external image

Has Rushmore Been Rogued?

footdr

Banned User: PITA violations of the Forum Rules
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Location
cyberspace
Maybe I am blind. I had to wait very long to be paid several weeks ago. Before I deposit again I wanted to check here to see if the problem has been corrected. Can't find any information. So, checked approved and rouged sections, no Rushmore.

Anyone have further information?
 
Maybe I am blind. I had to wait very long to be paid several weeks ago. Before I deposit again I wanted to check here to see if the problem has been corrected. Can't find any information. So, checked approved and rouged sections, no Rushmore.

Anyone have further information?
They've only been removed from the "Accredited" section via their non-communicative tendencies:

From last week's newsletter:
https://www.casinomeister.com/newsletters/

Rushmore Group Removed From Accredited Casino Section

This sucks. I hate it when a casino group screws up so much that they get booted from the site. Here is what happened: just a few days ago, a member in our forum reported that he was locked out of his casino account at Rushmore. It turns out that his account was considered "dormant" since it had been nearly two years since he last logged into his account. The casino, like many others, has a policy stated in their terms and conditions that accounts that have no activity for over 180 days are closed and the player forfeits his balance. This player supposedly had 1-2k still in his account - and now it's gone. The thing is, the casino never made an attempt to remind the player that the account was approaching dormancy. They just closed his account and that was that. They stated that they were not going to budge on this.

The bottom line is - is this fair? I understand that dormant accounts can pose logistical problems, and yes, there isn't a reason why these accounts aren't closed. But the casino should notify the member beforehand, and if the member comes back, the casino should offer to open the account back up with the original cash balance. To not do this is unfair in my opinion, and is unbecoming of an "Accredited Casino".

The problem was exacerbated by the operator's silence. Not a peep. The only person communicating with us is their casino manager, who seems to be caught between a rock and a hard place. I had the same problem when I was inquiring about the complaints from players springing up in our forum concerning late payments. Now there is talk of delayed payments to affiliates. One PAB from an affiliate has been filed - no response from the affiliate manager yet.

So they are off the site, and consider this a warning shot across the bow. I hope the casino administration comes to its senses and realizes that I don't care that they don't care about being listed at the site. But the players do - as well as many affiliates.

This also prompted me to add a term to the standards of Casinomeister Accredited Casinos:
Must not implement terms that can be construed as "unfair" towards the player.
That's one term I never thought I would have to add.

Get your act together Rushmore.

I guess you don't subscribe to the newsletter :confused:
 
rushmore

I think rushmore is solid apparently they payed out $400,000 to some lucky monkey around 2 weeks ago, maybe that put them in the hole.
 
I think rushmore is solid apparently they payed out $400,000 to some lucky monkey around 2 weeks ago, maybe that put them in the hole.

Have they actually PAID though, this may just be publicity for a big winner. It could also be from a NETWORK progressive, which means it is NOT just Rushmore's money, and payment might be faster coming from, or through, RTG.

If it was $400,000 from normal play, I wonder how many weeks/months/years this would take at their usual withdrawal limits.

The explanations for payment delays, and other issues, have either been absent, or cryptic - never a straight answer that adds up to explaining away all the problems.

The dormant account issue is separate in a way, but IF the group were short of ready cash, taking ruthless advantage of such terms to the letter certainly helps. They probably confiscate many small amounts from dormant accounts without it ever being an issue with the account holder. I am sure I have lost a few pennies from accounts along the way, but this particular case involved such a large sum, and the operator seemed to want this player to forget about it, rather than remind them with the result that they would be back for the money - which was, so far as we know, unbound by any WR at the time it was forgotten.

I find reports of delays in payment to affiliates much more worrying than delayed payments to players in terms of whether the group is suffering cashflow problems. Affiliates feed the business with new players, and should be the last group the operator messes around with on payments.

There was a report about delays in affiliate payments in August, but this was supposedly a "one off", and normal service was then supposed to resume for September onwards - now, are there NEW reports of delays to affiliate payments DESPITE these earlier assurances.
 
Have they actually PAID though, this may just be publicity for a big winner. It could also be from a NETWORK progressive, which means it is NOT just Rushmore's money, and payment might be faster coming from, or through, RTG.

If it was $400,000 from normal play, I wonder how many weeks/months/years this would take at their usual withdrawal limits.

The explanations for payment delays, and other issues, have either been absent, or cryptic - never a straight answer that adds up to explaining away all the problems.

The dormant account issue is separate in a way, but IF the group were short of ready cash, taking ruthless advantage of such terms to the letter certainly helps. They probably confiscate many small amounts from dormant accounts without it ever being an issue with the account holder. I am sure I have lost a few pennies from accounts along the way, but this particular case involved such a large sum, and the operator seemed to want this player to forget about it, rather than remind them with the result that they would be back for the money - which was, so far as we know, unbound by any WR at the time it was forgotten.

I find reports of delays in payment to affiliates much more worrying than delayed payments to players in terms of whether the group is suffering cashflow problems. Affiliates feed the business with new players, and should be the last group the operator messes around with on payments.

There was a report about delays in affiliate payments in August, but this was supposedly a "one off", and normal service was then supposed to resume for September onwards - now, are there NEW reports of delays to affiliate payments DESPITE these earlier assurances.

At $4k a month, it will only take 180 days to finalise the payments, since if the player doesnt log in, he/she will forfeit all funds to the casino :lolup:
 
I think rushmore is solid apparently they payed out $400,000 to some lucky monkey around 2 weeks ago, maybe that put them in the hole.

Hi everyone,

I don't know from where this information was attained, but this is not true.

Concerning withdrawals, everything should be all good and up to date.

As always, please PM me with any issues or questions.

Regards,

Louise
Rushmore, Cherry Red & Slots Oasis Rep.
 
Can't trust anyone any more

Have they actually PAID though, this may just be publicity for a big winner.
yea you are right, that guy could be waiting and wondering about that 400Gs. I sure am glad i didn't win $400,000 from some shady casino. iam gettin chills just thinkin about it, i better go lie down.
 
yea you are right, that guy could be waiting and wondering about that 400Gs. I sure am glad i didn't win $400,000 from some shady casino. iam gettin chills just thinkin about it, i better go lie down.

I can confirm that we do NOT have a $400,000 winner at our casinos. I don't know where you have gotten your information from Lizard, but this is not true.

Thanks,

Louise
Rushmore, Cherry Red & Slots Oasis Rep.
 
I can confirm that we do NOT have a $400,000 winner at our casinos. I don't know where you have gotten your information from Lizard, but this is not true.

Thanks,

Louise
Rushmore, Cherry Red & Slots Oasis Rep.

References please, Lizard

There is a great deal of misinformation on the internet, and this is not the first time such a piece of "information" has proven to be untrue. It could just be an affiliate, or a shill, trying to promote the brand with an exaggerated big win. It could be true, but attributed to the wrong casino. It could even be a misprint, being perhaps 4K, and not 400K.

A casino should notice a 400K winner, and would almost certainly be using it as publicity.

What IS worrying though, are reports of affiliates suffering payment delays. Are these old reports from the summer, or a new problem emerging - more references to sources needed.
 
What IS worrying though, are reports of affiliates suffering payment delays. Are these old reports from the summer, or a new problem emerging - more references to sources needed.
For me, they were OK up til May, then June was 6-days late, I had no earnings in July, August was 3-days late and September is now 5-days late and counting... :(
Something is definitely up in the Rushmore camp, but no-one from the outside seems to know just what.

KK
 
For me, they were OK up til May, then June was 6-days late, I had no earnings in July, August was 3-days late and September is now 5-days late and counting... :(
Something is definitely up in the Rushmore camp, but no-one from the outside seems to know just what.

KK

Well, that's a "new" problem. The promise was that post-August payments would be on time. The delays are small, but persistent. September looks to be as bad as back in July, worse than August - this looks like things are worsening, not improving.


Louise stated:-

Concerning withdrawals, everything should be all good and up to date.

She failed to respond to the point about AFFILIATE payments, but must have seen it in the thread. The reply is again "cryptic", preceeded by "Concerning withdrawals", as to simply state "everything should be all good and up to date" would be untrue for affiliate payments, although could be true for player withdrawals.

Perhaps players could tell us whether Louise is correct in stating that PLAYYER WITHDRAWALS are now up to date.
 
Louise stated:- She failed to respond to the point about AFFILIATE payments, but must have seen it in the thread. The reply is again "cryptic", preceeded by "Concerning withdrawals", as to simply state "everything should be all good and up to date" would be untrue for affiliate payments, although could be true for player withdrawals.

Sorry, I did miss the posts about affiliates having delayed payments due to them.

The payments to affiliates are not done by our casino withdrawals department so I'm not sure the status of these payments nor the reasons for the delays.

I wish I could do more to help out but only the affiliate managers can answer queries on these payments.

Regards,

Louise
Rushmore, Cherry Red & Slots Oasis Rep.
 
For me, they were OK up til May, then June was 6-days late, I had no earnings in July, August was 3-days late and September is now 5-days late and counting... :(
Something is definitely up in the Rushmore camp, but no-one from the outside seems to know just what.

KK
Actually KK, I would consider this an inconvenience, but not something to get too hung up about. If payments are lacking by weeks - or months, then we have a problem.
 
My withdrawals have been pretty ok with rushmore. There was a period 1-2 months ago when it took a few (1-3) weeks to get the cash-in:s , now they are paying within 7 days on e-wallet withdrawals if i just get lucky enough to win.

kavaman
 
I must be in the minority in this area, I just cashed out from Cherry Red and got my withdrawal in 3 days after it was approved :thumbsup:

I got sour on them when it took almost a month to get my first and only win from them, which was over $4000. I've played some there, but only cautious amounts. Frankly I feel like their support staff has become indifferent to the player and not as responsive or supportive as they used to be. My last incident with them was when I was told I would have an email inviting me to quick tender within 2 hours. The email never came and I approached Casino Titan and had my invite within 30 minutes.

I do know Casino Titan pays faster and support is day and night different than Rushmore group. Just my 2c.

I'm not happy that they have become unaccredited, but I'm happy I know because this will cause me to avoid them now. Signs of going rogue are there now.
 
Depositing with Neteller

Hi folks,

i have a notice that i haven't posted on forum in several weeks :D

That's right, because i haven't had much time and i know that i have surely missed something.

Now it's time to ask one thing.

Sorry, if this is the wrong thread or it's already posted then please change it.

It's a question to Louise and Rushmore.


Dear Louise,

can you explain to me why it's not more allowed depositing with Neteller in regarding claiming the weekend bonuses ?


Regards

Zodiac
 
Hi folks,

i have a notice that i haven't posted on forum in several weeks :D

That's right, because i haven't had much time and i know that i have surely missed something.

Now it's time to ask one thing.

Sorry, if this is the wrong thread or it's already posted then please change it.

It's a question to Louise and Rushmore.


Dear Louise,

can you explain to me why it's not more allowed depositing with Neteller in regarding claiming the weekend bonuses ?


Regards

Zodiac

She answered this here :D
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/rushmore-sucky-rule-to-confiscate-funds.33976/
 
Oops, i thought that has already posted but haven't enough time to search.

So, thank you Bryan for the information.

Very bad not allowing to deposit with Neteller.

Since this has changed i haven't deposited more at Rushmore Group. :(


Hi Zodiac,

I'm sorry that you have been affected by this. As you are aware, welcome and weekend bonuses can not not be redeemed on Neteller or Moneybookers deposits. Weekly bonuses are still however redeemable when using these deposit methods.

Kind regards,

Louise
Rushmore, Cherry Red & Slots Oasis Rep.
 
I know that this isn't the right thread to post about but only still this comment

Hey Louise,

how should i recommend this to the european players ?

Should i promote and only saying that Click2Pay or credit card is available ?

For europeans are Neteller and Moneybookers most important deposit methods.

I know that's not your decision but i believe this is not good and you should tell it to the owners.

You have C2Pay as method why not thinking also about click$buy as
method ?

I never heard before that this is happened on a casino.

Regards

Zodiac
 
I know that this isn't the right thread to post about but only still this comment

Hey Louise,

how should i recommend this to the european players ?

Should i promote and only saying that Click2Pay or credit card is available ?

For europeans are Neteller and Moneybookers most important deposit methods.

I know that's not your decision but i believe this is not good and you should tell it to the owners.

You have C2Pay as method why not thinking also about click$buy as
method ?

I never heard before that this is happened on a casino.

Regards

Zodiac

Hi Zodiac,

For now, this is the situation and decision made by the marketing department. If there are any changes, then I'll make sure to post. European players are welcome to use their credit cards instead in order to claim the welcome bonuses and weekend bonuses, or can use their Neteller/Moneybookers account to deposit and redeem the bonuses during the week.

Regards,

Louise
Rushmore, Cherry Red & Slots Oasis Rep.
 
Just a quick announcement that Rushmore is back on board. I spoke with the operator today, and we have a clear means of communication now. :thumbsup:

:confused: You didn't before when they were listed??

Also, did they give you any good reason for the many delayed payments over the previous months? I'm hoping you touched on that issue with them if you are re-listing them as "Accredited".
____
____
 
:confused: You didn't before when they were listed??

Also, did they give you any good reason for the many delayed payments over the previous months? I'm hoping you touched on that issue with them if you are re-listing them as "Accredited".
____
____
Of course I had a means of commo before. It's just that during the last couple of issues, there wasn't the normal amount of communications going on; I wasn't getting the answers that I needed from the operator, and this is the main reason I didn't bring them back on after Elscrabinda was paid.

The operator took the blame for the delayed payments - he had some personal family issues that took most of his time away from the business. He's back in the saddle now, so we're good to go.
 
Just a quick announcement that Rushmore is back on board. I spoke with the operator today, and we have a clear means of communication now. :thumbsup:

Since you now have communication, could you ask what is the "big deal" over Neteller and Moneybookers deposits, yet this is no kind of "deal" at all if these SAME players simply switch over to credit cards, or even Click2Pay.

Neteller and Moneybookers are both REGULATED by the FSA, even if more lightly than the banks, they should be viewed as trustworthy. Quicktender, on the other hand, is rather secretive, being available to US players as a means to get around UIGEA provisions regarding processing of transactions, they are certainly NOT regulated by any trusted jurisdiction that I know of, and are going to "duck & dive" to stay one step ahead of any authority seeking to shut them down as gambling processors.

Credit Cards are VERY prone to fraud, and this brings with it the risk of chargebacks to merchants. The worst fraud is where someone takes credit out in someone else's name by stealing their identity. It can take long enough for this to come to light that any funds used in a casino could get through all the stages of processing, and the cheque cashed. Even stolen cards or details can lead to the scammers getting the money through the system before the rightful card holder discovers something has been going on.

Players themselves can even initiate a chargeback simply because they didn't like the result, and get this past the credit card companies. Neteller and Moneybookers would NOT permit this.

Do the operators of Rushmore REALLY intend this move as a way to encourage players to use cards instead of eWallets, or is there something else going on.

I find that using cards is more problematic that using Neteller, especially so where it is at a casino where I have ONLY used Neteller beforehand. Using cards where the casino currency is not the UK Pound also presents a problem, the fees are HIGHER than those chanrged by Neteller, and I believe Moneybookers fees are also lower than charged by card companies.

If operators believe cards are more secure than eWallets, this is because here in the UK at least, responsibility has passed to the banks from the police, and banks would rather sweep the problem aside, rather than have it form part of "official figures"; hence a wrong impression that cards are MUCH less prone to fraud than a while ago.

In fact, ONLINE fraud has increased DRAMATICALLY, because chip & pin has made it much harder to operate "card present" frauds. Casinos make a damn good target for this, since the money can be retrieved, and usually NOT back to the card from whence it came, but by cheque.

This is another case of Rushmore failing to give a proper answer. The marketing team made a decision, but there MUST be a reason behind it, and asking the simple question "Why?" should be pretty straight forward.

Once we know the thinking, players can decide whether they are prepared to switch deposit methods, or casino.
 
Of course I had a means of commo before. It's just that during the last couple of issues, there wasn't the normal amount of communications going on; I wasn't getting the answers that I needed from the operator, and this is the main reason I didn't bring them back on after Elscrabinda was paid.

The operator took the blame for the delayed payments - he had some personal family issues that took most of his time away from the business. He's back in the saddle now, so we're good to go.

Wow! Finally after all these months we now know the truth and bottom line to all the previous payout issues. This has got to be the worst decision on the part of an operator that I think I have ever read as far as no one ever giving a simple and concise reason for all the previous cloak and dagger type of answers regarding payout issues.

If the operator had of only had a spokesperson come forward and rely this message previously then I believe that the "Rushmore Group" as a whole would have been given the benefit of the doubt and would not have had to suffer all of the bad press they received in all of the forums which has now been archived in all the major search engines.

This issue regarding delayed payouts could have been put to rest back a couple of months ago. Most players I believe would have and can understand circumstances as those when there are family matters that take precedence over business matters. I know I would have.

I certainly do hope that they have learned something from all of this bad press that they have received over the previous months and will not let something as trivial as this turned out to be hold them back in the future from just coming out and making a statement such as you just made above.

Sheesh...that is hard to believe that this operator would allow their reputation to be damaged the way it has been over something like this!
____
____
 
Wow! Finally after all these months we now know the truth and bottom line to all the previous payout issues. This has got to be the worst decision on the part of an operator that I think I have ever read as far as no one ever giving a simple and concise reason for all the previous cloak and dagger type of answers regarding payout issues.

If the operator had of only had a spokesperson come forward and rely this message previously then I believe that the "Rushmore Group" as a whole would have been given the benefit of the doubt and would not have had to suffer all of the bad press they received in all of the forums which has now been archived in all the major search engines.

This issue regarding delayed payouts could have been put to rest back a couple of months ago. Most players I believe would have and can understand circumstances as those when there are family matters that take precedence over business matters. I know I would have.

I certainly do hope that they have learned something from all of this bad press that they have received over the previous months and will not let something as trivial as this turned out to be hold them back in the future from just coming out and making a statement such as you just made above.

Sheesh...that is hard to believe that this operator would allow their reputation to be damaged the way it has been over something like this!
____
____

Surely SOMEBODY in the organisation knew of this, so WHY was this not relayed down to the CS and accounts departments so that players could be given the correct answer.
Many of the reasons given for delayed payments had NOTHING to do with someone important being away dealing with family issues. ANY business should also take steps to ensure that if a KEY member of staff is unexpectedly absent, there are OTHER staff able to take control to ensure that the business does not suffer.
NO-ONE can predict this kind of event, so this MUST be something that is planned for right from the start.
It could take a long time for this explanation to circulate around the net to undo the damage done by the lengthy delays, and speculation amidst a lack of explanation from the operator.
 
I think you are reading into too much of what I said. The problems they had with the processing were legit, but some things are always dealt with by the operator (for instance moving funds from here to there). He wasn't available all of the time, so this can cause problems.

This is all water under the bridge. Players have been paid, the affs have been paid, and no one has been screwed over, right?
 
Surely SOMEBODY in the organisation knew of this, so WHY was this not relayed down to the CS and accounts departments so that players could be given the correct answer.
Many of the reasons given for delayed payments had NOTHING to do with someone important being away dealing with family issues. ANY business should also take steps to ensure that if a KEY member of staff is unexpectedly absent, there are OTHER staff able to take control to ensure that the business does not suffer.
NO-ONE can predict this kind of event, so this MUST be something that is planned for right from the start.
It could take a long time for this explanation to circulate around the net to undo the damage done by the lengthy delays, and speculation amidst a lack of explanation from the operator.

I totally agree Vinyl, if all business were run such as that. The industrialized world would come to a screeching halt!
____
____
 
I totally agree Vinyl, if all business were run such as that. The industrialized world would come to a screeching halt!
____
____
Umm, it's a small business - not William Hill. :rolleyes: I think you guys are blowing this out of proportion...
 
I think you are reading into too much of what I said. The problems they had with the processing were legit, but some things are always dealt with by the operator (for instance moving funds from here to there). He wasn't available all of the time, so this can cause problems.

Exactly, that was my point of them not just coming forth and stating that. That would have been a simple explanation that most players could have got on board with.


This is all water under the bridge. Players have been paid, the affs have been paid, and no one has been screwed over, right?

Agreed. :cool:
____
____
 
casinomeister i dont know how to contact you im new but

I think you are reading into too much of what I said. The problems they had with the processing were legit, but some things are always dealt with by the operator (for instance moving funds from here to there). He wasn't available all of the time, so this can cause problems.

This is all water under the bridge. Players have been paid, the affs have been paid, and no one has been screwed over, right?


i have a problem concerning a check i have left a post about it can you please check it and give me some advice thanks in advance
 
i have a problem concerning a check i have left a post about it can you please check it and give me some advice thanks in advance
I've moved the post here:
Link Outdated / Removed

You should be okay - I've already PMd Louise (bear in mind it's late at night here). You should hear back from her in the next 12-24 hours
 
Umm, it's a small business - not William Hill. :rolleyes: I think you guys are blowing this out of proportion...

Even if the operator was only there part of the time, how was it that Louise NEVER offered this explanation. This has nothing to do with the business being small, in fact, for a small business, it is LESS excusable that no-one else seemed to know what was happening, and were churning out what they THOUGHT was happening, which lead to half-truths, and inconsistent stories. THIS is what did the damage, NOT the operator being unavailable to carry out his/her duties for much of the time.

Louise DID tell us once that payments were delayed because accounts were awaiting movement of funds, but she did NOT say why, so we all started to speculate that it had something to do with liquidity within the business, rather than key personnel being unavailable.

I still find it hard to believe that employees of a SMALL business failed to notice the boss was away.

Rushmore now has to rebuild the trust in the brand, and the quickest way to do this is to ensure this IS "water under the bridge", and that a sudden end to all these problems is seen by players, who will in turn post of this in the various forums.
 
how was it that Louise NEVER offered this explanation

Maybe Louise didn't think it was her place to talk about one of her co-workers, maybe the family problem was very bad and he didn't want it out in the open, maybe Louise didn't want to bother him in his time with his family...there could be many reasons.
 
Maybe Louise didn't think it was her place to talk about one of her co-workers, maybe the family problem was very bad and he didn't want it out in the open, maybe Louise didn't want to bother him in his time with his family...there could be many reasons.

Unfortunately, the problem was impacting severely on CUSTOMERS. If customers were not affected, there would be no need to reveal this kind of issue, but something NEEDED to be said because of the sheer length of time this was happening, and this made any explanations of "temporary processor problems" look like a cover up of something more serious.

Louise is not particularly high up, but it seems NO-ONE had any authority to do, or say, anything without the permission of ONE key person, the boss.

Hopefully, this thread will also get archived, and the true reason for the delays thus circulated around the net.
 
Umm, it's a small business - not William Hill. :rolleyes: I think you guys are blowing this out of proportion...

Nothing to do with it. They still have unleft questions.

Personally I think it has to do with cashflow, and nothing to do with the concoction they have come up with.

Sounds like they are having financial cashflow issues, and alot of players are using Neteller, so they ban that, so they have less players depositing/cashouts, hence the reason why Neteller has been stopped for promotions.

Also the same reason why they are using lame excuses to not pay this player $2K!

They have never admitted that they have paid slowly, never apologised, and still havent come out themselves (bsides for using Bryan as their tool) to explain the reasoning

I think its a bad move putting them back, until they proove themselves, beyond doubt, its not a cashflow issue.
 
Nothing to do with it. They still have unleft questions.

Personally I think it has to do with cashflow, and nothing to do with the concoction they have come up with.

Sounds like they are having financial cashflow issues, and alot of players are using Neteller, so they ban that, so they have less players depositing/cashouts, hence the reason why Neteller has been stopped for promotions.

Also the same reason why they are using lame excuses to not pay this player $2K!
They have never admitted that they have paid slowly, never apologised, and still havent come out themselves (bsides for using Bryan as their tool) to explain the reasoning

I think its a bad move putting them back, until they proove themselves, beyond doubt, its not a cashflow issue.

I thought they reviewed this, and allowed the player to have their account reinstated, and WITH the confiscated funds in it. All the player has to do is comply with documentation, and presumably they can withdraw it.
They also reopened communications with Bryan, so this supports the view that the former lack of communication was due to the one DOING the communicating being away dealing with the family issues.

The Neteller question though, has NOT been answered other than a generic "policy decision" type of answer. They need to TELL us what the problem is with Neteller, otherwise this will fuel speculation, as it seems a VERY odd decision indeed to ban a deposit method, rather than individual players, or groups of players, from the weekend and welcome bonuses.
If it were about "bonus abuse", they would ban the players involved, NOT just let them switch to credit cards, and continue "abusing" the weekend and welcome bonus. Neteller are so restrictive about which countries they will allow for gambling transactions that any player likely to have access to Neteller for gambling transactions should have no trouble finding an alternative card to use for the weekend bonus.
This ban will only make for complications with withdrawals, because bonus players who primarily use Neteller will start using BOTH; Neteller during the week, and their cards at the weekend. This means that withdrawals will be complicated by how they are allocated back to deposit methods, and this in turn will lead to players EXPECTING withdrawals in the same manner, usually back to Neteller, but receiving them in another way instead, probably by cheque, or even back to the card. They may well think upon checking their Neteller account for the money, that the old payment problems have returned, since cheques can take days, if not weeks, to arrive in the post, and cards tend to take a few days to post a refund back to the account.
 
I thought they reviewed this, and allowed the player to have their account reinstated, and WITH the confiscated funds in it. All the player has to do is comply with documentation, and presumably they can withdraw it.
They also reopened communications with Bryan, so this supports the view that the former lack of communication was due to the one DOING the communicating being away dealing with the family issues.

The Neteller question though, has NOT been answered other than a generic "policy decision" type of answer. They need to TELL us what the problem is with Neteller, otherwise this will fuel speculation, as it seems a VERY odd decision indeed to ban a deposit method, rather than individual players, or groups of players, from the weekend and welcome bonuses.
If it were about "bonus abuse", they would ban the players involved, NOT just let them switch to credit cards, and continue "abusing" the weekend and welcome bonus. Neteller are so restrictive about which countries they will allow for gambling transactions that any player likely to have access to Neteller for gambling transactions should have no trouble finding an alternative card to use for the weekend bonus.
This ban will only make for complications with withdrawals, because bonus players who primarily use Neteller will start using BOTH; Neteller during the week, and their cards at the weekend. This means that withdrawals will be complicated by how they are allocated back to deposit methods, and this in turn will lead to players EXPECTING withdrawals in the same manner, usually back to Neteller, but receiving them in another way instead, probably by cheque, or even back to the card. They may well think upon checking their Neteller account for the money, that the old payment problems have returned, since cheques can take days, if not weeks, to arrive in the post, and cards tend to take a few days to post a refund back to the account.
The question is, ofcourse this one was returned, the question is if all other accounts that have been effected (I am sure there are other accunts in this situation), were they refunded.

I would like to hear a comment about it from them.

"Reopened" communication with Bryan is a start, but communicating within the forum is just as important. If they cant come up with a realistic and honest reason, then as far as I am concerened they are as cloased as they were till now.

I think they haven't proven themselves at all, and secondly, vote with your $$$$
 
Just a quick announcement that Rushmore is back on board. I spoke with the operator today, and we have a clear means of communication now. :thumbsup:

Bryan, While I respect your decision to bring this group back on board I would have thought that they needed to earn this previlege by at least being more communicative to players rather than simply reversing a decision that is unacceptable to most.

I bear no grudges against this group but imo their behavior is a couple of notches below the standard of an accredited casino. In this industry the accredited list is the equivalent of a 'who's who' in the gaming world and definitely the cream of the crop.
 
FWIW you are incorrect to assume that this change was made solely on the grounds that they were "simply reversing a decision that is unacceptable to most." A lot of 'behind the scenes' stuff has been going on regarding this issue.
 
Max,

This is where the problem lies. Knowing Bryan, I am sure he has done a lot of 'donkey work' to ensure this group complies with his strict standards before it comes back on board. However, many players have not been treated well by this group in the past few months and on the face of it, it seemed that their re-accreditation came on the back of a reversal of the dubious decision to confiscate funds from a dormant account which is ridiculous.

I have never doubted either Bryan's or your integrity but surely it would be helpful to shed a little more light on how the re-accreditation came about. For casinos that newly achieve that status there are no qualms about it but given the fact that there were so many issues with Rushmore in the past few months surely it pays to be a little more transparent here on the quick re-accreditation.
 
Sorry Chu but I'm not a big fan of the "show us why we should believe you" school of website management.

I know from my PAB experience that a lot of what we do works because of the 'in between' position we hold, and a lot of that means we know things on both sides that have no place on the forums.

Doubtless Bryan will provide details as he deems appropriate but I have to say that this trend towards always asking for full disclosure seems seriously misguided to me.

The bottom line is that if we complied with these "show me" requests as often as we see them we'd probably be slitting our own throats. We simply couldn't do what we do if we hung all the laundry out in public.
 
True, and the question is why do they leave it to you to hang out their dirty laundry , cant they answer simple questions themselves, or do they need a pupet constantly :confused:

Why cant they come out themselves. They have never explained anything themselves, give you something to wonder.

I agree its speculation, but the fact they have never come clean with anything, only shows that the speculation probably has alot of truth.

Why not step up, throw them out, and let them prove themselves without you or Bryanj having to have to answer simple questions, which ought to be answered by an reputable brand. I have yet to hear Roulette69 come with a silly excuse such as this, (2 weeks for waiting withdrawals, wierd or no responses), and they are probably alot smaller than Rushmore. They make themselves sound so big, with all the different departments, (I believe its actually ALL Louise), reminds me of my post here https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/operations-room.32470/

Dont you feel you are getting whipped constantly because of them? They need the sling, and let them prove themselves.

Becoming accredited then losing it, should require alot more than just the original accreditation, the simple reason being that even though they were accredited, they did not do anything initially, with all their problems
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top