SlotOCash, slot configured to 65% payout

**Nifty29** · 25th May 2010, 02:06 PM

Originally Posted by bernynhel

So, let me understand, if a declaration isn't made ragarding changes in game payout %'s, you will go forward with the expectation that no such changes have been made? And you think thats better than "I just figure...?

The difference is I have concrete and irrefutable evidence - as anyone who has played Cleo over the years will attest to. It is not the same as "I dont get as much playtime any more" or "I just cant cashout" or "these slots dont pay like they used to" etc etc- this is a definite payout alteration that anybody can check for themselves. It isnt me saying "I reckon the RTP has changed" - I know it has as result of the change in payouts as described in my previous post......so I would not go on in the expectation that no changes have been made because I can prove that they have. ( FWIW I am not aware of any case of MG or RTG changing what a combination etc pays)

Is this better than "I just figure"?. Yes.

**bernynhel** · 25th May 2010, 02:33 PM

Originally Posted by Nifty29

The difference is I have concrete and irrefutable evidence - as anyone who has played Cleo over the years will attest to. It is not the same as "I dont get as much playtime any more" or "I just cant cashout" or "these slots dont pay like they used to" etc etc- this is a definite payout alteration that anybody can check for themselves. It isnt me saying "I reckon the RTP has changed" - I know it has as result of the change in payouts as described in my previous post......so I would not go on in the expectation that no changes have been made because I can prove that they have. ( FWIW I am not aware of any case of MG or RTG changing what a combination etc pays)

Is this better than "I just figure"?. Yes.

OK. Terrific. I got all that. That doesn't address the changes to RTP to games that are not obvious and that no player can check for themselves. My point is why dwell on this one game where you have irrefutable proof if it's going on all around you, anyway? And then, what do you do with this proof? And since you do have proof, why can't that also mean that the same is, in all likelihood, also happening where the proof is not evident? Why would one operator out of all operators, alter RTP on one game, out of all games, when all operators have the same ability in regards to all games? lol Hey, we can both agree that the other one is nuts - that's OK by me.

**GrandMaster** · 25th May 2010, 11:40 PM

Originally Posted by bernynhel

Why wouldn't every site which falls under some type of licensing jurisdiction be required to post, clearly visible on every website page and on every gamescreen in their software: IS THE CASINO GAME YOU ARE PLAYING NOW CROOKED? IF YOU THINK IT IS THEN IT IS YOUR DUTY TO CALL THE PANAMA GAMING COMMISSION AT 1-866-555-5050 OR SIMPLY ENTER CTRL+! ON YOUR PC KEYBOARD FOR AN IMMEDIATE AUDIT AND SHAKEDOWN OF YOUR HOST ONLINE CASINO!!!

I can think of a few people here who would demand an audit every time they lost a spin on a slot machine.