Dear Babyboomer,
Quote:
Originally Posted by babyboomer
Thanks for your reply. Just have to ask you why would you contact me through Casinomeister? First off if you would address my e-mails separately from this forum I would appreciate it ....... I would rather you e-mail me directly just add the number 55 (after babyboomer) to the address on file.
|
I contacted you through a pm on this forum as it was the only means I had .. the emails to your address bounced and I remembered seeing the 'babyboomer' alias here, simply putting 1 and 1 together. Now that your email address is corrected, all 3Dice communication will go via the regular email path.
Quote:
Originally Posted by babyboomer
if I take the bonus wuill I be subject to a"30X" wagering requirement?
|
Apologies, I must've been unclear in my original pm to you, our loyalty bonus is not subject to any wagering requirement. Since a player needs loyalty points (comp points) to be eligible for this bonus, this in effect means that the required wagering is already performed in the past. So, the short answer to your question is no, there are no wagering requirements for loyalty bonuses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by babyboomer
Just don't judge me because I am against casinos that do NOT PAY or CHEAT.
|
I'm not here to deliver judgment, I'm here to deliver service ! I myself am all for an open forum where all opinions can be shared, and as long as things happen in a respectful and mature manner, I think it can only benefit both the players and the industry.
I can see that you are passionate in your opinion, and I think that is a good thing. Combined with the experience in dealing with casino-issues that you find at CM it could be the perfect mix to maximize your chances of getting your issues resolved. I can only imagine the emotions involved when confronted with a non-payment scenario, and I can appreciate what adrenaline can do to a man .. it is crucial however to keep ones eye on the real target, and no-one here at CM will get anything out of helping a casino with questionable business ethics. I am not in the position to judge anyone - not you - and not the casinomeister members, and I will be assuming good intentions from all parties until proven otherwise !
Respectfully,
Enzo
----------------------------------------------------------
Addendum
----------------------------------------------------------
Babyboomer,
I've decided not to hold your history on this forum against you. This is a personal decision, which I hope I wont regret as usually we tend to follow the advice we get from casinomeister. On a personal note, and I have not yet read into any of it - but the emotions involved can make a well-meant 'chill out' look like 'shut up' whereas it should look like 'a calm and friendly email describing your situation to the casino is most likely to be more effective in resolving your issue'. Re-reading your previous threads with a different mindset, one that assumes people want to help, can make things look entirely differently. And if it does, all it would take from you is a short message explaining why things got out of hand - we all understand what stress some casino practices these days can cause ..
All the best,
Enzo