This is pretty much ON TOPIC. It demonstrates that casinos can GET IT WRONG sometimes, and will NEVER admit their mistake, nor explain it. This means there is no learning process, and on top of this players feel the reasoning is bogus, and the problems are down to other factors, such as "winning too much". It is dreadful that an EXISTING player of some TWO YEARS just NEVER EARNS THE TRUST from the CASINO, yet CASINOS expect that players will trust THEM at their word, and are offended when some players seem NEVER to trust casinos, no matter how good they are.
In your case, surely the OTHER account is more likely to be the "bogus" one, that should be ineligible for the promotion. Where casinos detect a link to a more recently created account, it should be THAT account that gets investigated, and blocked from bonuses, NOT the account owned by a loyal player of two years.
I have personal experience of how Ladbrokes constantly "screw up" with their customer service, and their ATTITUDE that they cannot possibly have made a mistake at THEIR end. I awarded them a 6 month suspension from my PC for their trouble, even though they DID settle in the end, and I got my bonus.
The OPs case though, is different. He is a new player at the casino, and is supposedly linked to other new players, who are alleged to have used collusion to make the bonus +EV, working as a professional syndicate.
Your experience shows that casinos can detect "connections" that are nothing more than interpretations of co-incidences, a bit like making forecasts from past patterns in random slots.
The
OP should now realise that making a
PAB is well worth it, as Max may well see this as nothing more than a wrong conclusion drawn from a set of unfortunate co-incidences.
Many fraudulent players though, join here and post a complaint, but never follow through. This leads to the suspicion that the complaint has no merit, and is more an attempt to "blackmail" the casino into paying up for fear of bad publicity, than an attempt to right a wrong. The sheer number of fraudulent players posting as "one hit wonders" in the complaint sections to "blackmail" a casino into paying up is what has lead to the imposition of restrictions on new members, which has barred them from posting in this section.
It is essential that the
OP return and
PAB, otherwise he will not only get mistaken by Spin Palace as being a member of this syndicate, but will get mistaken as a fraudulent/blackmailing player here. This in turn will STRENGTHEN the case of Spin Palace that he is a member of some syndicate of "professional players/fraudsters".
Bookmarks