Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Online Casino and Poker Complaints > Online Casino and Poker Complaints - old section

Notices

Online Casino and Poker Complaints - old section These complaints are no longer current

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 30th March 2006, 11:59 PM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 402
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 5
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 145
Rep Power: 22
Dirk Diggler is on a distinguished roadDirk Diggler is on a distinguished road
Good to see that Bryan has done the right thing and rogued these selective followers of t&cs.

I must say it's now even more blatantly obvious that these selectively invoked this underage rule after seeing they had no problems with the player having accounts at SIX of their casinos when they were an overall loser . Yeah, they could have been following protocol to let the player cashout a $5K win when they were an overall loser, and only envoke it when the player had a big win that put them in profit ...... then OJ Simpson may have actually NOT murdered his ex-wife. My personal opinion on both is exactly the same as the the US civil courts.

Bryan - I can accept your support of eCOGRA on this occasion (though not entirely agree with it), but the question that needs to be answered is how on earth can eCOGRA continue to 'approve' this group?

If they do after this fiasco (and lets not forget their regular other mishaps,
Refuse bonus after INVITING player/ Unclear T&Cs/ eCOGRA wrongly backing them!! - to name but a few) how can any player seriously rely on ecogra approved casinos?
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 12:00 AM
suzecat's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Trona, CA USA!!!
Posts: 1,154
WTGs: 31
WTGd at 22 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 807
Thanked 881 Times in 444 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 4542
Rep Power: 45
suzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond reputesuzecat has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by caruso


You covered pretty much all angles there. Still sucks for the player, but I suppose she can take some "comfort" from the fact that the casino emerges from this with its credibility and reputation around its ankles, and in as public a manner as is possible.

Kudos for that caruso! Timely topic as this is being tossed about here in the US (underage gambling). It would seem prudent to conclude this fiasco with the casinos taking a firm stand on their due diligence operation, unless of course, they are not that interested in cementing their ability to do business with US players. Kyl, et al., are using the underage card to promote their argument against internet gambling. Take that away and much of the steam evaporates. Just a thought.
__________________
Two blondes froze to death at the drive-in movie. They went to see Closed for Winter.
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 12:07 AM
jetset's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,369
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 876
Thanked 2,944 Times in 1,387 Posts
Nominated 7 Times in 2 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 15699
Rep Power: 161
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
QUOTE: i think grandprive have had this one coming to them for a long time. UNQUOTE

I'd have to agree with this. Over the past year they just seem to have gone to hell in a handbasket, and one can only wonder how they have dropped off so steeply.
__________________
jetset
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 12:28 AM
Banned User - repetitive violations of posting rule 1.6
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: England
Posts: 1,674
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 141 Times in 63 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 0
Rep Power: 0
caruso seems to be zero at this point
Prive should certainly now be a strong candidate for the first ever eCOGRA delisting. Can they realistically be allowed to carry the seal at this point? Surely not.
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 12:36 AM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 402
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 5
Thanked 27 Times in 17 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 145
Rep Power: 22
Dirk Diggler is on a distinguished roadDirk Diggler is on a distinguished road
Whatever happens from now on I believe this is a bit of a travesty for the whole industry.

eCOGRA are supposedly the regulator in the industry that are independent and going to bring it into the 20th (forget 21st by this behaviour) century. But they allow an approved member to confiscate $20K from an underage gambler and profit from it.....All that does is feed many players opinions that all they are is MGS/Cassava under another name.

I personally thought/hoped the industry was passed this, but while sh*t like this continues to happen I'm not surprised to see US politicians trying to ban online gambling. It can only fuel their argument that it is protecting US citizens.
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 12:53 AM
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 947
WTGs: 17
WTGd at 32 Times in 6 Posts
Thanks: 940
Thanked 348 Times in 160 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1907
Rep Power: 41
paul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant futurepaul02085 has a brilliant future
Thank you Casinomeister for doing the right thing. Ever since i first read about this situation i have felt it was a scam job by Grand Prive. Their refusal to give the money to a charity (a very fair way to settle this IMO) shows it was about the money all along.

I surely think Ecogra will delist Grand Prive and rightly so.

My main point is that Casinomeister has proven again that he stands for what is right, not what is "politically expedient" and this deepens my respect for him more than ever.

Thank you again Mr. Meister
__________________
paul02085
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 01:44 AM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 402
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 105
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 80
Rep Power: 31
amandajm has been spending a lot of time in the forum
Of course Bella are rogue. I agree.

Not based on non compliance of Nevada law(s) though. I wish you never went for this Bryan.

Ladbrokes apparently ok. (no us players accepted)
Con apparently rogue. (us players accepted)
32red apparently rogue. (changed their minds to accept us players)

Quote:
Ladbrokes Restricted Territories
We cannot open accounts, or process bets or financial transactions, for individuals residing in USA or Germany.

We accept only horse racing, greyhound racing, casino and poker bets, and not lotto, Balls, or other games bets, from individuals residing in Holland.

We accept only sports bets from individuals residing in Gibraltar. We do not take any bets from residents of Hong Kong whilst they are in Hong Kong. However, Hong Kong residents can have an account and deposit money whilst in Hong Kong for use when outwith the territory.

We also reserve the right to request proof of residence from persons who wish to use credit cards issued in restricted territories to pay for transactions. It is the responsibility of each individual customer to ensure that they comply completely with their own local, national or state laws concerning betting, prior to them registering, or before placing a bet.
Quote:
888.com Terms
Cassava Enterprises (Gibraltar) Limited is fully licensed and regulated by the relevant laws of the Gaming Ordinance of Gibraltar for the purposes of operating an Internet Casino under the name: Casino-on-Net.

Such gambling, however, may not be legal in some jurisdictions under certain conditions, and in some jurisdictions may not be legal under any conditions. Please verify the laws in your jurisdiction before registering and read our terms and conditions carefully:

Age
No-one under the age of 18 or the age of legal consent for engaging in the activities included in the Service under the laws of any jurisdiction that applies to you, whichever is greater, may download the Software or use the Service under any circumstances and any person under the age of 18 or the age of legal consent for engaging in gambling activities under the laws of any jurisdiction that applies to you, whichever is greater....

Compliance with Laws
Internet gambling may not be legal in some jurisdictions. You understand and accept that the Company is unable to provide you with any legal advice or assurances and that you are solely responsible for verifying and complying with the law in any jurisdiction that applies to you before registering. The Service is directed only towards users who are not prohibited by the laws of any applicable jurisdiction from gambling on the Internet. The Company does not intend to enable you to contravene applicable law. You represent, warrant and agree to ensure that you comply with all applicable laws, statutes and regulations in relation to your use of the Software and the Service.
Quote:
32red Restricted Territories
Restricted Territories
It is the responsibility of each individual to ensure that by joining 32Red they do not breach any local laws before registering. Please note that individuals residing in the following countries are not able to join the 32Red Casino or Multiplayer Poker Room, and play for real money.

# Gibraltar
# Hong Kong

Player Responsibility
Player Responsibility

Please check the laws surrounding Internet gaming in the jurisdiction in which you are located before you register and read carefully our terms and conditions. The placement of bets by minors is an offence. Please note all players must be at least 18 years of age. Providing false information relating to age, name and address may also constitute an offence.
I disagree with this can of worms being opened. Pay the girl or every casino must copy Ladbrokes.

It is not often I am less harsh than the Meister. Good to see, whether I agree or not.

I just don't want to see the Meister close for lack of adverts, but as it stands are'nt all the casinos promoted here as much in breach as Grand Prive?
__________________
joeyl
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 02:12 AM
GemG7's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: US
Posts: 249
WTGs: 3
WTGd at 16 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 90
Thanked 184 Times in 47 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1020
Rep Power: 25
GemG7 has much to be proud ofGemG7 has much to be proud ofGemG7 has much to be proud ofGemG7 has much to be proud ofGemG7 has much to be proud ofGemG7 has much to be proud ofGemG7 has much to be proud ofGemG7 has much to be proud of
What I don't get is the previous cash out for $5000. The first time I cashed out at a Grand Prive Casino(CGB) it was August 2005 and I had to send them a copy of my drivers license and utility bill and that cashout was for a little more then $1000. Wouldn't they have asked Autumn12 for the same identification documents when she cashed out the previous $5000? Surely they would have seen she was underage and living in Nevada before she hit the 20K? Did they turn a blind eye then because it was under 10K?
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 03:28 AM
spearmaster's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Heaven
Posts: 5,332
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 3 Times in 1 Post
Thanks: 266
Thanked 532 Times in 320 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 3320
Rep Power: 15
spearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond reputespearmaster has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrollock
it wouldnt be that expensive for them to add a few lines of code to the software to check the age and country, jeez i could write it in basic now

10 rem check age and country
20 if country$="usa" and age<21 then print "you are not old enough to play at this casino, so f*** off"
LOL - exactly something I would have done (that's BASIC before it became a bit more structured) But nowadays, I can also write that in structured BASIC, plus Perl, Javascript, PHP, SHTML, and of course VBScript to boot!

The whole point is - they didn't do it - whether from ignorance, forgetfulness, laziness, whatever - one thing for sure, they cannot claim that it was too hard or complicated to do.
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 31st March 2006, 03:42 AM
Trezz's Avatar
crack that whip!
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 818
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 215
Thanked 199 Times in 126 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1168
Rep Power: 21
Trezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud ofTrezz has much to be proud of
Send a message via Skype™ to Trezz
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetset
Over the past year they just seem to have gone to hell in a handbasket, and one can only wonder how they have dropped off so steeply.
The downhill turn coincides with Marc's replacement.

The feasibility that the upper echelons within Grand Prive` are unaware of major problems that the left & right hands are causing begs strong opposition imo.


I'm sorry but this next part I'm sure this will ruffles a few people's feathers, if not bust the hinges on Pandora’s box.

For example eCogra, in my view it's a huge conflict of interest. MGS/CON funded its set-up costs and both CEO's (MGS & CON) sit on the board of Directors.

Whilst I acknowledge the high calibre of Independent Directors, as you can see their sole purpose is to gauge which software developers are accepted as members & what operators can display the eCogra Seal. Apart from Casino On Net the rest are all MG casinos.

Can you say "BIASED" boys and girls.

Hence I'm kind of lost understanding the obvious witch hunt that took place over SafeBet (RTG's excomm'd players protection seal). Yet here is eCogra sealing 99% of MG casinos, whilst on the other hand is doing nothing about a Sealed Casino that is on the verge of rogue status. Personally I don't see the difference between the two!


Visiting the following URL: http://www.ecogra.com/About/DEFAULT.asp

eCogra states "The primary objective of eCOGRA is to provide player protection, by providing comfort to the player that the games are fair, the player will be paid timeously and treated fairly, and that the operators will behave responsibly. Players will be assured of this when they transact with online gaming sites displaying the eCOGRA Seal of Approval."

And Grand Prive` Group conforms to these guidelines

IMO the problem with this industry is the industry itself. Too many people in bed with each other, Casino Managers & so forth with fictional names like Sunny Daze (synonymous with a porn star) and covert PO Boxes as registered Company addresses, to name but a few of the major problems.

Instead of the hat being passed around the industry to collect money for its yearly slush fund for lobbyists, why on earth it does not subscribing to the thought that prevention is far better than its cure, is yet another reasons imo this industry keeps shooting itself in the foot.

Add the latest string of non payment issues, the number of rogue operators still active still robbing American's (and others) blind, it really does go from bad to worse.

Is it really any wonder then why the US Government and others want to ban this industry.

I wanted add of course there are exceptions, take 32Red and others who offer a stella performance and operate way above expectations.

Last edited by Trezz; 31st March 2006 at 04:34 AM.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ive had it with microgaming amatrine Online Casinos 9 16th October 2005 05:12 PM
Does Microgaming know what they are doing??? bighawk Ask the Casinomeister 18 16th January 2003 08:27 PM
Is BellaVegas nuts?? jpm Online Casinos 4 16th April 2002 11:09 PM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk