Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Gunslinger
I understand what you're getting at, but I respectfully disagree. I don't really think that a casino's likelyhood not to pay should lend to it's consideration when defending the non-payment of players.
|
I think your disagreement comes from misinterpretation of my post as defense of non-payment, which it absolutely wasn't; my point was simply that this was an extremely risky situation to attempt to exploit - it had nightmares written all over it, for the reasons I suggested above.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Freakin
Joyland's webpage during the time period in question said that comp points were paid out one for every .25 wagered (just like the rest of the Crown Solutions casinos) and it said that the rate at which you can cash in comp points depends on your VIP status. Is it unreasonable to assume a player depositing for a VIP High Roller bonus would not be made a VIP with a higher than average comp point cashin rate?
|
The key being "assume". However VIP anyone is, a 4% comp rate is extraordinary. To achieve such a level, if such exists, a player would have to be a seriously known quantity as a provenly serious sucker, with a lot of sucker-play history in the bag at the casino in question. To achieve that 4% level on signup is, I'm sure, unheard of. On that basis, yes, this was an unreasonable assumption. And again, the key is "assumption": there was no written backup to any of this. It was always going to be far too easy for the casino to fudge its way out of.
At the risk of chasing my own tail here, again I say: kudos to you folks for a good spot and a ballsy shot, but the potential payment issues in my opinion far and away outweighed the potential winnings. Ten bucks or a million, if they ain't going to pay, don't touch it.