In his case, the bets he made were higher than 100% of his initial deposit amount and he was recognized as a bonus abuser. Again, I admit that the terms were written too loosely, but we have already made the necessary changes to avoid such cases in the future. This does not change our decisions in the past, though.
Regarding the replies about the "high" wagering. Our casino is a casino that gives away a lot of free money. Every single user gets a no-deposit bonus at signup and I think you know this is not the case in other casinos, especially Playtech's. The same goes for deposit bonuses and free bonuses after deposit. If a player deposits as low as 20$, he will get 300% first deposit bonus and after that he is sure to get more than 50$ in future no-deposit bonuses.
By giving the players more chances to win without depositing, we need to raise the wagering requirements. What good is a 10x wagering in a casino that will give you a 20% deposit bonus and one no-deposit bonus in your whole casino lifetime?
I agree, if you are searching for a casino that gives you a mathematical edge, we are probably not the ones for you. But if you are searching for a casino where you can play the longest with the minimum possible money spent, we should be one of the first choices...
Since a lot of you are surely poker players, it's the same with FullTilt vs PokerStars. One is giving rakeback but has a tougher field, other has awful bonuses, but has larger and weaker field. It's a whole different orientation and it's up to a player to decide...
Bookmarks