Rushmore removed from the Accredited Section

[Embalu]

Hi everyone, it's good to be back. I made a short post here (post #157):
http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...hioned-16.html

I believe that Embalu's case is one where reasonable people can disagree.

Fact is Embalu admittedly gave the casino false info, for whatever reason, when he opened his account. After that all bets are off, at least imo. I know others disagree with me and I respect their opinions. I just hope they respect my opinion in return.

No, I have never given false info to the casino. Just the casino said this but it was not true and at the end they admitted their mistake and paid me in full. My data and address was also verified by the investigator when I met him face-to-face.

If anyone is interested in the details of the story, here are some links:

Originally, I posted the detailed description of the issue here:
http://mb.winneronline.com/showthread.html?t=39248

The main discussion about the story is here (a bit long, now it has almost 400 post):
http://www.gamblingindustryassociati...ead.php?t=2584

Another discussion in this forum:
http://www.gpwa.org/forum/rushmore-c...en-188956.html

Warnings of webmasters about the issue:
http://online_casino_news.hundredper...s-with-no.html
and
http://gambling-mojo-casino-communit...arning_36.html

Complaint at askgamblers.com:
http://www.askgamblers.com/casino-co...es-e-mails-c83

Also, Steve Russo from gamblinggrumbles.com will update his report in a few days, I will post the link here when it is done.

[maxd]

I don't mean to sound offensive, but is this the only reason behind the demotion to non accredited?

FYI, Bryan stated in his original post that it was not:

There have been several issues in the past concerning the Rushmore group, and that's about it for me.

[Embalu]

As I promised, here is Steve Russo's report about the issue:
http://www.gamblinggrumbles.com/Repo...on-and-payment

[tat00]

holy cow what an amazing story - i read it all (2 hours) .
and what support u had the whole time from people who cared that was the awsome part
good luck

[maphesto]

How could you remain calm this time Embalu?

I'm impressed!

[Embalu]

tat00 and maphesto: Thanks for the kind words!

[missmichelle]

I read everything I could about it. You never once lost your cool. I am so glad you finally got paid, you sure deserved it. It was also great to see everyone working together to get this resolved.

Michelle

[vinylweatherman]

Hi everyone, it's good to be back. I made a short post here (post #157):
http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...hioned-16.html



No, I have never given false info to the casino. Just the casino said this but it was not true and at the end they admitted their mistake and paid me in full. My data and address was also verified by the investigator when I met him face-to-face.

If anyone is interested in the details of the story, here are some links:

Originally, I posted the detailed description of the issue here:
http://mb.winneronline.com/showthread.html?t=39248

The main discussion about the story is here (a bit long, now it has almost 400 post):
http://www.gamblingindustryassociati...ead.php?t=2584

Another discussion in this forum:
http://www.gpwa.org/forum/rushmore-c...en-188956.html

Warnings of webmasters about the issue:
http://online_casino_news.hundredper...s-with-no.html
and
http://gambling-mojo-casino-communit...arning_36.html

Complaint at askgamblers.com:
http://www.askgamblers.com/casino-co...es-e-mails-c83

Also, Steve Russo from gamblinggrumbles.com will update his report in a few days, I will post the link here when it is done.

Well! That just takes the piss. Their OWN investigation cleared you, yet they STILL didn't want to pay, and you had to fight on.

When this was happening, we were told that the end point was a face to face meeting with their investigators, who would either verify your honesty, or find your credentials proven inaccurate. This was also given as the reason for the considerable length of time this investigation had taken.

Given that these verification procedures DO have errors, why do casinos still insist on thinking of them as 100% accurate, and not even contemplating that they might be wrong without a huge amount of pressure being applied.

[Luckylizzy]

Does this mean Rushmore is a bad online casino choice or is it just that it doesn't live up to the Meister's high standards? I do agree that this site is one of the only sites where we can count on fairness but I thought Rushmore was a really good online casino up until I read this thread. Should we stop playing at Rushmore now?

[Casinomeister]

Does this mean Rushmore is a bad online casino choice or is it just that it doesn't live up to the Meister's high standards? I do agree that this site is one of the only sites where we can count on fairness but I thought Rushmore was a really good online casino up until I read this thread. Should we stop playing at Rushmore now?

Playing there is strictly up to you. They don't meet the standards to be listed on this site, so it's up to you to decide what to do.