
Originally Posted by
topoor
I seem to be fighting a losing battle with Alderney over the moneybookers link. The first reply from them advised me that they would investigate Gamebookers although they thought it unikely that two seperate issues were related!
Once I pointed out that I was referring to MONEYBOOKERS I got a response containing contact details for the FSA!
I have now written back and expressed my disappointment at having to reiterate that this is not an FSA issue but is a complaint about the lies told to Moneybookers from PKR.
Whilst on the phone to moneybookers a customer service rep let it slip that PKR were the complainant but of course Moneybookers will not officially confirm this.
In fact, Moneybookers will now not respond to my requests for information on how to proceed with a subject access request or even how to receive information held about me under the data protection act.
It is shocking that multi million pound, government regulated companies behave in this manner. If it wasnt happening to me I dont think I would believe it!
Alderney is correct, they do NOT regulate Moneybookers, this is indeed an FSA matter, and if Moneybookers do not allow you access to your data under the data protection act (or obstruct your ability to request it), then this is a matter for the Information Commissioner's office.
Since Moneybookers let slip it was PKR that caused your account to be closed, you could now make a Libel claim through the courts for damages (loss of reputation and character with Moneybookers). PKR clearly have something other than mere "bonus abuse" on you, and might explain their evasive responses. I believe that it is 99% the case they have identified you as a fraudster (false ID, moneylaundering etc) and have convinced Moneybookers of this, hence they have closed your account. They have done this BEFORE Alderney have completed their investigation, and you need the results of this before you can be certain of what to do next.
If Alderney rule in your favour, PKR could be in BIG trouble, as you then have an official ruling that PKR have made a false accusation, and further, have passed this to a third party as fact before the appeals and complaints procedures have run their course.
While this is a matter of a confiscated bonus, it is now clear that your reputation has been defamed, and that you have been lied to as to the proper reasoning behind this action by PKR. Given that you know it was PKR that made the complaint to Moneybookers, you will be able to interpret your personal data from Moneybookers, even if they simply state "complaint of..... from unnamed merchant".
This mess could take some while (and effort) to sort out.
PS.
When you request your data from Moneybookers, don't forget about the possibility that your phonecalls were recorded - this would place on record the fact it was PKR that made the complaint.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks