vegas2web - Okay just won $14000

**melnrs** · 17th August 2011, 06:04 AM

Okay just won $14000 on a $25 deposit now to see if I actually get the money. Only allowed ACH withdrawal and said it takes 5-10 business days but was recc by Redflush so we shall see. I certainly hope so as this was my biggest win ever.

**maxd** · 17th August 2011, 08:39 AM

Congratulations on your win!

That said, please re-read the Forum Rules Forum Rules regarding hijaking and cross-posting:

1.2 - No "cross posting". In other words, do not post the same message to more than one thread or topic section. Cross postings will be deleted and posting privileges may be suspended for doing so.
...
1.15 - Do not hijack threads. If you have something to say - say it, but please respect the other members by keeping threads "on track". If you have an issue that needs addressing, then please start another thread. Hijacking threads for your own agenda is not only rude, it is troll-like and can lead to a suspension.

You posted this same thing -- that's cross-posting -- in two (fairly) unrelated threads -- that's "hijaking" -- within minutes of each other. Please don't. Thank you for your cooperation.

**SlotMonster** · 17th August 2011, 10:23 AM

14k is pretty big win, congrats! Would love to see ya been paid

**samoas** · 17th August 2011, 04:24 PM

Congrats melnrs and please keep us posted on the outcome.

**chayton** · 17th August 2011, 09:58 PM

Congrats on the win, but I'm confused about the relationship of vegas2web to Red Flush?

**vinylweatherman** · 17th August 2011, 10:22 PM

Originally Posted by chayton

Congrats on the win, but I'm confused about the relationship of vegas2web to Red Flush?

When Red Flush pulled out of the US completely, and the "level 11" variant was scrapped, they directed their players to vegas2web instead. This means that as far as players are concerned, Red Flush "staked their reputation" on vegas2web being a suitable venue for their players. This case will test this, and what SHOULD happen is that if the player broke no terms, they get paid just as they would have done had they made this win from Red Flush.

If the OP is "up to something", vegas2web should make sure Max is cooperated with and able to make a fair determination either way. They should NOT ignore Max should this go to a PAB situation, as this would create a negative image for what for many is an "unheard of" brand designed to allow casinos to retain some kind of "interest" in the future performance of the players they were forced to shed when Level 11 shut down it's software.

Many Microgaming casinos "partnered" with seemingly unrelated operators in order to have somewhere to redirect their players. Many reported being directed to Jackpot Capital, and questions were also asked about what the relationship between the casinos was. These were never really answered by the operators other than by some vague PR "gloss". The speculation was that they sold their US databases to these operators for a fixed sum, allowing these operators rapid access to a ready made player base that was likely to respond to the right kind of marketing.

**4 of a kind** · 18th August 2011, 02:47 AM

Originally Posted by vinylweatherman

When Red Flush pulled out of the US completely, and the "level 11" variant was scrapped, they directed their players to vegas2web instead.

Many Microgaming casinos "partnered" with seemingly unrelated operators in order to have somewhere to redirect their players. Many reported being directed to Jackpot Capital, and questions were also asked about what the relationship between the casinos was. These were never really answered by the operators other than by some vague PR "gloss". The speculation was that they sold their US databases to these operators for a fixed sum, allowing these operators rapid access to a ready made player base that was likely to respond to the right kind of marketing.

We will never know exactly what actually took place. Presently, online gaming and the USA has really gone underground. Many casinos already closed or refuse to take bets from the USA, and many just sold their USA market off like Bodog and Red Flush. Of course these casinos that sold off have to promote the new buyers, after all they got paid for projected customers.

I think the casinos that decide to stay with the USA market have no option other then to close their doors. In addition I’m convinced that the present conditions for USA players has taken several steps backwards (to the stone age for online gaming) and no longer justifies any risk. The fun of gambling is knowing you’re going to get paid when you win. Today in the USA, no one knows where their money is, when their going to get it, or if they’ll even get it at all.

Even if the OP eventually gets his money this time, will he the next time?

**bonustreak** · 18th August 2011, 05:03 AM

WOW that is a great win!! Please let us know on the payout

**samoas** · 18th August 2011, 05:25 AM

Originally Posted by vinylweatherman

The speculation was that they sold their US databases to these operators for a fixed sum, allowing these operators rapid access to a ready made player base that was likely to respond to the right kind of marketing.

Layman's terms: We are a bunch of degenerates and need our fix so we will come running.

I love your posts vinyl, they are spot on!

**mattsgame** · 18th August 2011, 06:11 AM

To be honest I am a bit concerned for the OP here.

They posted HERE that they where playing with a free chip, and then asked to make a $25 deposit which is usually used as a verification deposit to withdraw. So if the op has made the $25 deposit and played on with they $250 + $25 then the casino will pull the max cash out rule

I hope I am wrong but this is how most Rivals work with free chips. As the OP never reversed the original win on the free chip it was not a fresh deposit.