Dirk Diggler
Dormant account
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2004
- Location
- UK
To be fair I don't see what that's got to do with this situation. That boiled down to cirrus claiming they had informed the player via live chat that he wasn't liable for certain promotions where as the player claimed to have no recollection of the chat.
This seems to be a fairly straight forward case of the casino claiming 'bonus abuse' and confiscating the players winnings when they didn't like the way they played, even though the terms and conditions had been followed.
I'd be very interested to see if they respond, and be very surprised if that turned out not to be the case.
This seems to be a fairly straight forward case of the casino claiming 'bonus abuse' and confiscating the players winnings when they didn't like the way they played, even though the terms and conditions had been followed.
I'd be very interested to see if they respond, and be very surprised if that turned out not to be the case.