They all work in similar way, you are collecting bonus symbols. like souls in Devil's Delight, and then you play bonus round.
Bonus hunters are collecting symbols with bonus funds, and then they return to play bonus round with real cash.
I guess it must be the same with Wishmaster and wishes.
Rather silly slot design then.
Surely the designers knew full well that giving bonuses is the mainstay of the online casino industry, yet they failed to take this into account when designing the games.
The good thing is that they did manage to implement software based enforcement that blocks access to the banned games, so no player should be capable of breaking this term.
However, are they sure they have not simply moved the problem, rather than having solved it?
It's the zeroing out of WR when the player busts out that has made this AP method (and others) a problem. If WR routinely carried over, many of the AP methods would be worthless, and as such it would be possible to reduce the current dizzyingly high WR requirements back to levels not seen in a decade or more.
The clever and crafty players are simply going to look for the next method of gaining an advantage, and this will be the case for as long as casinos rely so much on bonuses. All they are REALLY doing is trying to win over the long term, the same thing that the operators are trying to do. The clever players look for the best ways to play the games and offers, whilst the operators look for the best ways to market their wares and entice players into parting with their money. SPAM is one thing that is the operator equivalent of "playing the game with ill intent", misleading advertising of an offer to make it appear much better than it is another "ill intent" in the marketing game.
Since it is almost unheard of to receive
32Red spam, the operators who do seem to get involved with spam are doing less than they are capable of in order to address the problem, hence the "ill intent" of turning a blind eye in order to gain the advantage that a small percentage of conversions IS from responses to spam, which they would lose were they to adopt a strict "zero tolerance" approach.