This is an extremely odd rule, and should be considered rogue. There can be no valid reason for having a max cashout on a deposit WITHOUT a bonus, and it seems directed at the very recreational players that casino's claim to want, and let through the "pro's" they DON'T want who will deposit what it takes to get the maximum bonus.
It also seems designed with the current US situation in mind, since it is small deposits that tend to slip past the gaze of UIGEA, with larger ones often getting blocked. Most US players tend to deposit small and often, rather than large and infrequently, knowing this gives them the best chance of avoiding getting tangled up in UIGEA. US players also do this because of the problems with "double charging" and failed transactions placing long term "holds" on their funds.
Since this is unique to the Top Game stable, considered rogue for other reasons by many, it suggests some kind of connection, even if only one of thief and victim. Maybe this lot thought the risk of stealing content from Top Game operators was less than that of stealing content from the majors, yet they stole games from even BIGGER industry players than mere operators, so this still doesn't make much sense.
The only certainty is that following the trail back from Grand Jackpots will lead to a rogue company, individual, software supplier, etc.
The error that caused another player's details to be shown proves how BAD the software is in terms of security. What's to say it won't share card details, or take deposits from the wrong account in banking.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks