How to know which casinos are part of a group?

[KasinoKing]

Originally Posted by Simmo!

FYI Golden Star Network and Vegas Partner Lounge have joined forces to form "Star Lounge" I believe as of this month, so that list should probably also include the VPL casinos like Crazy Vegas etc.

Oooops, silly me - it was late & I was tired!

All closing down as a result of the merger:-
Arthurian Casino
777 Dragon Casino
Casino US/UK
Slots Royale Casino
Miami Paradise Casino
Poker Room LA

This will leave just the following Vegas Partner Lounge & Golden Riviera Group casinos in place:-
Aspinals (VPL)
Cinema (VPL)
Crazy Vegas (VPL)
Maple (VPL)
Sun Vegas (VPL)
Golden Riviera (G.Star)
River Nile (G.Star)

Cheers Simmo!

[jetset]

This move was reported in Casinomeister's News Section

[jetset]

Originally Posted by bigbonytony

Hello all. Love the forum!

My question is this:

How do I know which casinos are grouped together? For instance, the terms and conditions for Golden Riviera Casino state that you can not play at any other casinos in the Golden Riviera group. I tried to google "Golden Riviera Group" but could not find a listing of their casinos. Is there a master list somewhere? Lots of casinos state that you are allowed one account/per person/per household and do not care if you play at their "sister" companies. But some do care (I don't know why) and I find it hard (as a novice) to figure out who is with who.

Thanks for the help.

Good post.

The online gambling industry is dynamic to say the least, and to keep an accurate list of which casinos are in which ownership groups is both time and labour-consuming....and it requires constant updating as developments occur.

One of the most diligent (and even they slip up occasionally) at doing this is Casino City in my opinion.

[KasinoKing]

Originally Posted by jetset

One of the most diligent (and even they slip up occasionally) at doing this is Casino City in my opinion.

I am a little... disappointed to see both you & Simmo (both very respected members of this forum) 'sort of suggesting' that people should go to that site.
(Just by mentioning it's name people may be curious & pay a visit)
Although they do have comprehensive lists, including most of the best casinos on the net, they are mixed in with promotions for out-and-out rogues whom Bryan is continually telling people to avoid.
A site of that stature should be leading the fight against rogues, not encouraging them.

Just my personal opinion.
KK.

[jetset]

Whilst I agree with you that major information sites should ideally carry that sort of warning, KK it is not (afaik) Casino City's core purpose, whereas information is, and I know that they have staff that are kept on the hop updating as much as they can, whenever they can on the site.

I therefore am of the personal view that it is a valuable source of information, notwithstanding the fact that it does not seem to get involved in mediating player disputes or flagging rogues.

[winbig]

Originally Posted by jetset

Whilst I agree with you that major information sites should ideally carry that sort of warning, KK it is not (afaik) Casino City's core purpose, whereas information is, and I know that they have staff that are kept on the hop updating as much as they can, whenever they can on the site.

I therefore am of the personal view that it is a valuable source of information, notwithstanding the fact that it does not seem to get involved in mediating player disputes or flagging rogues.

If it was solely a valuable source of information, then why are there affiliate tags associated with these Rogue casinos? Take Golden Casino for instance....not paying USA players....but yet there's no mention of payment problems on that site even though they have a new writeup about the new Evil Knievel slot at the casino posted just a couple of weeks ago.

If what you say is true about their core purpose being to provide information, I think any casino's difficulties/unwillingness to pay American players should be on the top of their list, not the other way around with encouraging players to deposit.

[Simmo!]

Originally Posted by KasinoKing

I am a little... disappointed to see both you & Simmo (both very respected members of this forum) 'sort of suggesting' that people should go to that site.

I think you missed the point of my post. I was asked where the information of which casinos were part of which groups. Casino City is by far the best database for this as it includes the rogue casinos - the ones who are likely to use that as an excuse for voiding bonuses. Without the rogues, the list would be of much lesser value. That was the reason I also put the accredited list in the same post, so the poster could compare.

[lojo]

Casino city editorial staff produces good articles, good newsletters. There web content sucks for accuracy. They definitely do not have enough staff working on it. And yes, they promote rogues for profit and they just keep growing off their ill-gotten gains.

Do they still own the GPWA?

[aka23]

Casino France Net does not appear in the list a few posts up, which is in the Golden Star group.

Note that the casino lists on my site are sortable by group (click on "Group" header"), and include nearly all casinos I have seen mentioned on these forums. Rogues and other high-risk casinos have warnings.

[winbig]

Originally Posted by aka23

Casino France Net does not appear in the list a few posts up, which is in the Golden Star group.

Note that the casino lists on my site are sortable by group (click on "Group" header"), and include nearly all casinos I have seen mentioned on these forums. Rogues and other high-risk casinos have warnings.

You don't have affiliate tags associated with the links to rogue/high risk casinos, do you?