- Joined
- Jan 9, 2013
- Location
- Kent
Shitburst, like Gonzo, and probably bonanza too, may as well just write "trust me bro" on their game information page.
Disgusting!
Disgusting!
I see the phrase "few hundred thousand spins" and I think back to the Starburst challenge... never did see that full screen in the end?
The follow-on video I made for Crazy Time, looking at how betting strategies can affect RTP (choosing the highest RTP segments isn't the no-brainer it might sound like), and how the Pachinko bonus round in particular can be 'engineered' to be low or high paying.
For some reason this video did well on the old channel, getting many thousands of views, I'm still not sure why.
Probably because there is a cult/loyal following for these games, with their extremely entertaining hosts.
Whenever Ladbrokes give me a gameshow bonus with a 1x turnover, I blow it all in one go to save what's left of my sanity
The follow-on video I made for Crazy Time, looking at how betting strategies can affect RTP (choosing the highest RTP segments isn't the no-brainer it might sound like), and how the Pachinko bonus round in particular can be 'engineered' to be low or high paying.
For some reason this video did well on the old channel, getting many thousands of views, I'm still not sure why.
There is no strategy on random 96-98% games. At best you can mitigate the variance.
It's curious to see how this has played out in the couple of years since the video was originally published. With people so obsessed by ultra-high variance slots, live casino providers seem to be pushing the "potential" (man, I hate that word now) angle to the limit... games that talk about mammoth pays that clearly are incapable of doing so in any reasonable timeframe.If you watch these games for any amount of time (you can log in and watch the game in real money mode without placing any bets, I sometimes have one of them running off to the side whilst I'm playing a videogame), what you realise is they're incredibly low volatility and flat in the main, even what we'd consider 'medium pays' in slots terms are rare, and high pays are very rare.
lol...just had a @ChopleyIOM session (y'know when he got 4 features in 139 spins?) not quite that dramatic but 6 in about 850 spins.The +EV strategy for bonanza is to get Dazzas log in details.
That’s the clue.
11 years ago, and how true that prediction was...It's very very easy to put together video after video of win after win after win, that's not honest, that's not accurate
SHITBURST AHOY! This was originally uploaded, in four different parts, in late 2012 on an old YouTube channel of mine, and then released again, compiled into a single video, in April 2018. It is this single video compilation that I'm reuploading here.
PLEASE NOTE - I received a hard video copyright ban for the section from 10m53s to 13m26s due to YouTube really not liking 'Hits From The Bong' by Cypress Hill. As such I had to use the new YT beta feature which tries to remove the copyrighted music from the afflicted section without destroying the rest of the audio, and in fairness it's done a decent job but the audio during this section is still sub-optimal.
I remember doing the same nearly 500k spins and hitting 314x as best win IIRC. I was in the original thread when you did this. I just don't think it's possible to hit a full screen of bars as it's clearly set to have a win cap of 500x therefore you'd have normally won a certain amount BEFORE you had the final spin with 3 wild reels held, so it would at best spin in full bars one side and a single the other.
I always thought - as with a lot of slots of that era - that they'd be quoting the best possible spin (so a full screen of bars) and it would be possible, however unlikely, to get beyond that. So it would be a little surprising if that wasn't the case... not that we're talking a vast amount of difference between 250x and 500x anyway.Either way it was quite an eye-opener for me to see such a low volatility game be completely unwilling to offer up even its modest top prize of 500x.