Let the winner beware

[chuchu59]

I can't understand why some casino's can use a B.S. rule ( only one player to an account ) My wife and I both played on BlackLight casino on an account that I had registered. We both liked the games but only have one computer so sometimes she played and sometimes I would. We both had some luck and at different times won $800. & $900. we were paid in a reasonable time. My wife would live chat with them often, she had a streak & won $1800. but in one chat she said " my husband & I " while the money was still pending, that day I got an email saying that I had violated rules that state only one person may register & play on any acct. They voided the winnings completely! The fianance div. stated that it had been brought to there attention that my wife was playing on my acct. I sent them an email stating that was really Nonsence & just an excuse for them not to pay off on a legitimate win, anyone on a computer could have everyone in the town over and play on their Acct. there isn't any way for them to know! Take that to the bank!

i would argue that 'my husband and i' simply means i have a dual personality nd actually its the same person performing dual roles.

[KasinoKing]

i would argue that 'my husband and i' simply means i have a dual personality nd actually its the same person performing dual roles.

Someone round here is obviously very experienced at making up excuses...

Back to the OP; It is very unfortunate, and I do feel for them, but at the end of the day it is VERY clearly spelled out in the terms.
I pretty sure that if anyone had the time & inclination to check, that this, or a very similar term, will be found in the vast majority of online casinos - even the accredited ones.
Whether they would actually enforce it or not is a different story...

KK

[vinylweatherman]

Someone round here is obviously good at making up excuses...

Back to the OP; It is very unfortunate, and I do feel for them, but at the end of the day it is VERY clearly spelled out in the terms.
I pretty sure that if anyone had the time & inclination to check, that this, or a very similar term, will be found in the vast majority of online casinos - even the accredited ones.
Whether they would actually enforce it or not is a different story...

KK

It's a common term, but REPUTABLE casinos do NOT use it in the case of SPOUSES sharing a session at home. Any argument about who owns the money is not relevant as far as the casino is concerned - it belongs to the player registered, and who owns the funds in the deposit method.

Think of it another way, what if the wife just LOST nearly $2000, and then let "my husband and I" slip out in chat whilst negotiating an offer for the next deposit. I bet there would be NO voiding of play and locking the account. This would be SELECTIVE application of the rules only when they work in favour of the casino.


TopGame bitch & moan about the "rough ride" they get from Casinomeister, yet continue to demonstrate WHY they are having such problems. If they BEHAVE in a rogue manner, they shouldn't be surprised when they are CALLED rogues.

This is only going to make matters WORSE for TopGame.