@Dom: I'm not at all surprised that GP rejected the opportunity to interact with any team that included
CAP, and we all know why.
The rest of your opening sentence is, again, not based on known fact but your personal suspicions that eCOGRA was engaged as the most malleable option - offensive to professionals to say the least.
@ Triple7: I might as well join the speculation game as well, and comment that I have to disagree with your theory that most webmasters would have been unaware of the invitation to submit claims.
I believe that given the nature of the business, the need to keep abreast of developments impacting affiliate business and the prevalence of message board usage, the balance of probabilities is that most affiliates earning a living from promoting online casino sites to players would be members of at least one and possibly more of the major online gambling and webmaster information sites.
But then neither of us can prove the point, can we?
Quick question for you Triple7, so that I can better understand your situation.
1) Were you receiving payments derived from your 'legacy' Referspot players as well as current GP program players right up to the end of December 2008 when GP pulled the plug?
Can you say what percentage of your income was coming from your Referspot legacy players when the program closed?
2) At that point (end December 2008) were you owed any money by GP, and if so were you one of the perhaps more fortunate but mysteriously quiet webmasters who GP claims received a compensation offer?
3) Can you estimate what you think you were owed by end December 2009 when you submitted a claim to the eCOGRA investigation?
4) Can you recall what date the Referspot program was switched to a GP program? How long were you a member of the Referspot program?
Bookmarks