I've had no choice but to renew our old Warning against Grand Duke: see WARNING Grand Duke: no pay and questionable practices.
![]() |
![]() |
I've had no choice but to renew our old Warning against Grand Duke: see WARNING Grand Duke: no pay and questionable practices.
Useful links: Accredited Casinos & Poker Rooms ~ Casino Reps ~ Warnings ~ Rogue Pit ~ "No Can Do" ~ Forum Rules
NEW! CM's Annual Awards: Best and Worst in Online Gambling for 2011
Pitch-A-Bitch Stuff: read the PAB FAQ, Submit a PAB (don't forget to read the FAQ!), or dig around in the PAB Archives.
Other stuff: Max's Blog (ICE reports, editorials, et al). Feeling generous? ... Max's Wish List at Amazon!
Gremmyboy (2nd November 2011)
FWIW the OP's PAB has been concluded in favour of the casino.
The PAB was based on a claim that the player had fully completed the Terms of one bonus before redepositing. Casino documents show this to be incorrect, the previous bonus had not been cleared at the time of redeposit and as such the redeposit was subject to the currently active bonus Terms. Case closed.
That said the Warning still stands.
Also, I've merged the OP's two threads on this subject since they were basically two parts of the same issue.
Useful links: Accredited Casinos & Poker Rooms ~ Casino Reps ~ Warnings ~ Rogue Pit ~ "No Can Do" ~ Forum Rules
NEW! CM's Annual Awards: Best and Worst in Online Gambling for 2011
Pitch-A-Bitch Stuff: read the PAB FAQ, Submit a PAB (don't forget to read the FAQ!), or dig around in the PAB Archives.
Other stuff: Max's Blog (ICE reports, editorials, et al). Feeling generous? ... Max's Wish List at Amazon!
Bookmarks