Live Casino With Real Dealers on TV & Online?

[frankdelb]

I heard that live casino games are more trustable because you see everyting clearly and live. And some automated casinos might fake the results.

For example, I tried thi live and on TV or online casino and have some famous presenters such as Naomi Millbank-Smith.

*snip*

You think it is more trustable?

[mrjones]

hello , seems theyre alot better than doing battle with those rng softwares , but its down to your personal choice realy, i play alot of live games as i get fed up with being stuffed by the machine rng ,i played at a casino called blackorchidcasino last week opened a new account there & tbh the staff was great & support was realy good i would reccomend them anytime , i even had a nice cash out which was done in under one hour via netteller account so a big thumbs up for that live casino.there slots are abit crap though & i ve yet to give blackjack a try but eveything seems ok with payments & stuff , which is the most important thing far as im concerned ,good luck

[NicolasJohnson]

Well many people may FEEL more comfortable with a Live Casino. Just like people feel more comfortable driving that flying.

But software IS more reliable than live games. It is easier for a dealer to learn how to calculate where the roulette ball will fall or sneak in extra cards than it is to tamper with a software that is certified and proven to give a certain exact % payback and be truly random.

As I said, it depends on what you feel more comfortable. But Live isn't as trust worthy as you might think and automated may be more trust worthy than you might think. *

* Having said that you can be cheated at each. That is why place like here; CasinoMeister are so important, so you players have a place that will make sure you get treated fairly and for those places that don't treat players fairly, there is the Casino Meister Rogue list!

Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager

[bakonlin]

Well many people may FEEL more comfortable with a Live Casino. Just like people feel more comfortable driving that flying.

But software IS more reliable than live games. It is easier for a dealer to learn how to calculate where the roulette ball will fall or sneak in extra cards than it is to tamper with a software that is certified and proven to give a certain exact % payback and be truly random.

As I said, it depends on what you feel more comfortable. But Live isn't as trust worthy as you might think and automated may be more trust worthy than you might think. *

* Having said that you can be cheated at each. That is why place like here; CasinoMeister are so important, so you players have a place that will make sure you get treated fairly and for those places that don't treat players fairly, there is the Casino Meister Rogue list!

Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager

Formerly I got also the feeling that live game is fair and the software can be set up according to the casino desired.
But already 1 year I played roulette or bacarat software,I think the later also fair because many times I won.Maybe playing live I was becoming impatience because took a longer time,mostly lost.

[dealer wins]

Formerly I got also the feeling that live game is fair and the software can be set up according to the casino desired.
But already 1 year I played roulette or bacarat software,I think the later also fair because many times I won.Maybe playing live I was becoming impatience because took a longer time,mostly lost.

After becoming disillusioned with software blackjack im am now playing live dealer only and im telling you its completely different. It feels like proper blackjack rather than constant "dodgy" dealer 21s when you have 20 etc etc

Best thing since the advent of online casinos if you ask me.

[Simmo!]

Probably a good idea to ask the Live Casino what auditing strategy they have in place. A long time back there was an instance at Ladbrokes where a dealer was seen to deal incorrectly and at that time there was no way to check. I know Microgaming have developed a clever video indexing system which acts like their PlayCheck system for instances such as this so it's possible there are similar systems in place at other sites.

[Wildfire7]

But software IS more reliable than live games. It is easier for a dealer to learn how to calculate where the roulette ball will fall or sneak in extra cards than it is to tamper with a software that is certified and proven to give a certain exact % payback and be truly random.

As I said, it depends on what you feel more comfortable. But Live isn't as trust worthy as you might think and automated may be more trust worthy than you might think. *

Agreed! Although I personally have never doubted either version of the game is unfair, if playing at a reputable place.

The Live version is played at a much slower pace, giving the illusion it is somehow fairer. Personally I can see that if anything underhand was taking place, then it would be at a live table.

The visual interaction is only a one way process, what you are seeing "live" may not be quite what you think it is. You could even argue that they are not live at all, and the games are simply pre-recorded, or on some kind of timer delay so hands can be switched.

Mike

[frankdelb]

Has anyone tried Smart Live Casino?

*snip*

I gave it a go and looks like a really fun place to play. You can play with live dealers online or on TV (SKY 869, Freesat 852).

[Scooter7]

Has anyone tried Smart Live Casino?



I gave it a go and looks like a really fun place to play. You can play with live dealers online or on TV (SKY 869, Freesat 852).

Over/Under line on the link getting snipped from this spam/shill is 11 minutes

[eu_lowroller]

I think he spammed this link 2 weeks before, but maxd have deleted this spamlink! http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...ted-games.html