AussieDave
Banned User
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2005
- Location
- Australia
Funny - they even have a "protected by" copyscape logo on the site. It should be entitled, "Copyscrape"
Funny - they even have a "protected by" copyscape logo on the site. It should be entitled, "Copyscrape"
Dom take a look at the site in question.
You'll see the configuration is set up (in my opinion) to cloak content...
However, google is the one and only one to really decide what is and is not 'cloaking',
Could you tell me what interesting did you find in my source code? All source code was programmed by me, and I don't see any strange things there. I use php, mysql database, css. Is it not allowed?Dom just try to look at the source code on the site and you'll see what I mean.
Dom just try to look at the source code on the site and you'll see what I mean.
Ok, so one can't see the source code. But that can be a protection against content theft?
No, I can't see it. Using IE7. I think it may be part of the copyscape protection?
Ok, so one can't see the source code. But that can be a protection against content theft?
You said that I was a link spammer, you said that I used blackhat SEO, you said that I had a spam network, you said that I was a Russian front of spammers affiliated with 888.com and moreover you said that I promoted them exclusively (I have never promoted them exclusively!!!)- nothing was proved by real facts. And now you say that I use cloaking techniques, how can I use them if I even know nothing about such techniques.
Ok, today I've read2. I said you are a link spammer. But I also said that it is not up to me to decide if you are or not. It is up to google to decide if you are a link spammer or not.
I would refer you to the section on Link Spam here
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
or here
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Of course, I see my pages, but what is strange there?Then take a look at your site in Yahoo site explorer... what do you see?
...Concerning links, her website has less than 1.200...not big numbers for a link spammer and after checking some of hem I couldn't find anything I wouldn't do myself (I have some corpses around me but who doesn't in terms of SEO when you know that you can't control who links to you).
Finally I don't see any clear accusation against Aksana, just questioning but maybe I've missed something ?
I've checked theYou do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.and I didn't find anything suspicious or different of what I can see now.
If you so smart why didn't check my source code in different browsers, or even why didn't try to view my source code using the Menu in IE? if "right click" does not work than I use cloaking scripts, what rubbish!Since all the attention to this site, it appears that the cloaking script was removed yesterday and replaced by a right click denial meta tag.
I'm a a professional SEO and cloaking was my hobby in my early days.
Server side cloaking is accessible from Google cache because it's a copy of what Google sees.
That's why cloakers use the no cache option to avoid people (but not Google) spotting them by comparing the source code and te copy cached by Google.
Spammers are very easy to spot on the Internet because here everything is recorded, whatever you do leaves a footprint, you can't hide anything because of the same nature of Internet.
Aksana has clearly done a bad thing copying the Meister's list without giving credit, but we can't prosecute her for other things without proofs and with improper investigation.
That is my main message.
Just wanted to add that I don't know Aksana, never seen or heard of her before.
Spear, I though you were going to close this thread?